Way v Latilla The appellant alleged that he had made an agreement with the respondent that the appellant should obtain and send to the respondent information relating to gold mines and concessions in West Africa, and that the appellant should introduce concessions for acquisition by the respondent, and that the respondent would protect the appellant’s interests in respect of concessions acquired, and give to the appellant the customary, or a reasonable, share in the same, and should pay to the appellant a reasonable sum in respect of information and reports.