KANKAM v. BUACHI III [1964] GLR 138-162

Estoppel—By conduct—Executive decision delimiting a boundary—Presumption of regularity—Whether a party who has consented to an executive decision delimiting a boundary is estopped from re-opening boundary dispute after a lapse of twenty years.

Courts—Jurisdiction—Supreme Court—Decision of High Court fixing a boundary by interpreting an executive decision—Circumstances in which appeal may lie to the Supreme Court—Boundary, Land, Tribute and Fishery Disputes (Executive Decisions Validation) Ashanti, Ordinance, Cap. 144 (1951 Rev.), s. 3 (3).

