INSERT INTO `courtrulings` (`id`, `title`, `content`, `link`, `isshow`, `author`, `date`, `courttype`, `summary`, `presiding`, `casetype`, `subjectmatter`, `caseno`, `counsel1`, `counsel2`, `courtname`, `caseDate`, `subjectmattertitle`) VALUES
(5649, 'THE REPUBLIC VRS GA SOUTH MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY', '', '../links/cases/THE REPUBLIC VRS GA SOUTH MUNICIPAL.pdf', 'Yes', 'JOE ATTIPOE ESQ., JOE ATTIPOE ESQ', '2012', 'High Court', 'THE REPUBLIC VRS GA SOUTH MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY   Mandamus, is an order of most extensive remedial nature, and is in form, a command issuing from the High Court of Justice directed to any person, corporation or inferior tribunal, requiring him or them to do some particular thing therein specified which appertains to his or their office and is in the nature of a public duty, this is how, Halsbury’s law of England, defined mandamus.', 'N. M. C. ABODAKPI', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '2012-05-17', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE'),
(5650, 'THE REPUBLIC VRS HON. P.C. APPIAH-OFORI', '', '../links/cases/THE REPUBLIC   VRS  HON. P.C. APPIAH-OFORI.pdf', 'Yes', 'JOE ATTIPOE ESQ., JOE ATTIPOE ESQ', '2012', 'High Court', 'THE REPUBLIC VRS HON. P.C. APPIAH-This ruling is in respect of an application by Hotel Shangri La Limited for an order of this court to commit the Respondents namely, Honourable P.C. Appiah-Ofori, Mr. Michael Adjetey Sowah and Freeman George Tetteh for contempt of court.', 'UUTER PAUL DERY', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '2012-03-09', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE'),
(5651, 'THE REPUBLIC VRS HON. P.C. APPIAH-OFORI', '', '../links/cases/THE REPUBLIC   VRS  HON. P.C. APPIAH-OFORI.pdf', 'Yes', 'JOE ATTIPOE ESQ., JOE ATTIPOE ESQ', '2012', 'High Court', 'THE REPUBLIC VRS HON. P.C. APPIAH-This ruling is in respect of an application by Hotel Shangri La Limited for an order of this court to commit the Respondents namely, Honourable P.C. Appiah-Ofori, Mr. Michael Adjetey Sowah and Freeman George Tetteh for contempt of court.', 'UUTER PAUL DERY', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '2012-03-09', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE'),
(5652, 'THE REPUBLIC VRS LANDS COMMISSION', '', '', 'Yes', 'MR. YAW OPPONG., MRS. SYLVIA ADUSU., SOPHIA AMISSAH-LARYEA', '2012', 'High Court', 'THE REPUBLIC VRS LANDS COMMISSION  According to the Applicant he owns the piece of land referred to above.  On or about 25-11-2005, he sold this land to one Mr. Osei Akoto Kessie and executed an assignment in his favour.', 'UUTER PAUL DERY', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '2012-03-27', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE'),
(5653, 'THE REPUBLIC VRS LANDS COMMISSION', '', '', 'Yes', 'MR. YAW OPPONG., MRS. SYLVIA ADUSU., SOPHIA AMISSAH-LARYEA', '2012', 'High Court', 'THE REPUBLIC VRS LANDS COMMISSION  According to the Applicant he owns the piece of land referred to above.  On or about 25-11-2005, he sold this land to one Mr. Osei Akoto Kessie and executed an assignment in his favour.', 'UUTER PAUL DERY', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '2012-03-27', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE'),
(5654, 'THOMAS OSEI    VRS   E.P. GHANA', '', '../links/cases/THOMAS OSEI  VRS E.P. GHANA.pdf', 'Yes', 'JOE ATTIPOE ESQ., JOE ATTIPOE ESQ', '2012', 'High Court', 'THOMAS OSEI    VRS   E.P. GHANA This ruling is in respect of an application by the plaintiff for extension of time to cross-appeal pursuant to rule 9 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1997 (C.I. 19) as amended.', 'UUTER PAUL DERY', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '2012-07-11', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE'),
(5655, 'UT FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD VRS   FRANK KOFI AGYEMAN PREMPEH', '', '../links/cases/UT FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD  VRS.pdf', 'Yes', 'JOE ATFTIPOE ESQ., JOE ATTIPOE ESQ', '2012', 'High Court', 'UT FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD VRS   FRANK KOFI AGYEMAN PREMPEH    A further recovery of an amount of GH¢10,059.00 which became due and owing as at 21-10-2009 arising out of an auto loan facility granted the Defendant.', 'JUSTICE S.H. OCRAN', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '2012-06-26', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE'),
(5656, 'AFTECH CONSULTANCY LTD VRS', '', '../links/cases/ALFRED TABIRU ALOA.pdf', 'Yes', 'JOE ATTIPOE ESQ., JOE ATTIPOE ESQ', '2012', 'High Court', 'LAND MILL TD On 30th November, 2011 this court gave judgment in default of defence for the Plaintiffs for the recovery of the sum of US$104,463 or its cedis equivalent  and interest thereon as well as cost of GH¢5,000.00.', 'UUTER PAUL DERY', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '2012-03-09', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE'),
(5657, 'WILLIAM FUGAR VRS SOFT SHEEN CARSON', '', '../links/cases/WILLIAM FUGAR.pdf', 'Yes', 'JOE ATTIPOE ESQ., JOE ATTIPOE ESQ', '2012', 'High Court', 'WILLIAM FUGAR VRS SOFT SHEEN CARSON    Further to the lease agreement which was tendered in these proceedings by the Plaintiff as Exhibit A, the Defendant went into occupation of the premises.  On 12th February 2010, the tenant wrote terminating the lease.  To better appreciate the issues in this case the letter is reproduced:', 'K. A. OFORI ATTA', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '2012-05-31', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE '),
(5658, 'A L Sturge & Co v Excess Insurance Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/A L Sturge.pdf', 'Yes', 'William Charles Crocker., Linklaters & Paines', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Insurance – Guarantee policy – Guarantee of payment of bonds – Bonds containing gold clause – Guarantee of redemption at par – Whether insurance of payment on a gold basis', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-01-04', 'PRACTICE PROCEDURE'),
(5659, 'A/S Rendal v Arcos Ltd', '', '../links/cases/A.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sinclair Roche & Temperley., Middleton Lewis & Clarke', '1937', 'Supreme', 'A steamship was chartered by Arcos Ltd of London, “for Exportles, Moscow,â€ in terms of a Chamber of Shipping “Baltwoodâ€ charterparty, which contained a clause binding the charterers to supply the steamer with continuous ice-breaker assistance, and a provision that notice of claims must be given within twelve months of the date of the vessel’s arrival at final port of discharge.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-09-10', 'SHIPPING'),
(5660, 'A/S Rendal v Arcos Ltd', '', '../links/cases/A.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sinclair Roche & Temperley., Middleton Lewis & Clarke', '1937', 'Supreme', 'A steamship was chartered by Arcos Ltd of London, “for Exportles, Moscow,â€ in terms of a Chamber of Shipping “Baltwoodâ€ charterparty, which contained a clause binding the charterers to supply the steamer with continuous ice-breaker assistance, and a provision that notice of claims must be given within twelve months of the date of the vessel’s arrival at final port of discharge.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-09-10', 'SHIPPING'),
(5661, 'Adamson v Birkenhead Corporation', '', '../links/cases/Adamson v Birkenhead Corporation.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hamlins Grammer., Thompson Rigby', '1937', 'High Court', 'The plaintiff sought to restrain the defendant corporation from causing a nuisance to certain lands of which he was the owner. The nuisance was alleged to have been caused by the negligent construction by the corporation of a street and the drains and sewers lying thereunder, whereby certain field drains had been damaged.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-12', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5662, 'Adamson v Birkenhead Corporation', '', '../links/cases/Adamson v Birkenhead Corporation.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hamlins Grammer., Thompson Rigby', '1937', 'High Court', 'The plaintiff sought to restrain the defendant corporation from causing a nuisance to certain lands of which he was the owner. The nuisance was alleged to have been caused by the negligent construction by the corporation of a street and the drains and sewers lying thereunder, whereby certain field drains had been damaged.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-12', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5663, 'Alderman v Great Western Railway Company', '', '../links/cases/Alderman v Great Western Railway Company.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pattinson & Brewer., A G Hubbard', '1938', 'High Court', 'Alderman v Great Western Railway Company  A railway ticket-collector lived at Oxford, his home station. His duty consisted of travelling from Oxford to Swansea, via London, on one day, and returning from Swansea to Oxford, via London, on the following day.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-01-04', 'HEALTH'),
(5664, 'Alderman v Great Western Railway Company', '', '../links/cases/Alderman v Great Western Railway Company.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pattinson & Brewer., A G Hubbard', '1938', 'High Court', 'Alderman v Great Western Railway Company  A railway ticket-collector lived at Oxford, his home station. His duty consisted of travelling from Oxford to Swansea, via London, on one day, and returning from Swansea to Oxford, via London, on the following day.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-01-04', 'HEALTH'),
(5665, 'Alderton v Essex County Council', '', '../links/cases/Alderton v Essex County Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard., Hugh-Jones., L G Lewis., Chelmsford.,E S Holcroft', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Alderton v Essex County Council  A county councillor representing part of a borough, whose council was a local education authority for the purposes of elementary education within the Education Act 1921, and was a separate district for the purposes of the Maternity and Child Welfare Act 1918, was also a member of the education committee of the county council and of the education finance sub-committee.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-03-07', 'EDUCATION'),
(5666, 'Allen and Another v Trehearne', '', '../links/cases/Allen and Another v Trehearne.pdf', 'Yes', 'Windybank Samuell., Lawrence.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Allen and Another v Trehearne  The managing director of a company was entitled, under an agreement with the company, by way of remuneration for his services, inter alia, to a terminal sum of £10,000 to be payable by the company to the managing director or his personal representatives upon the final termination from any cause whatsoever (other than the wilful default of the managing director in the performance of his duties) of his service with the company', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-11', 'TAXATION'),
(5667, 'Allen and Another v Trehearne', '', '../links/cases/Allen and Another v Trehearne.pdf', 'Yes', 'Windybank Samuell., Lawrence.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Allen and Another v Trehearne  The managing director of a company was entitled, under an agreement with the company, by way of remuneration for his services, inter alia, to a terminal sum of £10,000 to be payable by the company to the managing director or his personal representatives upon the final termination from any cause whatsoever (other than the wilful default of the managing director in the performance of his duties) of his service with the company', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-11', 'TAXATION'),
(5668, 'Allied Newspapers Ltd v Hindsley', '', '../links/cases/Allied Newspapers Ltd v Hindsley.pdf', 'Yes', 'S H White.', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Allied Newspapers Ltd v Hindsley  An appeal from the judgment of Lawrence J, reported [1937] 2 All ER 663, was dismissed, without the respondents being called upon.', 'Jocelyn Bodilly Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-10', 'TAXATION'),
(5669, 'Anderson', '', '../links/cases/Anderson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Parker Garrett', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Anderson  A voluntary transfer of a mortgage upon which the sum of £4,937 17s was outstanding, together with current interest amounting to £95 9s 1d, making a total sum secured of £5,033 6s 1d, was assessed to stamp duty at ad valorem conveyance duty upon the sum of £5,033 6s 1d, the value of the property transferred', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-04-07', 'TAXATION'),
(5670, 'Andreae v Selfridge', '', '../links/cases/Andreae v Selfridge.pdf', 'Yes', 'Jaques., Boyce Evans., Sheppard', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Andreae v Selfridge The plaintiff was the occupier of a hotel upon the northern side of an island site. The defendant company acquired the leasehold interests upon the site and, in the course of doing so, bought the residue of the plaintiff’s term and proceeded to demolish first the building on the south-east corner of the island site, and later those in the south-west corner of that site and to build new buildings upon that site.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-06', 'TORTS'),
(5671, 'Andreae v Selfridge', '', '../links/cases/Andreae v Selfridge.pdf', 'Yes', 'Jaques., Boyce Evans., Sheppard', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Andreae v Selfridge The plaintiff was the occupier of a hotel upon the northern side of an island site. The defendant company acquired the leasehold interests upon the site and, in the course of doing so, bought the residue of the plaintiff’s term and proceeded to demolish first the building on the south-east corner of the island site, and later those in the south-west corner of that site and to build new buildings upon that site.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-06', 'TORTS'),
(5672, 'Appeal of Gardner, Re Maschek, Re Tyrrell', '', '../links/cases/Appeal of Gardner.pdf', 'Yes', 'Shaen Roscoe Massey.,', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Appeal of Gardner, Re Maschek, Re Tyrrell The work of the employees, who were modellers, was to mould clay into ornaments and other things, according to the employer’s instructions, and for this purpose they were supplied with photographs and detailed working drawings, so that the finished model was a reproduction of something conveyed to them by the drawings and photographs, and not an artistic creation of their own.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-01-20', 'INSURANCE'),
(5673, 'Appendrodt v Central Middlesex Assessment Committee', '', '../links/cases/Appendrodt v Central Middlesex Assessment Committee.pdf', 'Yes', 'Rye & Rye., Blundell Baker', '1937', 'High Court', 'Appendrodt v Central Middlesex Assessment Committee In April 1932, a new justices’ on-licence was granted for 5¼ years upon condition that the licensee should pay a monopoly value of £3,000 by instalments of £600.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-06', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(5674, 'Armstrong v Estate Duty Commissioner', '', '../links/cases/Armstrong v Estate Duty Commissioner.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Burchells', '1937', 'High Court', 'Armstrong v Estate Duty Commissioner A testator by his will bequeathed an annuity of £10,000 to his wife, clear of all death duties and income tax, and directed that his trustees should be at liberty, if they thought fit, to set apart out of the residuary estate investments representing such a capital fund as should, at the time of appropriation, be sufficient to produce annual sums to pay the annuity.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-11', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5675, 'Ashby v Tolhurst', '', '../links/cases/Ashby v Tolhurst.pdf', 'Yes', 'Clyde & Co., Middleton Lewis & Clarke., Middleton & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Ashby v Tolhurst The plaintiff drove his motor car on to a piece of ground belonging to the defendants, paid 1s to an attendant, who was in the defendants’ employment, received a ticket and left the car with its doors locked.', 'Malcolm Logan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-12', 'TORTS'),
(5676, 'Attorney-General (at the relation of Ormerod Taylor & Son Ltd) and Ormerod Taylor & Son Ltd v Todmorden', '', '../links/cases/Attorney vrs  Todmodern.pdf', 'Yes', 'Torr & Co., Sager & Gledhill., Kenneth., Brown Baker Baker.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Attorney-General (at the relation of Ormerod Taylor & Son Ltd) and Ormerod Taylor & Son Ltd v Todmorden  A highway, vested in the defendant corporation and situated on an incline, was supported by a retaining-wall, which was extended upwards above the road to the height of about 2 ft 6 ins as a fence-wall.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-08', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5677, 'Attorney-General (at the relation of Ormerod Taylor & Son Ltd) and Ormerod Taylor & Son Ltd v Todmorden', '', '../links/cases/Attorney vrs  Todmodern.pdf', 'Yes', 'Torr & Co., Sager & Gledhill., Kenneth., Brown Baker Baker.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Attorney-General (at the relation of Ormerod Taylor & Son Ltd) and Ormerod Taylor & Son Ltd v Todmorden  A highway, vested in the defendant corporation and situated on an incline, was supported by a retaining-wall, which was extended upwards above the road to the height of about 2 ft 6 ins as a fence-wall.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-08', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5678, 'Attorney-General v Liverpool Corporation and London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co', '', '../links/cases/Attorney vrs liverpool cooperation.pdf', 'Yes', 'Robins Hay., Alexander., Eddy., Waters', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Attorney-General v Liverpool Corporation and London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co  The respondent railway company, an amalgamated railway company, was the owner of a railway undertaking situated partly within and partly without the area of supply for electricity purposes of the respondent corporation, which railway undertaking included an undertaking which was, before absorption, the undertaking of the W railway company.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-11', 'INDUSTRY'),
(5679, 'Attorney-General v London Casino Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Attorney vrs london casino ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kenneth Brown Baker Baker', '1937', 'High Court', 'Attorney-General v London Casino Ltd The defendant company was in occupation of premises which had previously been used as a theatre. These premises were adapted for use as a restaurant, but the general aspect of a theatre was retained; the stage was enlarged, the seats in the stalls and dress circle were replaced by tables and chairs, and staircases were built from the dress circle to the stage.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-06', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(5680, 'Attorney-General v London Casino Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Attorney vrs london casino ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kenneth Brown Baker Baker', '1937', 'High Court', 'Attorney-General v London Casino Ltd The defendant company was in occupation of premises which had previously been used as a theatre. These premises were adapted for use as a restaurant, but the general aspect of a theatre was retained; the stage was enlarged, the seats in the stalls and dress circle were replaced by tables and chairs, and staircases were built from the dress circle to the stage.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-06', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(5681, 'Attorney-General v Poole Corporation', '', '../links/cases/Attorney vrs pooley cooperation.pdf', 'Yes', 'Arthur S Joseph & Co., Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Poole', '1937', 'High Court', 'Attorney-General v Poole Corporation A local authority acquired land in fee simple to be used as an open space and covenanted to preserve the land as an open space and take all necessary steps to maintain the land as such.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-12', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5682, 'Attorney-General v Poole Corporation', '', '../links/cases/Attorney vrs pooley cooperation.pdf', 'Yes', 'Arthur S Joseph & Co., Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Poole', '1937', 'High Court', 'Attorney-General v Poole Corporation A local authority acquired land in fee simple to be used as an open space and covenanted to preserve the land as an open space and take all necessary steps to maintain the land as such.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-12', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5683, 'Attorney-General (at the relation of Rochdale Corporation) v Rochdale Canal Co', '', '../links/cases/Attorney vrs Roch Dale canal.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Town Clerk., Winter & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Attorney-General (at the relation of Rochdale Corporation) v Rochdale Canal Co A canal company supplied a railway company at two points with water for the purpose of raising steam in the latter company’s locomotive engines.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-04-06', 'TRANSPORT'),
(5684, 'Attorney-General v Canter', '', '../links/cases/Attorney_General vrs canter.pdf', 'Yes', 'Burr Sugden & Co., W G Burr Sugden & Co., Keighley', '1939', 'High Court', 'Attorney-General v Canter The deceased had incurred liabilities to the Inland Revenue in respect of incorrect statements made in his returns for income tax for the years ending 5 April 1932, and 5 April 1933.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1939-01-16', 'SUCCESSION'),
(5685, 'Attorney-General v Canter', '', '../links/cases/Attorney_General vrs canter.pdf', 'Yes', 'Burr Sugden & Co., W G Burr Sugden & Co., Keighley', '1939', 'High Court', 'Attorney-General v Canter The deceased had incurred liabilities to the Inland Revenue in respect of incorrect statements made in his returns for income tax for the years ending 5 April 1932, and 5 April 1933.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1939-01-16', 'SUCCESSION'),
(5686, 'Austins of East Ham Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Austins of East Ham Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kenneth Brown Baker Baker.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Austins of East Ham Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners The appellant company, the accounts of which had been made up to 31 March 1934, entered into negotiations for the sale of its business.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-22', 'COMPANY'),
(5687, 'Avery v London & North Eastern Railway Co', '', '../links/cases/Avery v London.pdf', 'Yes', 'Buchanan Pritchard., Pattinson & Brewer', '1937', 'High Court', 'Avery v London & North Eastern Railway Co This case was in some measure the subject of decision in Gill’s case, which is also a decision of the Court of Appeal. That case had, however, been adversely criticised by the House of Lords in Kinneil’s case, and the court has therefore felt free to deal with the matter without reference to that decision.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-19', 'TORTS'),
(5688, 'B Davis Ltd v Tooth & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/B Davis Ltd v Tooth.pdf', 'Yes', 'Seaton Taylor & Co., Bell Brodrick & Gray', '1937', 'High Court', 'B Davis Ltd v Tooth & Co Ltd The plaintiff company, who had the sole export agency for a certain brand of whisky in Australasia, made a contract with the defendant company, whereby the latter became the sole agent in New South Wales for the sale of that whisky.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-10', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5689, 'B G Utting & Co Ltd v Hughes', '', '../links/cases/B G Utting.pdf', 'Yes', 'Royds Rawstorne & Co.,', '1938', 'Supreme', 'B G Utting & Co Ltd v Hughes The appellant company carried on the business of speculative builders, building houses upon land owned by them, and, upon the completion of the building, disposing of some of the houses by granting a 99-years’ lease in consideration of a premium paid in cash and the reservation of a ground rent.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-01-18', 'TAXATION'),
(5690, 'B G Utting & Co Ltd v Hughes', '', '../links/cases/B G Utting.pdf', 'Yes', 'Royds Rawstorne & Co.,', '1938', 'Supreme', 'B G Utting & Co Ltd v Hughes The appellant company carried on the business of speculative builders, building houses upon land owned by them, and, upon the completion of the building, disposing of some of the houses by granting a 99-years’ lease in consideration of a premium paid in cash and the reservation of a ground rent.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-01-18', 'TAXATION'),
(5691, 'Bailey v Geddes', '', '../links/cases/Bailey v Geddes.pdf', 'Yes', 'Raymonds., Stanley & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Bailey v Geddes The decision here is that there is an absolute statutory duty upon a motorist approaching a pedestrian crossing not to enter thereon unless he can see that there is no pedestrian upon the crossing.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-17', 'TORTS'),
(5692, 'Bailey v Howard', '', '../links/cases/Bailey v Howard.pdf', 'Yes', 'Clifford-Turner., Rider Heaton Meredith & Mills', '1938', 'High Court', 'Bailey v Howard The Court of Appeal has here rejected the suggestion that the measure of damages for loss of expectation of life is less when the plaintiff is suing on behalf of the estate of a deceased person than it is when a living person is the plaintiff.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-00-08', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5693, 'Baker (Liquidator of First National Pathé Ltd) v Cook (Inspector of Taxes)', '', '../links/cases/Baker vrs cook.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kenneth Brown Baker Baker', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Baker (Liquidator of First National Pathé Ltd) v Cook (Inspector of Taxes)  Under an agreement, whereby a company sold all its assets to the appellant company, it was agreed that, in the event of the liquidation of the appellant company, the appellant company would sell and the vendor company would purchase, inter alia, the appellant company’s goodwill, copyright in films, and the benefit of all booking agreements for certain films entered into by the appellant company.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-15', 'TAXATION'),
(5694, 'Balchin v Balchin', '', '../links/cases/Balchin v Balchin.pdf', 'Yes', 'Jackson & Jackson., Edridge Son & Marten., Winter-Taylor & Woodward.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Balchin v Balchin In May 1936, a wife, who at the time was living separate from her husband, applied to a certain bench of justices for maintenance on the ground of desertion and wilful neglect to maintain.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-14', 'FAMILY'),
(5695, 'Bank of Ethiopia v National Bank of Egypt and Liguori', '', '../links/cases/Bank of Ethiopia v National Bank of Egypt and Liguori.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wordsworth Marr Johnson.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Bank of Ethiopia v National Bank of Egypt and Liguori The Bank of Ethiopia was formed under the law of Ethiopia in 1931. It was a bank of issue and was the only bank in the Ethiopian Empire.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-09', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5696, 'Barnes v Irwell Valley Water Board', '', '../links/cases/Barnes v Irwell Valley Water Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barlow Rowland & Co., Richard Moore', '1937', 'High Court', 'Barnes v Irwell Valley Water Board The plaintiffs were supplied with water for domestic purposes by the defendant water board. It was proved that the water was pure so long as it was in iron pipes, but in its passage through lead pipes it dissolved lead and became poisonous.', 'M D Chorlton Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-10', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5697, 'Barnes (Inspector of Taxes) v Hely Hutchinson', '', '../links/cases/Barnes.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lee & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Barnes (Inspector of Taxes) v Hely Hutchinson The respondent was a preference shareholder in an Indian company. The Indian company was a shareholder in two English companies, the profits of each of which had suffered taxation.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-08-16', 'TAXATION'),
(5698, 'Baxter v F W Gapp & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Baxter v F W Gapp.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barnard Taylor & Douglas-Mann., Nordon & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Baxter v F W Gapp & Co Ltd The defendant, an estate agent, was sued for negligence in making a valuation of property for the purpose of an advance by way of mortgage.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-02-14', 'TORTS'),
(5699, 'Baxter v F W Gapp & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Baxter v F W Gapp.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barnard Taylor & Douglas-Mann., Nordon & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Baxter v F W Gapp & Co Ltd The defendant, an estate agent, was sued for negligence in making a valuation of property for the purpose of an advance by way of mortgage.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-02-14', 'TORTS'),
(5700, 'Beauchamp v Frome Rural District Council', '', '../links/cases/Beauchamp v Frome Rural District Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Robbins Olivery & Lake., Nalder Littler & Addleshaw.., Willcocks & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Beauchamp v Frome Rural District Council The plaintiffs were the owners in fee simple and the tenant of a farm which had been sold to their predecessors in title in 1923.', 'J MacGillivray Asher Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-12', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5701, 'Beauchamp v National Mutual Indemnity Insurance Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Beauchamp v National Mutual Indemnity Insurance Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'J Arnold Brierley & Robinson., Boote Dutton & Whittaker', '05-0', 'High Court', 'Beauchamp v National Mutual Indemnity Insurance Co Ltd A builder who had not previously undertaken any demolition work took out a policy of insurance to cover the demolition of a mill.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'INSURANCE'),
(5702, 'Benn v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Benn v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Blundell Baker & Co., Jonathan Knowles & Cox', '06-1', 'High Court', 'Benn v Inland Revenue Commissioners The appellant, a shareholder in a company, received in 1923 two dividends less income tax deducted by the company, such dividends being the distribution of profits received by the company from foreign possessions in the first year of its existence.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'TAXATION'),
(5703, 'Bennet (Inspector of Taxes) v Marshall', '', '../links/cases/bennet vrs marshall.pdf', 'Yes', 'Waltons & Co., A F & R W Tweedie', '03-1', 'Supreme', 'Bennet (Inspector of Taxes) v Marshall The respondent, who was resident in the United Kingdom, was vice-president of a company incorporated in the United States of America.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'TAXATION'),
(5704, 'Beresford v Royal Insurance Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Beresford v Royal Insurance Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sutton Ommanney & Oliver., Soames Edwards & Jones', '05-2', 'High Court', 'Beresford v Royal Insurance Co Ltd In this case there is a conflict between two grounds of public policy. The first is the duty of the court to enforce contracts and the other that no man or his estate is allowed to benefit by his own crime, or, as it may be more aptly put here, no man is allowed to insure himself against the commission of a crime.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5705, 'Beresford v Royal Insurance Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Beresford v Royal Insurance Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sutton Ommanney & Oliver., Soames Edwards & Jones', '05-2', 'High Court', 'Beresford v Royal Insurance Co Ltd In this case there is a conflict between two grounds of public policy. The first is the duty of the court to enforce contracts and the other that no man or his estate is allowed to benefit by his own crime, or, as it may be more aptly put here, no man is allowed to insure himself against the commission of a crime.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5706, 'Bessler, Waechter, Glover & Co v South Derwent Coal Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Bessler.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bentleys Stokes & Lowless., Bramwell Clayton & Clayton., King Wigg & Brightman', '12-1', 'Appeal', 'Bessler, Waechter, Glover & Co v South Derwent Coal Co Ltd The claimants made three separate contracts for the supply of coal by the respondents. Deliveries under the first contract were to be made from 1 April 1935 to 31 December 1935; under the second, from 1 January 1936 to 30 June 1936; and under the third, from 1 April 1936 to 31 December 1936; that is, there would be double deliveries between 1 April 1936 and 30 June 1936.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'CONTRACT'),
(5707, 'Betty & Tom Ltd v Southern Essex Assessment Committee', '', '../links/cases/Betty vrs southern essex.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barlow Lyde & Gilbert., Ponsford & Devenish', '06-1', 'High Court', 'Betty & Tom Ltd v Southern Essex Assessment Committee As a result of severe injuries to the brain sustained through negligence for which the defendant admitted liability, a bricklayer, aged 32, who had formerly led a vigorous, happy and healthy life, became very nearly a hopeless lunatic, who, for the rest of his life, would require nursing attendance day and night.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'TORTS'),
(5708, 'Bird & Co (London) Ltd v Thomas Cook & Son Ltd, and Thomas Cook & Son (Bankers) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Bird vrs Thomas cook.pdf', 'Yes', 'William Charles Crocker., Stanley & Co.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Bird & Co (London) Ltd v Thomas Cook & Son Ltd, and Thomas Cook & Son (Bankers) Ltd Thomas Cook & Son Ltd carried on a tourist and ticket business, and Thomas Cook & Son (Bankers) Ltd, an allied but quite separate company, carried on a money-changing business in the same room.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-16', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5709, 'Blee v London & North Eastern Railway Co', '', '../links/cases/Blee v London.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pattinson & Brewer., I B Pritchard', '1937', 'High Court', 'Blee v London & North Eastern Railway Co On 21 January 1935, a workman finished his ordinary day’s work at 5.15 pm, and in the normal way would have started work again at 7.20 am on the following day. At 10.30 pm on that same evening, in accordance with his contract of service, he was called for emergency duty, and was knocked down by a motor car while crossing the street on his way to work.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5710, 'Bowles v Bowles', '', '../links/cases/Bowles v Bowles.pdf', 'Yes', 'Seton Emmett & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Bowles v Bowles By a post-nuptial settlement a fund, which was all brought in by the wife or her father, was to be held upon trust for the wife for life, and subject thereto for the husband for life, but only if there should be issue of the marriage living at the death of the wife, and if there should be no issue of the marriage upon certain trusts in favour of the wife’s two sisters and their children.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-01-03', 'FAMILY'),
(5711, 'Briggs v Parsloe and Others', '', '../links/cases/Briggs v Parsloe and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Thompson Quarrell & Co., Collyer-Bristow & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Briggs v Parsloe and Others A testator by his will and codicil appointed W, B and H trustees and directed the income of his residuary estate to be paid to his son H S for life and after the death of H S his wife was to receive an annuity out of residue during widowhood and thereafter a similar annuity was to be paid to the daughter of H S.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-01', 'TRUSTS'),
(5712, 'British Industrial Plastics Ltd v Ferguson', '', '../links/cases/British Industrial Plastics Ltd v Ferguson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crane & Hawkins., Charles G Bradshaw & Waterson', '1938', 'High Court', 'British Industrial Plastics Ltd v Ferguson The defendant D had been employed by the plaintiffs for many years. In 1932, he left their employ, and thereafter entered into a leaving agreement with them whereby he undertook, inter alia, until 31 March 1934, not to interest himself directly or indirectly in the manufacture or sale of certain chemicals which were used in a secret process of the plaintiffs.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-11', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5713, 'British Industrial Plastics Ltd v Ferguson', '', '../links/cases/British Industrial Plastics Ltd v Ferguson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crane & Hawkins., Charles G Bradshaw & Waterson', '1938', 'High Court', 'British Industrial Plastics Ltd v Ferguson The defendant D had been employed by the plaintiffs for many years. In 1932, he left their employ, and thereafter entered into a leaving agreement with them whereby he undertook, inter alia, until 31 March 1934, not to interest himself directly or indirectly in the manufacture or sale of certain chemicals which were used in a secret process of the plaintiffs.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-11', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5714, 'British Salmson Aero Engines Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '', 'Yes', '', '1937', 'High Court', 'British Salmson Aero Engines Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners Under an agreement whereby the appellant company was granted the exclusive right for 10 years to construct, use and sell in the United Kingdom and the Dominions certain engines, the appellant company was to pay as consideration for the licence so granted £25,000, payable as to £15,000 on the signing of the agreement, as to £5,000 six months after the signing of the agreement, and as to £5,000 twelve months after the signing of the agreement.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-22', 'TAXATION'),
(5715, 'British Salmson Aero Engines Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '', 'Yes', '', '1937', 'High Court', 'British Salmson Aero Engines Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners Under an agreement whereby the appellant company was granted the exclusive right for 10 years to construct, use and sell in the United Kingdom and the Dominions certain engines, the appellant company was to pay as consideration for the licence so granted £25,000, payable as to £15,000 on the signing of the agreement, as to £5,000 six months after the signing of the agreement, and as to £5,000 twelve months after the signing of the agreement.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-22', 'TAXATION'),
(5716, 'British Sugar Manufacturers Ltd v Harris (Inspector of Taxes)', '', '../links/cases/British Sugar Manufacturers Ltd v Harris.pdf', 'Yes', 'Godden Holme & Ward', '1937', 'Supreme', 'British Sugar Manufacturers Ltd v Harris (Inspector of Taxes) The judgment in this case proceeds upon the statement in the judgment of the Privy Council in the Pondicherry case that “a payment out of profits and conditional upon profits being earned cannot accurately be described as a payment made to earn profits.â€', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-23', 'TAXATION'),
(5717, 'British & French Trust Corporation v New Brunswick Railway Co', '', '../links/cases/British.pdf', 'Yes', 'Allen & Overy., Linklaters & Paines', '1937', 'High Court', 'British & French Trust Corporation v New Brunswick Railway Co The defendants, a Canadian corporation, registered under the laws of New Brunswick, issued on 1 August 1884, 6,000 first mortgage gold bonds of like amount, tenor, and date. The bonds were secured by a mortgage trust deed, and all became due on 1 August 1934.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-22', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5718, 'Briton Ferry Steel Co Ltd v Barry', '', '../links/cases/Briton Ferry Steel Co Ltd v Barry.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ingledew Sons & Brown., Swansea', '1938', 'High Court', 'Briton Ferry Steel Co Ltd v Barry The appellant company until 1934 was mainly concerned with the manufacture of steel bars, and the conversion of these bars into blackplate and tinplate was carried out by subsidiary companies.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-03', 'TAXATION'),
(5719, 'Brown v Adamson', '', '../links/cases/Brown v Adamson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Brown v Adamson A widower, who had no female relative of his own, or of his deceased wife, able and willing to keep his house, had employed a female person for that purpose.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-15', 'TAXATION'),
(5720, 'Brown v New Empress Saloons Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Brown v New Empress Saloons Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Stanley & Co., North & Son', '1937', 'High Court', 'Brown v New Empress Saloons Ltd The plaintiff was a passenger in a motor coach owned by the defendant company, when the coach was involved in a collision in which the plaintiff was injured. The defendant company admitted the collision, but denied negligence and liability.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-10', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5721, 'Burden v Harris', '', '../links/cases/Burden v Harris.pdf', 'Yes', 'Leslie Marrison., Percy Bono & Griffith', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Burden v Harris The plaintiff, having won a bet with the defendant, a bookmaker, had difficulty in obtaining payment, and ultimately the defendant promised to pay by instalments in consideration of the plaintiff not reporting him to Tattersalls Committee.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-25', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(5722, 'Burden v Harris', '', '../links/cases/Burden v Harris.pdf', 'Yes', 'Leslie Marrison., Percy Bono & Griffith', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Burden v Harris The plaintiff, having won a bet with the defendant, a bookmaker, had difficulty in obtaining payment, and ultimately the defendant promised to pay by instalments in consideration of the plaintiff not reporting him to Tattersalls Committee.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-25', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(5723, 'Bush v Bush', '', '../links/cases/Bush v Bush.pdf', 'Yes', 'Edgar H Hiscocks', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Bush v Bush A husband deserted his wife on 5 December 1933. On 5 June 1936, exactly 2½ years after the date of the desertion, the wife presented a petition for divorce founded on adultery.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-30', 'PROBATE DIVORCE AND ADMIRALTY DIVISION'),
(5724, 'Bynoe v General Federation of Trades Unions Approved Society (110)', '', '../links/cases/Bynoe v General Federation of Trades Unions Approved Society.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hardy Bain & Co., Vivian J Williams & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Bynoe v General Federation of Trades Unions Approved Society The plaintiff, a legally qualified and registered medical practitioner, whose name was not on the dentists’ register, gave dental treatment to a member of the defendant society, an approved society within the National Health Insurance Acts 1924 to 1932.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-18', 'PROFESSIONS'),
(5725, 'Byrne v Deane', '', '../links/cases/Byrne v Deane.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barnes & Butler., Hillman & Sons', '1937', 'High Court', 'Byrne v Deane The plaintiff was a member of a club in which there had been some gambling machines. As a result of a complaint being made to the police, the machines were removed.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-02', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5726, 'Byrne v Deane', '', '../links/cases/Byrne v Deane.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barnes & Butler., Hillman & Sons', '1937', 'High Court', 'Byrne v Deane The plaintiff was a member of a club in which there had been some gambling machines. As a result of a complaint being made to the police, the machines were removed.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-02', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5727, 'Carey v Ocean Coal Company Limited', '', '../links/cases/Carey v Ocean Coal Company Limited.pdf', 'Yes', 'Furniss Stephen & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Carey v Ocean Coal Company Limited The respondents, as owners of a mine, and the agent and manager thereof, were charged with unlawfully contravening the Coal Mines Act 1911, s 55, in that all exposed and dangerous parts of machinery used in or about the mine, to wit, the return end of a belt conveyor, were not kept securely fenced.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-25', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5728, 'Carey v Ocean Coal Company Limited', '', '../links/cases/Carey v Ocean Coal Company Limited.pdf', 'Yes', 'Furniss Stephen & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Carey v Ocean Coal Company Limited The respondents, as owners of a mine, and the agent and manager thereof, were charged with unlawfully contravening the Coal Mines Act 1911, s 55, in that all exposed and dangerous parts of machinery used in or about the mine, to wit, the return end of a belt conveyor, were not kept securely fenced.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-25', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5729, 'Carruth v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Carruth v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Nordon & Co., William Morris', '1937', 'High Court', 'Carruth v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd The respondent company, which was incorporated with a capital of £95,000,000 consisting of cumulative preference, ordinary and deferred shares, petitioned the court to sanction a reduction of capital to £89,565,859 by cancellation of half the amount of each of the 21,736,564 deferred shares of 10s each, and by conversion and consolidation of each four deferred shares into one £1 ordinary share carrying full dividend rights as from 1 January 1935.', 'Michael Morris Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-25', 'COMPANY'),
(5730, 'Carruth v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Carruth v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Nordon & Co., William Morris', '1937', 'High Court', 'Carruth v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd The respondent company, which was incorporated with a capital of £95,000,000 consisting of cumulative preference, ordinary and deferred shares, petitioned the court to sanction a reduction of capital to £89,565,859 by cancellation of half the amount of each of the 21,736,564 deferred shares of 10s each, and by conversion and consolidation of each four deferred shares into one £1 ordinary share carrying full dividend rights as from 1 January 1935.', 'Michael Morris Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-25', 'COMPANY'),
(5731, 'Cartwright v Lilleshall Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Cartwright v Lilleshall Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Peacock & Goddard., Elliot Smith & Co., Sharpe Pritchard.,Willcock Taylor & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Cartwright v Lilleshall Co Ltd The appellants applied to the registrar under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act 1925, s 19(2), for the appointment of a medical referee.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-01', 'HEALTH'),
(5732, 'Cartwright v Lilleshall Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Cartwright v Lilleshall Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Peacock & Goddard., Elliot Smith & Co., Sharpe Pritchard.,Willcock Taylor & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Cartwright v Lilleshall Co Ltd The appellants applied to the registrar under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act 1925, s 19(2), for the appointment of a medical referee.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-01', 'HEALTH'),
(5733, 'Caxton Publishing Co Ltd v Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Caxton Publishing Co Ltd v Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Oswald Hickson Collier & Co., White & Leonard & Nicholls & Co', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Caxton Publishing Co Ltd v Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd In an action for an alleged infringement of the plaintiffs’ copyright in a certain publication, the plaintiffs claimed, inter alia, an inquiry as to (i) damages suffered by reason of the infringement, and (ii) damages for conversion.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-17', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(5734, 'Chappell v Chappell', '', '', 'Yes', 'Kimbers Williams Sweetland & Stinson., Ernest A Kite', '1938', 'High Court', 'Chappell v Chappell The Matrimonial Causes Act 1937, s 9, gives a party against whom a decree nisi has been given a right to apply to have that decree made absolute after the expiration of 3 months from the earliest date on which the party obtaining the decree could have made such an application.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-10-19', 'FAMILY'),
(5735, 'Chappell v Chappell', '', '', 'Yes', 'Kimbers Williams Sweetland & Stinson., Ernest A Kite', '1938', 'High Court', 'Chappell v Chappell The Matrimonial Causes Act 1937, s 9, gives a party against whom a decree nisi has been given a right to apply to have that decree made absolute after the expiration of 3 months from the earliest date on which the party obtaining the decree could have made such an application.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-10-19', 'FAMILY'),
(5736, 'Chappell v Chappell', '', '../links/cases/Chappell v Chappell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kimbers Williams Sweetland & Stinson., Ernest A Kite', '1938', 'High Court', 'Chappell v Chappell The Matrimonial Causes Act 1937, s 9, gives a party against whom a decree nisi has been given a right to apply to have that decree made absolute after the expiration of 3 months from the earliest date on which the party obtaining the decree could have made such an application.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-10-19', 'FAMILY');
INSERT INTO `courtrulings` (`id`, `title`, `content`, `link`, `isshow`, `author`, `date`, `courttype`, `summary`, `presiding`, `casetype`, `subjectmatter`, `caseno`, `counsel1`, `counsel2`, `courtname`, `caseDate`, `subjectmattertitle`) VALUES
(5737, 'Chisholm v London Passenger Transport Board', '', '../links/cases/Chisholm v London Passenger Transport Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gardiner & Co', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Chisholm v London Passenger Transport Board The plaintiff, crossing the street at a road intersection controlled by traffic lights, was injured by an omnibus, which had at the time of the accident crossed the intersection.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-12', 'TRANSPORT'),
(5738, 'Chung Chi Cheung v R', '', '../links/cases/Chung Chi Cheung v R.pdf', 'Yes', 'Reid Sharman & Co., Burchells', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Chung Chi Cheung v R The appellant, a cabin boy on board the Cheung Keng, an armed customs cruiser in the service of the republic of China, shot and killed the captain of the cruiser, seriously wounded the chief officer, and finally shot and wounded himself.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-18', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5739, 'Chung Chi Cheung v R', '', '../links/cases/Chung Chi Cheung v R.pdf', 'Yes', 'Reid Sharman & Co., Burchells', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Chung Chi Cheung v R The appellant, a cabin boy on board the Cheung Keng, an armed customs cruiser in the service of the republic of China, shot and killed the captain of the cruiser, seriously wounded the chief officer, and finally shot and wounded himself.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-18', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5740, 'Coates and Another v Rawtenstall Borough Council', '', '../links/cases/Coates and Another v Rawtenstall Borough Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Oddie & Roebuck., Procter & Son', '1937', 'High Court', 'Coates and Another v Rawtenstall Borough Council The defendant council maintained a children’s recreation ground, upon which were devices for the amusement of children, and, inter alia, a chute or children’s slide.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-13', 'TORTS'),
(5741, 'Collins v Feltham Urban District Council', '', '../links/cases/Collins v Feltham Urban District Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Vivian J Williams & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Collins v Feltham Urban District Council The Town and Country Planning Act 1932, s 10(6), provides for compensation where land suitable for immediate development is reserved for an open space.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-26', 'TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING'),
(5742, 'Collins (Inspector of Taxes) v Joseph Adamson & Co', '', '../links/cases/Collins.pdf', 'Yes', 'J M B Stubbs', '1937', 'High Court', 'Collins (Inspector of Taxes) v Joseph Adamson & Co An association was formed for the purpose of maintaining prices of boilers, and as part of its operations it applied a part of its funds in one case to the purchase of (a) a business, which was thereupon wound up, (b) its plant, which was thereupon destroyed, and (c) a covenant preventing future competition, and, in a second case, for the acquisition of shares in a company, to obtain control thereof and to secure it as an active member of the association.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-19', 'COMPANY'),
(5743, 'Collins (Inspector of Taxes) v Joseph Adamson & Co', '', '../links/cases/Collins.pdf', 'Yes', 'J M B Stubbs', '1937', 'High Court', 'Collins (Inspector of Taxes) v Joseph Adamson & Co An association was formed for the purpose of maintaining prices of boilers, and as part of its operations it applied a part of its funds in one case to the purchase of (a) a business, which was thereupon wound up, (b) its plant, which was thereupon destroyed, and (c) a covenant preventing future competition, and, in a second case, for the acquisition of shares in a company, to obtain control thereof and to secure it as an active member of the association.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-19', 'COMPANY'),
(5744, 'Collyer (Inspector of Taxes) v Hoare & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Collyer vrs hoare and co ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Godden Holme & Ward', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Collyer (Inspector of Taxes) v Hoare & Co Ltd The respondent company from time to time purchased or acquired leases of licensed houses, which it let to tenants who were tied to the company for all the beer, wines and spirits sold in the premises let.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-18', 'TAXATION'),
(5745, 'Collyer (Inspector of Taxes) v Hoare & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Collyer vrs hoare and co ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Godden Holme & Ward', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Collyer (Inspector of Taxes) v Hoare & Co Ltd The respondent company from time to time purchased or acquired leases of licensed houses, which it let to tenants who were tied to the company for all the beer, wines and spirits sold in the premises let.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-18', 'TAXATION'),
(5746, 'Coltness Iron Co Ltd v Sharp', '', '../links/cases/Coltness Iron Co Ltd v Sharp.pdf', 'Yes', 'Beveridge & Co., W & J Burness., Herbert Z Deane & Co., Edinburgh', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Coltness Iron Co Ltd v Sharp The respondent, whilst employed underground in the appellant company’s colliery, sustained serious injuries to his right hand, when it was caught in certain machinery.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-19', 'TORTS'),
(5747, 'Commercial Union Assurance Company Limited v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Commercial Union Assurance Company Limited v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Coward Chance & Co.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Commercial Union Assurance Company Limited v Inland Revenue Commissioners The material question in the present case was whether the effecting of a policy of the kind here in question was in substance a sale and purchase of an annuity, so as to attract ad valorem conveyance duty.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-19', 'INSURANCE'),
(5748, 'Commercial Union Assurance Company Limited v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Commercial Union Assurance Company Limited v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Coward Chance & Co.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Commercial Union Assurance Company Limited v Inland Revenue Commissioners The material question in the present case was whether the effecting of a policy of the kind here in question was in substance a sale and purchase of an annuity, so as to attract ad valorem conveyance duty.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-19', 'INSURANCE'),
(5749, 'Compania Naviera Vascongada v Steamship or Vessel Cristina and All Persons Claiming an Interest Therein', '', '../links/cases/Compania Naviera Vascongada v Steamship or Vessel Cristina and All Persons Claiming an Interest Therein.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ince Roscoe Wilson & Glover., Petch & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Compania Naviera Vascongada v Steamship or Vessel Cristina and All Persons Claiming an Interest Therein The plaintiffs were the owners of the Cristina, a ship registered at Bilbao. The Spanish government issued a decree requisitioning all vessels registered at Bilbao.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-08', 'SHIPPING'),
(5750, 'Compania Naviera Vascongada v Steamship or Vessel Cristina and All Persons Claiming an Interest Therein', '', '../links/cases/Compania Naviera Vascongada v Steamship or Vessel Cristina and All Persons Claiming an Interest Therein.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ince Roscoe Wilson & Glover., Petch & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Compania Naviera Vascongada v Steamship or Vessel Cristina and All Persons Claiming an Interest Therein The plaintiffs were the owners of the Cristina, a ship registered at Bilbao. The Spanish government issued a decree requisitioning all vessels registered at Bilbao.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-08', 'SHIPPING'),
(5751, 'Consolidated Entertainments Ltd v Taylor', '', '../links/cases/Consolidated Entertainments Ltd v Taylor.pdf', 'Yes', 'J R Cort Bathurst., C R Enever & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Consolidated Entertainments Ltd v Taylor The defendant was in November 1934, appointed receiver and manager of a company, which was the lessee of a cinema. As such receiver he paid the rent for the December quarter.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-16', 'COMPANY'),
(5752, 'Consolidated Entertainments Ltd v Taylor', '', '../links/cases/Consolidated Entertainments Ltd v Taylor.pdf', 'Yes', 'J R Cort Bathurst., C R Enever & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Consolidated Entertainments Ltd v Taylor The defendant was in November 1934, appointed receiver and manager of a company, which was the lessee of a cinema. As such receiver he paid the rent for the December quarter.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-16', 'COMPANY'),
(5753, 'Conybear v British Briquettes Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Conybear v British Briquettes Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Vivian J Williams & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Conybear v British Briquettes Ltd Those in control of the defendant company were desirous of converting it into a private company, and the plaintiffs were anxious to prevent this being done.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-27', 'COMPANY'),
(5754, 'Corbett v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Corbett v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Tamplin Joseph Ponsonby Ryde & Flux', '1937', 'High Court', 'Corbett v Inland Revenue Commissioners The appellant was assessed to sur-tax for the year ending 5 April 1935, in a sum which included a sum of £17,073, being the gross equivalent of a sum of £13,600 13s 9d, placed to the credit of the appellant’s wife by the executors of her late father’s will, under which she was entitled to three-fifths of the residue of his estate for life.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-27', 'TAXATION'),
(5755, 'Corbett v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Corbett v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Tamplin Joseph Ponsonby Ryde & Flux', '1937', 'High Court', 'Corbett v Inland Revenue Commissioners The appellant was assessed to sur-tax for the year ending 5 April 1935, in a sum which included a sum of £17,073, being the gross equivalent of a sum of £13,600 13s 9d, placed to the credit of the appellant’s wife by the executors of her late father’s will, under which she was entitled to three-fifths of the residue of his estate for life.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-27', 'TAXATION'),
(5756, 'Cottingham’s Executors v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Cottingham.pdf', 'Yes', 'Allen & Overy., Linklaters & Paines', '1938', 'High Court', 'Cottingham’s Executors v Inland Revenue Commissioners The Court of Appeal dismissed, with costs, an appeal in this case from the order made by Lawrence J, dated 5 July 1938. Sir Wilfrid Greene MR stated that he desired to adopt the judgment of Lawrence J, as it so completely covered the ground that it was unnecessary to say more.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-30', 'TAXATION'),
(5757, 'Cottingham’s Executors v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Cottingham.pdf', 'Yes', 'Allen & Overy., Linklaters & Paines', '1938', 'High Court', 'Cottingham’s Executors v Inland Revenue Commissioners The Court of Appeal dismissed, with costs, an appeal in this case from the order made by Lawrence J, dated 5 July 1938. Sir Wilfrid Greene MR stated that he desired to adopt the judgment of Lawrence J, as it so completely covered the ground that it was unnecessary to say more.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-30', 'TAXATION'),
(5758, 'Craig v Dover Navigation Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Craig v Dover Navigation Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barnett Janner., Winskell & Walker., Botterell & Roche', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Craig v Dover Navigation Co Ltd The deceased had been employed as a sailor on a ship that was sent up a mosquito-infested river in West Africa. It was found that his death was due to yellow fever and/or malaria caused by mosquito bites.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-28', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5759, 'Craig v Dover Navigation Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Craig v Dover Navigation Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barnett Janner., Winskell & Walker., Botterell & Roche', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Craig v Dover Navigation Co Ltd The deceased had been employed as a sailor on a ship that was sent up a mosquito-infested river in West Africa. It was found that his death was due to yellow fever and/or malaria caused by mosquito bites.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-28', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5760, 'Cross (Inspector of Taxes) v London & Provincial Trust Ltd', '', '', 'Yes', 'Linklaters & Paines', '1937', 'High Court', 'Cross (Inspector of Taxes) v London & Provincial Trust Ltd Income Tax – Income arising from securities – Foreign bonds – Payment of interest suspended – Issue of funding bonds in place of interest – Sale of funding bonds – Liability to tax on proceeds of sale.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-30', 'TAXATION'),
(5761, 'Croston v Vaughan', '', '../links/cases/Croston v Vaughan.pdf', 'Yes', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', '1937', 'High Court', 'Croston v Vaughan The appellant and respondent were defendants in an action for damages for personal injuries caused by negligence. The appellant had suddenly and violently applied her brakes while driving her motor car in a stream of traffic.', 'Amery-Parkes & Co., William Charles Croc', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-27', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(5762, 'Croston v Vaughan', '', '../links/cases/Croston v Vaughan.pdf', 'Yes', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', '1937', 'High Court', 'Croston v Vaughan The appellant and respondent were defendants in an action for damages for personal injuries caused by negligence. The appellant had suddenly and violently applied her brakes while driving her motor car in a stream of traffic.', 'Amery-Parkes & Co., William Charles Croc', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-27', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(5763, 'D Bates & Co v Dale', '', '../links/cases/D Bates vrs dale.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hollinshead & Moody., Preston Lane-Claypon & O’Kelly.,Bowcock & Pursaill', '', 'Appeal', 'D Bates & Co v Dale The defendant carried on business as an accountant in Leek, Staffordshire, having some 60 or 70 clients. He was not a qualified accountant and, desiring to be associated with a firm of accountants, the partners in which had professional qualifications, he sold his business to the plaintiffs, a firm practising in the Potteries.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'COMPETITION'),
(5764, 'D/SA/S Gulnes v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd', '', '../links/cases/D.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sinclair Roche & Temperley., William Morris', '1937', 'High Court', 'D/SA/S Gulnes v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd The defendants chartered from the plaintiffs a ship to proceed to San Juan, a port close to Seville in Spain, and there to load a cargo of ore. On account of the war in Spain, the following marginal clause was inserted in the charterparty:', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-30', 'SHIPPING'),
(5765, 'Dalton v Adelphi Club Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Dalton v Adelphi Club Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bernard Linder & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Dalton v Adelphi Club Ltd The respondents allowed a game called stud poker to be played upon their premises. This game is played by first dealing to each player one card face downwards, and then four cards face upwards. As each round of cards is dealt the player pays a stake into the pool or drops out of the game.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-29', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(5766, 'Dalton v Adelphi Club Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Dalton v Adelphi Club Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bernard Linder & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Dalton v Adelphi Club Ltd The respondents allowed a game called stud poker to be played upon their premises. This game is played by first dealing to each player one card face downwards, and then four cards face upwards. As each round of cards is dealt the player pays a stake into the pool or drops out of the game.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-29', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(5767, 'Dann v Hamilton', '', '../links/cases/Dann v Hamilton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Howe Browne', '1938', 'High Court', 'Dann v Hamilton The plaintiff was injured while travelling as a non-paying passenger in a car driven by one H. Prior to the accident H had been drinking, and this had markedly affected his driving, which thereafter was fast and erratic. During a stop to let down a passenger, the plaintiff, who by then knew that H, while far from being dead drunk, was not sober, and that there was a certain danger in being a passenger in a car driven by him, had an opportunity of leaving the car, but elected to continue the journey.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-19', 'TORTS'),
(5768, 'Dann v Hamilton', '', '../links/cases/Dann v Hamilton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Howe Browne', '1938', 'High Court', 'Dann v Hamilton The plaintiff was injured while travelling as a non-paying passenger in a car driven by one H. Prior to the accident H had been drinking, and this had markedly affected his driving, which thereafter was fast and erratic. During a stop to let down a passenger, the plaintiff, who by then knew that H, while far from being dead drunk, was not sober, and that there was a certain danger in being a passenger in a car driven by him, had an opportunity of leaving the car, but elected to continue the journey.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-19', 'TORTS'),
(5769, 'Davies and Another v Hosken', '', '../links/cases/Davies and Another v Hosken.pdf', 'Yes', 'Cropley Davies & Son', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Davies and Another v Hosken Certain solicitors had taken out an insurance policy against loss arising from any claim which might be made against them by reason of any “neglect, omission or errorâ€ committed on the part of the solicitors, or any person employed by them, in or about the conduct of any business conducted by or on behalf of the solicitors in their professional capacity as solicitors.', 'Malcolm Logan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-28', 'INSURANCE'),
(5770, 'Davies and Another v Hosken', '', '../links/cases/Davies and Another v Hosken.pdf', 'Yes', 'Cropley Davies & Son', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Davies and Another v Hosken Certain solicitors had taken out an insurance policy against loss arising from any claim which might be made against them by reason of any “neglect, omission or errorâ€ committed on the part of the solicitors, or any person employed by them, in or about the conduct of any business conducted by or on behalf of the solicitors in their professional capacity as solicitors.', 'Malcolm Logan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-28', 'INSURANCE'),
(5771, 'Davies v Elmslie', '', '../links/cases/Davies v Elmslie.pdf', 'Yes', 'Piesse & Sons., Peacock & Goddard., Shakespeare & Vernon.,B D J Hayes', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Davies v Elmslie The defendant, in consideration of the plaintiff persuading her husband to go to New Zealand and/or consenting to forgo the consortium of her husband, promised to pay to the plaintiff an allowance of £4 per week until either the defendant should pay the plaintiff’s fare to join her husband or her husband’s fare back to England.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-15', 'CONTRACT'),
(5772, 'Dawson and Another v Counsell', '', '../links/cases/Dawson and Another v Counsell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Rustons & Lloyd.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Dawson and Another v Counsell The appellants carried on business in partnership, the partnership’s sole asset being a brood mare and her progeny.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'TAXATION'),
(5773, 'De Choisy v Hynes', '', '../links/cases/De Choisy v Hynes.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crossman Block & Co., Tebbs & Son., Wedlake Letts & Birds.,Alexander Farr & Son', '1937', 'Appeal', 'De Choisy v Hynes The plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant for the sale to him of the whole issued share capital of a private company and of certain freehold premises.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-15', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(5774, 'De Choisy v Hynes', '', '../links/cases/De Choisy v Hynes.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crossman Block & Co., Tebbs & Son., Wedlake Letts & Birds.,Alexander Farr & Son', '1937', 'Appeal', 'De Choisy v Hynes The plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant for the sale to him of the whole issued share capital of a private company and of certain freehold premises.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-15', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(5775, 'De Stempel v Dunkels', '', '../links/cases/De Stempel v Dunkels.pdf', 'Yes', 'D Langton & Passmore., Wordsworth Marr Johnson & Shaw', '1937', 'High Court', 'De Stempel v Dunkels The plaintiff was employed by D, a member of the Diamond Corporation, under an agreement for a year beginning on 1 January 1928.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-25', 'CONTRACT'),
(5776, 'De Stempel v Dunkels', '', '../links/cases/De Stempel v Dunkels.pdf', 'Yes', 'D Langton & Passmore., Wordsworth Marr Johnson & Shaw', '1937', 'High Court', 'De Stempel v Dunkels The plaintiff was employed by D, a member of the Diamond Corporation, under an agreement for a year beginning on 1 January 1928.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-25', 'CONTRACT'),
(5777, 'Brown v Adamson', '', '../links/cases/Derek H Kitchin Esq.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Brown v Adamson A widower, who had no female relative of his own, or of his deceased wife, able and willing to keep his house, had employed a female person for that purpose.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-15', 'TAXATION'),
(5778, 'Brown v Adamson', '', '../links/cases/Derek H Kitchin Esq.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Brown v Adamson A widower, who had no female relative of his own, or of his deceased wife, able and willing to keep his house, had employed a female person for that purpose.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-15', 'TAXATION'),
(5779, 'Dermody v Higgs & Hill Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Dermody v Higgs.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bryan O’Connor & Co., Dennes & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Dermody v Higgs & Hill Ltd A workman was employed by the respondents in road-making. The driver of an engine belonging to his employers had difficulty in starting the engine, and the workman went to assist him. The engine backfired, with the result that the workman’s wrist was broken.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-10', 'HEALTH'),
(5780, 'Dermody v Higgs & Hill Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Dermody v Higgs.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bryan O’Connor & Co., Dennes & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Dermody v Higgs & Hill Ltd A workman was employed by the respondents in road-making. The driver of an engine belonging to his employers had difficulty in starting the engine, and the workman went to assist him. The engine backfired, with the result that the workman’s wrist was broken.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-10', 'HEALTH'),
(5781, 'Domine v Grimsdall', '', '../links/cases/Domine v Grimsdall.pdf', 'Yes', 'E Baring Gomm & Co.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Domine v Grimsdall The plaintiff recovered judgment against C for a certain sum, the order providing for payment by instalments and providing that, in the case of default in payment of any instalment, execution might issue for the whole debt and costs remaining unpaid.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-24', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5782, 'Domine v Grimsdall', '', '../links/cases/Domine v Grimsdall.pdf', 'Yes', 'E Baring Gomm & Co.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Domine v Grimsdall The plaintiff recovered judgment against C for a certain sum, the order providing for payment by instalments and providing that, in the case of default in payment of any instalment, execution might issue for the whole debt and costs remaining unpaid.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-24', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5783, 'Donoghue v Allied Newspapers Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Donoghue v Allied Newspapers Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'W H Court & Son., Theodore Goddard & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Donoghue v Allied Newspapers Ltd A series of articles entitled “[the plaintiff’s] racing secretsâ€ was published in a newspaper. The plaintiff had done none of the actual writing of any of the articles, but he had related his experiences to F, who had made notes from which F had written up the articles.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-06', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(5784, 'Donoghue v Allied Newspapers Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Donoghue v Allied Newspapers Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'W H Court & Son., Theodore Goddard & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Donoghue v Allied Newspapers Ltd A series of articles entitled “[the plaintiff’s] racing secretsâ€ was published in a newspaper. The plaintiff had done none of the actual writing of any of the articles, but he had related his experiences to F, who had made notes from which F had written up the articles.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-06', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(5785, 'Doxford & Sons Ltd v Furness Shipbuilding Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Doxford.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crossman Block & Co., Dees & Thompson., Sherlock & King', '', 'Appeal', 'Doxford & Sons Ltd v Furness Shipbuilding Co Ltd The applicants were engaged in fitting Diesel engines in a vessel in the applicants’ yard. As the work was urgent, they borrowed three of the applicants’ workmen. One of the latter dropped a hammer and injured an employee of the applicants.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(5786, 'Doxford & Sons Ltd v Furness Shipbuilding Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Doxford.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crossman Block & Co., Dees & Thompson., Sherlock & King', '', 'Appeal', 'Doxford & Sons Ltd v Furness Shipbuilding Co Ltd The applicants were engaged in fitting Diesel engines in a vessel in the applicants’ yard. As the work was urgent, they borrowed three of the applicants’ workmen. One of the latter dropped a hammer and injured an employee of the applicants.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(5787, 'Dransfield v British Insulated Cables Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Dransfield v British Insulated Cables Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pattinson & Brewer', '1937', 'High Court', 'Dransfield v British Insulated Cables Ltd The defendants were the manufacturers of a bull-ring, a ring through which an overhead trolley-wire passed, and which had been supplied to a local authority to be used in their overhead system of wires.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-13', 'QUANTUM'),
(5788, 'Dransfield v British Insulated Cables Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Dransfield v British Insulated Cables Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pattinson & Brewer', '1937', 'High Court', 'Dransfield v British Insulated Cables Ltd The defendants were the manufacturers of a bull-ring, a ring through which an overhead trolley-wire passed, and which had been supplied to a local authority to be used in their overhead system of wires.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-13', 'QUANTUM'),
(5789, 'Dried Milk Products Ltd v Milk Marketing Board', '', '../links/cases/Dried Milk Products Ltd v Milk Marketing Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'Reynolds Sons & Gorst., Ellis & Fairbairn', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Dried Milk Products Ltd v Milk Marketing Board A contract was entered into on 11 September 1934, by the farmer who agreed to sell the milk, the claimants in this case, who were the purchasers, and the Milk Marketing Board. Under the contract, a notional price was agreed to be paid at the rate of 1s 5d per gallon, with a provision that the producer was to receive a rebate according to the purpose for which the milk was to be used.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-08', 'AGRICULTURE'),
(5790, 'Dried Milk Products Ltd v Milk Marketing Board', '', '../links/cases/Dried Milk Products Ltd v Milk Marketing Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'Reynolds Sons & Gorst., Ellis & Fairbairn', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Dried Milk Products Ltd v Milk Marketing Board A contract was entered into on 11 September 1934, by the farmer who agreed to sell the milk, the claimants in this case, who were the purchasers, and the Milk Marketing Board. Under the contract, a notional price was agreed to be paid at the rate of 1s 5d per gallon, with a provision that the producer was to receive a rebate according to the purpose for which the milk was to be used.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-08', 'AGRICULTURE'),
(5791, 'Duckworth v Lowe', '', '../links/cases/Duckworth v Lowe.pdf', 'Yes', 'William Webb & Sons.,', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Duckworth v Lowe The appellant was assessed to income tax in respect of War Loan interest and bank interest receivable by his wife. The appellant was not resident in the United Kingdom during any of the years for which the assessments were made.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-22', 'TAXATION'),
(5792, 'Duckworth v Lowe', '', '../links/cases/Duckworth v Lowe.pdf', 'Yes', 'William Webb & Sons.,', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Duckworth v Lowe The appellant was assessed to income tax in respect of War Loan interest and bank interest receivable by his wife. The appellant was not resident in the United Kingdom during any of the years for which the assessments were made.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-22', 'TAXATION'),
(5793, 'Dunstan v Benney', '', '../links/cases/Dunstan v Benney.pdf', 'Yes', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Dunstan v Benney A landlord gave his tenant notice to quit under the provisions of the Agricultural Holdings Act 1923, s 12, on the ground that the land was not being cultivated in accordance with the rules of good husbandry. The tenant called in a surveyor to refute this contention.', 'A J Adams & Adams., Hancock & Thrall., N', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-22', 'AGRICULTURE'),
(5794, 'Dunstan v Benney', '', '../links/cases/Dunstan v Benney.pdf', 'Yes', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Dunstan v Benney A landlord gave his tenant notice to quit under the provisions of the Agricultural Holdings Act 1923, s 12, on the ground that the land was not being cultivated in accordance with the rules of good husbandry. The tenant called in a surveyor to refute this contention.', 'A J Adams & Adams., Hancock & Thrall., N', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-22', 'AGRICULTURE'),
(5795, 'E Timm & Son Ltd v Northumbrian Shipping Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/E Timm.pdf', 'Yes', 'Clyde & Co., Middleton Lewis & Clarke.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'E Timm & Son Ltd v Northumbrian Shipping Co Ltd Under the Water Carriage of Goods Act 1910 (Canada), s 6, if the owner of any ship transporting merchandise from any port in Canada exercises due diligence to make the ship in all respects seaworthy, neither the ship nor the owner shall be held responsible for loss or damage resulting from faults or errors in navigation or in the management of the ship, or from latent defect.', 'Malcolm Logan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-29', 'SHIPPING'),
(5796, 'E Timm & Son Ltd v Northumbrian Shipping Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/E Timm.pdf', 'Yes', 'Clyde & Co., Middleton Lewis & Clarke.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'E Timm & Son Ltd v Northumbrian Shipping Co Ltd Under the Water Carriage of Goods Act 1910 (Canada), s 6, if the owner of any ship transporting merchandise from any port in Canada exercises due diligence to make the ship in all respects seaworthy, neither the ship nor the owner shall be held responsible for loss or damage resulting from faults or errors in navigation or in the management of the ship, or from latent defect.', 'Malcolm Logan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-29', 'SHIPPING'),
(5797, 'Eaton v George Wimpey & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Eaton v George Wimpey.pdf', 'Yes', 'James Turner & Son., Durnford Son & Bartle', '1937', 'High Court', 'Eaton v George Wimpey & Co Ltd In 1933, while employed by S, a workman contracted dermatitis. In 1935 he compounded his claim against S. In May 1936, he entered the employment of the appellants and on 24 July 1936, he was certified as suffering from dermatitis, and as being disabled from 15 July 1936.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-29', 'HEALTH'),
(5798, 'Eaton v George Wimpey & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Eaton v George Wimpey.pdf', 'Yes', 'James Turner & Son., Durnford Son & Bartle', '1937', 'High Court', 'Eaton v George Wimpey & Co Ltd In 1933, while employed by S, a workman contracted dermatitis. In 1935 he compounded his claim against S. In May 1936, he entered the employment of the appellants and on 24 July 1936, he was certified as suffering from dermatitis, and as being disabled from 15 July 1936.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-29', 'HEALTH'),
(5799, 'EBM Co Ltd v Dominion Bank', '', '../links/cases/EBM Co Ltd v Dominion Bank.pdf', 'Yes', 'Blake & Redden., Lawrence Jones & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'EBM Co Ltd v Dominion Bank As additional security for an advance to three partners, who, in addition to and apart from the partnership, were directors of a limited company, a bank accepted a document charging the company’s interest in certain bonds which had been deposited with the bank to meet any judgment which might be obtained against the company in then impending litigation.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-11', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5800, 'EBM Co Ltd v Dominion Bank', '', '../links/cases/EBM Co Ltd v Dominion Bank.pdf', 'Yes', 'Blake & Redden., Lawrence Jones & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'EBM Co Ltd v Dominion Bank As additional security for an advance to three partners, who, in addition to and apart from the partnership, were directors of a limited company, a bank accepted a document charging the company’s interest in certain bonds which had been deposited with the bank to meet any judgment which might be obtained against the company in then impending litigation.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-11', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5801, 'Ellerker v Union Cold Storage Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Ellerker v Union Cold Storage Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pinsent & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Ellerker v Union Cold Storage Co Ltd A company carrying on a large cold storage business for that purpose owned and occupied a number of cold stores in various parts of Great Britain. In five of these cold stores part of the building was used for the manufacture of ice for sale.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-14', 'TAXATION'),
(5802, 'Ellis v Fulham Borough Council', '', '../links/cases/Ellis v Fulham Borough Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'W Townend., Town Clerk., Tobin & Co., Fulham', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Ellis v Fulham Borough Council A borough council maintained a public paddling-pool for children. A quantity of sand had been placed at one side of the pool, some of which had silted, or been pushed under the water. A boy, the son of a ratepayer of the borough, while paddling, stepped upon a piece of glass hidden in the sand, and cut his toe.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-25', 'TORTS'),
(5803, 'Ellis v Fulham Borough Council', '', '../links/cases/Ellis v Fulham Borough Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'W Townend., Town Clerk., Tobin & Co., Fulham', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Ellis v Fulham Borough Council A borough council maintained a public paddling-pool for children. A quantity of sand had been placed at one side of the pool, some of which had silted, or been pushed under the water. A boy, the son of a ratepayer of the borough, while paddling, stepped upon a piece of glass hidden in the sand, and cut his toe.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-25', 'TORTS'),
(5804, 'ever Brothers Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/ever Brothers Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'J M B Stubbs', '1937', 'Supreme', 'ever Brothers Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners The appellant company in 1919 acquired all the issued ordinary shares of the C Co for a cash consideration. In 1936, it acquired practically all the issued preference shares, in consideration of the allotment of preference shares of the appellant company.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'COMPANY'),
(5805, 'Ewer v National Employers’ Mutual General Insurance Association Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Ewer v National Employers.pdf', 'Yes', 'De Meza & Menasse., William Charles Crocker', '1937', 'High Court', 'Ewer v National Employers’ Mutual General Insurance Association Ltd The plaintiff and S, who carried on business in partnership, bought certain premises in their joint names. In 1928 S ceased to be a partner, but the premises remained in the joint names and S from time to time lent sums of money to the plaintiff to enable the business to carry on.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-05', 'INSURANCE'),
(5806, 'Ewer v National Employers’ Mutual General Insurance Association Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Ewer v National Employers.pdf', 'Yes', 'De Meza & Menasse., William Charles Crocker', '1937', 'High Court', 'Ewer v National Employers’ Mutual General Insurance Association Ltd The plaintiff and S, who carried on business in partnership, bought certain premises in their joint names. In 1928 S ceased to be a partner, but the premises remained in the joint names and S from time to time lent sums of money to the plaintiff to enable the business to carry on.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-05', 'INSURANCE'),
(5807, 'Farquharson v Pearl Assurance Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Farquharson v Pearl Assurance Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Leader Plunkett & Leader., F G Bowles', '1937', 'High Court', 'Farquharson v Pearl Assurance Co Ltd By the terms of a policy of insurance upon the life of the assured, the policy moneys were expressed to be payable provided the insurance company received the premiums on the dates specified, and it was provided that 30 days of grace were allowed for the payment of premiums.', 'J MacGillivray Asher Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-05', 'INSURANCE'),
(5808, 'Farquharson v Pearl Assurance Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Farquharson v Pearl Assurance Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Leader Plunkett & Leader., F G Bowles', '1937', 'High Court', 'Farquharson v Pearl Assurance Co Ltd By the terms of a policy of insurance upon the life of the assured, the policy moneys were expressed to be payable provided the insurance company received the premiums on the dates specified, and it was provided that 30 days of grace were allowed for the payment of premiums.', 'J MacGillivray Asher Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-05', 'INSURANCE'),
(5809, 'Fender v Mildmay', '', '../links/cases/Fender v Mildmay.pdf', 'Yes', 'Percy Haseldine & Co., Sutton Ommanney & Oliver', '1937', 'High Court', 'Fender v Mildmay The respondent’s wife petitioned for a divorce on the ground of the respondent’s adultery with the appellant, and a decree nisi was duly pronounced. On two occasions after the pronouncement of the decree nisi, but before the decree was made absolute, the respondent promised to marry the appellant immediately after the decree had been made absolute.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-28', 'FAMILY'),
(5810, 'Fender v Mildmay', '', '../links/cases/Fender v Mildmay.pdf', 'Yes', 'Percy Haseldine & Co., Sutton Ommanney & Oliver', '1937', 'High Court', 'Fender v Mildmay The respondent’s wife petitioned for a divorce on the ground of the respondent’s adultery with the appellant, and a decree nisi was duly pronounced. On two occasions after the pronouncement of the decree nisi, but before the decree was made absolute, the respondent promised to marry the appellant immediately after the decree had been made absolute.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-28', 'FAMILY'),
(5811, 'Findlay v Newman, Hender & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Findlay v Newman.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Wellington & Clifford', '1937', 'High Court', 'Findlay v Newman, Hender & Co Ltd The respondents were charged with having failed to have certain mill gearing in their factory securely fenced, or in such position or of such construction as to be equally safe to every person employed or working in their factory, in consequence of which one of their workmen was injured.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-13', 'HEALTH'),
(5812, 'Findlay v Newman, Hender & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Findlay v Newman.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Wellington & Clifford', '1937', 'High Court', 'Findlay v Newman, Hender & Co Ltd The respondents were charged with having failed to have certain mill gearing in their factory securely fenced, or in such position or of such construction as to be equally safe to every person employed or working in their factory, in consequence of which one of their workmen was injured.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-13', 'HEALTH'),
(5813, 'Fisher v W B Dick & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Fisher v W B Dick.pdf', 'Yes', 'Percy Bono & Griffith., Linklaters & Paines', '1938', 'High Court', 'Fisher v W B Dick & Co Ltd The plaintiff entered the employment of the defendants in 1933. The managing director of the defendant company confirmed his appointment on the selling staff as and from 1 December 1933, at a commencing salary of £400 per annum plus out-of-pocket and travelling expenses.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-21', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5814, 'Fisher v W B Dick & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Fisher v W B Dick.pdf', 'Yes', 'Percy Bono & Griffith., Linklaters & Paines', '1938', 'High Court', 'Fisher v W B Dick & Co Ltd The plaintiff entered the employment of the defendants in 1933. The managing director of the defendant company confirmed his appointment on the selling staff as and from 1 December 1933, at a commencing salary of £400 per annum plus out-of-pocket and travelling expenses.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-21', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5815, 'Fox v Marshall', '', '../links/cases/Fox v Marshall.pdf', 'Yes', 'Webster Butcher & Sons., Harry Chandler', '1938', 'High Court', 'Fox v Marshall In 1928, a landlord obtained possession of a dwelling-house, which thereupon became decontrolled. He then subdivided it into two, without any structural alterations. The rateable value of the whole house was at all material times over £20 and that of each half under that value, the house being within the metropolitan police area.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-12', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(5816, 'Fox v Marshall', '', '../links/cases/Fox v Marshall.pdf', 'Yes', 'Webster Butcher & Sons., Harry Chandler', '1938', 'High Court', 'Fox v Marshall In 1928, a landlord obtained possession of a dwelling-house, which thereupon became decontrolled. He then subdivided it into two, without any structural alterations. The rateable value of the whole house was at all material times over £20 and that of each half under that value, the house being within the metropolitan police area.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-12', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(5817, 'Gabriel Wade & English Ltd v Dixon & Cardus Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Gabriel Wade.pdf', 'Yes', 'Preston Lane-Claypon & O’Kelly., Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar', '1937', 'High Court', 'Gabriel Wade & English Ltd v Dixon & Cardus Ltd Formerly considerable particularity was required in pleading a lost grant. That rule, which appears to have been considerably relaxed by the Common Law Procedure Act 1852 and in Palmer v Guadagni, seems now to be no longer in force.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'LAND '),
(5818, 'Gale v New', '', '../links/cases/Gale v New.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pennington & Son., Lemon & Humphreys., Pain & Brown', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Gale v New The plaintiff had entered into a contract with the War Office whereby he agreed “to collect during the currency of this contract the remains of exploded projectiles, practice shell, case shot and fuses lying on or about the artillery ranges … and in consideration of our being allowed to retain as our property all such remains, including metals, collected therefrom to pay annuallyâ€ an agreed sum.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-30', 'SALE OF GOODS'),
(5819, 'Gale v New', '', '../links/cases/Gale v New.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pennington & Son., Lemon & Humphreys., Pain & Brown', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Gale v New The plaintiff had entered into a contract with the War Office whereby he agreed “to collect during the currency of this contract the remains of exploded projectiles, practice shell, case shot and fuses lying on or about the artillery ranges … and in consideration of our being allowed to retain as our property all such remains, including metals, collected therefrom to pay annuallyâ€ an agreed sum.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-30', 'SALE OF GOODS'),
(5820, 'Gallagher v Lynn', '', '../links/cases/Gallagher v Lynn.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bradford Frankland & Mercer., Linklaters & Paines., Joseph Alexande', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Gallagher v Lynn The appellant was convicted for selling milk in the city of Londonderry otherwise than under and in accordance with the Milk and Milk Products Act (Northern Ireland) 1934, and without the licences required under that Act, in contravention of the provisions of s 1(1)(c) thereof.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-19', 'HEALTH'),
(5821, 'Gillett v Kent Rivers Catchment Board', '', '../links/cases/Gillett v Kent Rivers Catchment Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kramer & Co., Field Roscoe & Co., Hallett Creery & Co', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Gillett v Kent Rivers Catchment Board The plaintiffs were owners and occupiers respectively of certain land in a district for which the defendants were the drainage board. Owing, it was alleged, to the defendants’ failure to keep the sewers in a fit and proper condition, and mainly failure to clear a drain of weeds, the plaintiffs’ lands were flooded and they suffered damage to their crops.', 'F Honig Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-01', 'TORTS'),
(5822, 'Gillett v Kent Rivers Catchment Board', '', '../links/cases/Gillett v Kent Rivers Catchment Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kramer & Co., Field Roscoe & Co., Hallett Creery & Co', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Gillett v Kent Rivers Catchment Board The plaintiffs were owners and occupiers respectively of certain land in a district for which the defendants were the drainage board. Owing, it was alleged, to the defendants’ failure to keep the sewers in a fit and proper condition, and mainly failure to clear a drain of weeds, the plaintiffs’ lands were flooded and they suffered damage to their crops.', 'F Honig Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-01', 'TORTS'),
(5823, 'Gillmore v London County Council', '', '../links/cases/Gillmore v London County Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'W B Blackwell & Co., J R Howard Roberts', '1938', 'High Court', 'Gillmore v London County Council The plaintiff had joined a class in physical training organised by the defendant council, and had paid a small fee upon joining. The exercises were performed in a hall which was used for dances and of which the floor was fairly highly polished.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-07', 'EDUCATION');
INSERT INTO `courtrulings` (`id`, `title`, `content`, `link`, `isshow`, `author`, `date`, `courttype`, `summary`, `presiding`, `casetype`, `subjectmatter`, `caseno`, `counsel1`, `counsel2`, `courtname`, `caseDate`, `subjectmattertitle`) VALUES
(5824, 'Gillmore v London County Council', '', '../links/cases/Gillmore v London County Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'W B Blackwell & Co., J R Howard Roberts', '1938', 'High Court', 'Gillmore v London County Council The plaintiff had joined a class in physical training organised by the defendant council, and had paid a small fee upon joining. The exercises were performed in a hall which was used for dances and of which the floor was fairly highly polished.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-07', 'EDUCATION'),
(5825, 'Goadby v Orridge', '', '../links/cases/Goadby v Orridge.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wood & Co., Ward Bowie & Co., Duggan & Elton., Birmingham', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Goadby v Orridge An action was remitted from the High Court to the county court, no special order being made as to the costs before remission.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-08', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(5826, 'Gokal Chand-Jagan Nath (Firm) v Nand Ram Das-Atma Ram (Firm)', '', '../links/cases/Gokal Chand.pdf', 'Yes', 'R S Nehra., T L Wilson & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Gokal Chand-Jagan Nath (Firm) v Nand Ram Das-Atma Ram (Firm) The respondents, a firm of commission agents in Calcutta, were employed by the appellants, a firm of merchants, to conduct transactions for the purchase and sale of sugar and the purchase of gunny bags, between 1919 and 1922.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-10-21', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5827, 'Goldblum v Goldblum', '', '../links/cases/Goldblum v Goldblum.pdf', 'Yes', 'Thorp Saunders & Thorp., Beckingsales & Naylors', '1938', 'High Court', 'Goldblum v Goldblum On 31 October 1933, a wife presented a petition for judicial separation founded on cruelty. On 19 January 1934, the parties, in compromise of those proceedings, entered into a separation deed, and 5 days later the petition was dismissed by consent.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-21', 'FAMILY'),
(5828, 'Goldschmidt v Constable & Co', '', '../links/cases/Goldschmidt v Constable.pdf', 'Yes', 'Vandyke & Mackay., Waterhouse & Co., Beaumont & Son', '1937', 'High Court', 'Goldschmidt v Constable & Co This is an attempt by the defendant in a libel action, who pleads justification, to defer giving particulars thereof until after discovery. The court were clear that this could not be allowed.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-14', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5829, 'Governors of Queen Anne’s Bounty v Tithe Redemption Commission', '', '../links/cases/Governors of Queen Anne.pdf', 'Yes', 'J M B Stubbs', '1938', 'High Court', 'Governors of Queen Anne’s Bounty v Tithe Redemption Commission The Tithe Act 1936, abolished tithe rentcharge on 2 October 1936, but preserved the right to recover tithe rentcharge accrued due before that date, subject to the provision that after 1 April 1937, arrears could only be recovered by the tithe commission.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-11', 'ECCLESIASTICAL'),
(5830, 'Governors of Queen Anne’s Bounty v Tithe Redemption Commission', '', '../links/cases/Governors of Queen Anne.pdf', 'Yes', 'J M B Stubbs', '1938', 'High Court', 'Governors of Queen Anne’s Bounty v Tithe Redemption Commission The Tithe Act 1936, abolished tithe rentcharge on 2 October 1936, but preserved the right to recover tithe rentcharge accrued due before that date, subject to the provision that after 1 April 1937, arrears could only be recovered by the tithe commission.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-11', 'ECCLESIASTICAL'),
(5831, 'Gowers and Others v Lloyds & National Provincial Foreign Bank Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Gowers and Others v Lloyds.pdf', 'Yes', 'Linklaters & Paines', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Gowers and Others v Lloyds & National Provincial Foreign Bank Ltd G, a retired officer in the colonial customs service and in receipt of a pension, from 1916 to 1926 collected his pension from the defendant bank, with which he had an account, coming to the bank in person. In 1926 G changed his place of residence and thereafter collected his pension by post through the defendant bank by means of receipt forms sent direct to him by the plaintiffs.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-07', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5832, 'Gray (Inspector of Taxes) v Penrhyn (Lord)', '', '../links/cases/Gray vrs penryhn.pdf', 'Yes', 'A J Adams & Adams', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Gray (Inspector of Taxes) v Penrhyn (Lord) By the fraud of two quarry officials at the respondent’s quarries larger amounts were entered in the wages sheets than were due for wages.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-18', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5833, 'Great Western Railway Co v United Kingdom Chamber of Shipping', '', '../links/cases/Great Western Railway Co v United Kingdom Chamber of Shipping.pdf', 'Yes', 'Cleminson & Hill., G Cole Deacon', '1937', 'High Court', 'Great Western Railway Co v United Kingdom Chamber of Shipping The Great Western Ry Co applied to the Railway Rates Tribunal, under the Railways Act 1921, s 37(1), for leave to grant certain exceptional rates more than 40 per cent below standard, in order that its railway might compete with coastwise shipping.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-03', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5834, 'Great Western Railway Co v United Kingdom Chamber of Shipping', '', '../links/cases/Great Western Railway Co v United Kingdom Chamber of Shipping.pdf', 'Yes', 'Cleminson & Hill., G Cole Deacon', '1937', 'High Court', 'Great Western Railway Co v United Kingdom Chamber of Shipping The Great Western Ry Co applied to the Railway Rates Tribunal, under the Railways Act 1921, s 37(1), for leave to grant certain exceptional rates more than 40 per cent below standard, in order that its railway might compete with coastwise shipping.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-03', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5835, 'Greenwood v Atherton', '', '../links/cases/Greenwood v Atherton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Tylee & Co agents., Exton & Southworth., Norton Rose Greenwell & Co agents', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Greenwood v Atherton The plaintiff, an infant, was injured at school during an authorised recreation period by the swinging to of a pair of iron gates, which crushed his hand.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-06', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(5836, 'Greenwood v Atherton', '', '../links/cases/Greenwood v Atherton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Tylee & Co agents., Exton & Southworth., Norton Rose Greenwell & Co agents', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Greenwood v Atherton The plaintiff, an infant, was injured at school during an authorised recreation period by the swinging to of a pair of iron gates, which crushed his hand.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-06', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(5837, 'Greenwood v Greenwood', '', '../links/cases/Greenwood v Greenwood.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kimber Bull Howland Clappé & Co., F G Huggett', '1937', 'High Court', 'Greenwood v Greenwood The parties were married in 1901. There was a deed of separation between the parties in 1907, replaced by others in 1915, 1921, and 1933 respectively. By the final deed the wife agreed, in consideration of the payment of £1,000, to discharge the husband from all claims for maintenance.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-29', 'FAMILY'),
(5838, 'Greer v Kettle', '', '../links/cases/Greer v Kettle.pdf', 'Yes', 'Simmons & Simmons., Linklaters & Paines', '1937', 'High Court', 'Greer v Kettle By a deed of guarantee for the repayment of a loan of £250,000 and interest, which recited that the lenders had, at the request of the guarantors, advanced to the borrowers £250,000, upon security of a charge on certain shares, the guarantors covenanted, in the event of the borrowers failing to make the repayments provided for, forthwith to repay to the lenders the said sum of £250,000, with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-22', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5839, 'Greer v Kettle', '', '../links/cases/Greer v Kettle.pdf', 'Yes', 'Simmons & Simmons., Linklaters & Paines', '1937', 'High Court', 'Greer v Kettle By a deed of guarantee for the repayment of a loan of £250,000 and interest, which recited that the lenders had, at the request of the guarantors, advanced to the borrowers £250,000, upon security of a charge on certain shares, the guarantors covenanted, in the event of the borrowers failing to make the repayments provided for, forthwith to repay to the lenders the said sum of £250,000, with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-22', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5840, 'Groom v Crocker and Others', '', '../links/cases/Groom v Crocker and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar., Linklaters & Paines., Nash Field & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Groom v Crocker and Others The plaintiff took out with an insurance company a motor insurance policy containing a clause that the plaintiff would not incur any expense whether in respect of litigation or otherwise or make any payment, settlement, arrangement, or admission of liability for which the company might be liable under the policy without the written authority of the company and that the company should have absolute conduct and control of all or any proceedings against the plaintiff.', 'Malcolm Logan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-27', 'INSURANCE'),
(5841, 'Groom v Crocker and Others', '', '../links/cases/Groom v Crocker and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar., Linklaters & Paines., Nash Field & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Groom v Crocker and Others The plaintiff took out with an insurance company a motor insurance policy containing a clause that the plaintiff would not incur any expense whether in respect of litigation or otherwise or make any payment, settlement, arrangement, or admission of liability for which the company might be liable under the policy without the written authority of the company and that the company should have absolute conduct and control of all or any proceedings against the plaintiff.', 'Malcolm Logan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-27', 'INSURANCE'),
(5842, 'Gulbenkian v Gulbenkian', '', '../links/cases/Gulbenkian v Gulbenkian.pdf', 'Yes', 'Charles Russell & Co., Gordon Dadds & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Gulbenkian v Gulbenkian The respondent in a divorce suit was an Armenian by birth, a subject of the Ottoman Empire, but left Turkey for England at the age of 3 months.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-06', 'FAMILY'),
(5843, 'Hagen v National Provincial Bank Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Hagen v National Provincial Bank Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Arthur S Joseph & Co., Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Poole', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Hagen v National Provincial Bank Ltd The defendants in an action for slander applied to the master for a City of London special jury. The master refused the application, considering that he was bound by the decision in Barnes v Lawson, and the rule of practice founded thereon, to the effect that, in cases to be heard before a City of London jury, interlocutory applications are made to the judge in charge of the commercial list and not to a master.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5844, 'Hagen v National Provincial Bank Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Hagen v National Provincial Bank Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Arthur S Joseph & Co., Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Poole', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Hagen v National Provincial Bank Ltd The defendants in an action for slander applied to the master for a City of London special jury. The master refused the application, considering that he was bound by the decision in Barnes v Lawson, and the rule of practice founded thereon, to the effect that, in cases to be heard before a City of London jury, interlocutory applications are made to the judge in charge of the commercial list and not to a master.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5845, 'Halls v Halls and Lukover', '', '../links/cases/Halls v Halls and Lukover.pdf', 'Yes', 'Shaen Roscoe Massey & Co., Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Sharpe Pritt co', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Halls v Halls and Lukover Upon a petition for divorce by a husband, the wife obtained a limited poor person’s certificate, ie, a certificate admitting the wife to proceed as a poor person in such proceedings as were necessary to enable her to obtain an order for security for her costs.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-28', 'FAMILY'),
(5846, 'Hanlon and Others v Port of Liverpool Stevedoring Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Hanlon and Others v Port of Liverpool Stevedoring Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'G J Lynskey & Sons., Weightman Pedder & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Hanlon and Others v Port of Liverpool Stevedoring Co Ltd Five stevedores were loading a ship, and, following instructions given to them by the hatch foreman, a servant of the defendant company, placed 49 tons of iron upon a between-deck hatch covering. The hatch covering collapsed and the plaintiffs fell into the hold and were injured.', 'M D Chorlton Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-18', 'HEALTH'),
(5847, 'Hanlon and Others v Port of Liverpool Stevedoring Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Hanlon and Others v Port of Liverpool Stevedoring Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'G J Lynskey & Sons., Weightman Pedder & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Hanlon and Others v Port of Liverpool Stevedoring Co Ltd Five stevedores were loading a ship, and, following instructions given to them by the hatch foreman, a servant of the defendant company, placed 49 tons of iron upon a between-deck hatch covering. The hatch covering collapsed and the plaintiffs fell into the hold and were injured.', 'M D Chorlton Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-18', 'HEALTH'),
(5848, 'Harris v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Harris v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'H Flint & Co., Leonard & Pilditch', '1938', 'High Court', 'Harris v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers Ltd A workman was employed in cleaning out washmills, for which purpose he tied rough sack leggings round his legs to protect him from dampness, as the work entailed standing in water. The leggings had to be dried at the end of each shift, for which purpose he was allowed to use the out-draught from a turbine in an adjoining motor-room.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-15', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5849, 'Harrods Ltd v Geneen', '', '../links/cases/Harrods Ltd v Geneen.pdf', 'Yes', 'McKenna & Co., Arthur Hunt', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Harrods Ltd v Geneen The defendant commissioned the plaintiffs to find a tenant for some premises who would be willing to pay the rent in advance. A tenant was proposed, who, though otherwise suitable, was only willing to pay the rent in arrear.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-24', 'CONTRACT'),
(5850, 'Harrods Ltd v Tester', '', '../links/cases/Harrods Ltd v Tester.pdf', 'Yes', 'McKenna & Co., E C Randall', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Harrods Ltd v Tester A husband opened a banking account in his wife’s name, all payments into the account being made by the husband. The account was used for domestic and other purposes. The wife always asked her husband’s consent before she drew on the account and she had given the bank a mandate to allow her husband to draw on the account.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-12', 'TRUST '),
(5851, 'Hawker v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Hawker v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Corbin Greener & Cook., Raley & Sons., Sturt & Hardy., Rhodes Cockburn & Co', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Hawker v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd The applicant was one of four boys who were employed in hauling coal in a coal-mine. The process of hauling included four distinct operations, and from time to time one of these would be allotted to each boy by an overseer.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-30', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5852, 'Hawker v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Hawker v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Corbin Greener & Cook., Raley & Sons., Sturt & Hardy., Rhodes Cockburn & Co', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Hawker v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd The applicant was one of four boys who were employed in hauling coal in a coal-mine. The process of hauling included four distinct operations, and from time to time one of these would be allotted to each boy by an overseer.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-30', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5853, 'Heaps v Perrite Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Heaps v Perrite Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'William Hurd & Son., Helder Roberts Giles & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Heaps v Perrite Ltd The courts have from time to time made large awards in actions for damages for personal injuries. The amount awarded in the present case is altogether exceptional and the reasons given by the Lords Justices for refusing to interfere with the award are of particular interest.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-19', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5854, 'Herniman v Smith', '', '../links/cases/Herniman v Smith.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crofts & Ingram., Wyatt & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Herniman v Smith A timber-merchant from time to time supplied a builder with timber. On several occasions deliveries of timber were made accompanied by fraudulent documents, which induced the builder to pay to the timber-merchant money to which the latter was not entitled.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-22', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(5855, 'Herniman v Smith', '', '../links/cases/Herniman v Smith.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crofts & Ingram., Wyatt & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Herniman v Smith A timber-merchant from time to time supplied a builder with timber. On several occasions deliveries of timber were made accompanied by fraudulent documents, which induced the builder to pay to the timber-merchant money to which the latter was not entitled.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-22', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(5856, 'Hills v London Passenger Transport Board', '', '../links/cases/Hills v London Passenger Transport Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'R McDonald', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Hills v London Passenger Transport Board GREER LJ. It has for a long time been the practice in this court that, where a respondent desires to obtain security for the costs of an appeal, he must state in his affidavit facts which show the appellant’s inability to pay such costs.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-12', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5857, 'His Highness Maharaja Man Singh of Sewai Jaipur v Arjun Lal and Others', '', '../links/cases/His Highness Maharaja Man Singh of Sewai Jaipur v Arjun Lal and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hy S L Polak & Co., Douglas Grant & Dold', '1937', 'High Court', 'His Highness Maharaja Man Singh of Sewai Jaipur v Arjun Lal and Others In the United Provinces all public streets are vested in the municipality by statute. The Municipal Board sanctioned the erection of a portico resting upon pillars standing on the footpath. The plaintiff, who was, subject to the statutory rights of the municipality, the owner of the soil of the highway, claimed a mandatory injunction ordering its demolition and damages, basing his action upon a trespass to his property in the land', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-26', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5858, 'His Highness Maharaja Man Singh of Sewai Jaipur v Arjun Lal and Others', '', '../links/cases/His Highness Maharaja Man Singh of Sewai Jaipur v Arjun Lal and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hy S L Polak & Co., Douglas Grant & Dold', '1937', 'High Court', 'His Highness Maharaja Man Singh of Sewai Jaipur v Arjun Lal and Others In the United Provinces all public streets are vested in the municipality by statute. The Municipal Board sanctioned the erection of a portico resting upon pillars standing on the footpath. The plaintiff, who was, subject to the statutory rights of the municipality, the owner of the soil of the highway, claimed a mandatory injunction ordering its demolition and damages, basing his action upon a trespass to his property in the land', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-26', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5859, 'Hoare v Adam Smith (London) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Hoare v Adam Smith.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lieberman Leigh & Co., T Vincent Howells', '1938', 'High Court', 'Hoare v Adam Smith (London) Ltd A loan by registered moneylenders was secured by a bill of sale. It appeared both from the memorandum and from the evidence that the borrower had received a copy of the bill of sale. It was contended that the memorandum was insufficient, since it did not state the power of seizure and sale contained in the bill of sale.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-02', 'CONSUMER'),
(5860, 'Holden v Howard', '', '../links/cases/Holden v Howard.pdf', 'Yes', 'Simon Haynes Barlas & Ireland', '1937', 'High Court', 'Holden v Howard  The tenant of a controlled dwelling-house died in 1931. She had occupied two rooms and sublet the other three rooms of the house to the defendant. Upon her death the defendant took possession of the whole house, becoming a trespasser in respect of the two rooms.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-18', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(5861, 'Holdsworth Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Holdsworth Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crossman Block & Co,Eaton Smith & Downey,Goddard & Co,Wade Tetley Hill & Co,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Holdsworth Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd The plaintiff company, a firm of haulage contractors and its managing director, brought actions for libel against six newspapers. In five of the cases the words complained of alleged that the plaintiff company had refused to accept an interim wages award of a joint conciliation board for the road transport industry and that, in consequence of that, members of a trade union had refused to handle the firm’s goods at Hull and Liverpool Docks', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-29', 'TORTS'),
(5862, 'Holdsworth Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Holdsworth Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Crossman Block & Co,Eaton Smith & Downey,Goddard & Co,Wade Tetley Hill & Co,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Holdsworth Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd The plaintiff company, a firm of haulage contractors and its managing director, brought actions for libel against six newspapers. In five of the cases the words complained of alleged that the plaintiff company had refused to accept an interim wages award of a joint conciliation board for the road transport industry and that, in consequence of that, members of a trade union had refused to handle the firm’s goods at Hull and Liverpool Docks', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-29', 'TORTS'),
(5863, 'Holgate and Another v Lancashire Mental Hospitals Board, Gill and Robertson', '', '../links/cases/Holgate and Another v Lancashire Mental Hospitals Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barker & Midgley., Sir George Etherton.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'Holgate and Another v Lancashire Mental Hospitals Board, Gill and Robertson  L, a defective, had been convicted many times for various forms of assault, some of a serious character, and was finally sentenced to be detained during His Majesty’s pleasure.', 'M D Chorlton Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-10', 'ADMINISTRATIVE'),
(5864, 'Holland v German Property Administrator', '', '../links/cases/Holland v German Property Administrator.pdf', 'Yes', 'Johnson Jecks & Colclough', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Holland v German Property Administrator Subject to a life interest for B, trustees held part of a trust fund in trust for D for life with remainder to her children. D, an Englishwoman married to an Englishman, at all material times lived with her family in Germany. B died in 1917 and thereafter there was no communication between D and her relatives in England, some of whom were the trustees, until 1927, when the trustees were informed that D and her family had adopted German nationality during the War.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-26', 'TRUST '),
(5865, 'Holland v German Property Administrator', '', '../links/cases/Holland v German Property Administrator.pdf', 'Yes', 'Johnson Jecks & Colclough', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Holland v German Property Administrator Subject to a life interest for B, trustees held part of a trust fund in trust for D for life with remainder to her children. D, an Englishwoman married to an Englishman, at all material times lived with her family in Germany. B died in 1917 and thereafter there was no communication between D and her relatives in England, some of whom were the trustees, until 1927, when the trustees were informed that D and her family had adopted German nationality during the War.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-26', 'TRUST '),
(5866, 'Howard v Charles P Kinnell & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Howard v Charles P Kinnell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Scott Duckers & Co., A E Wyeth & Co', '1931', 'High Court', 'Howard v Charles P Kinnell & Co Ltd The applicant had been injured in an accident on 18 February 1936, and thereafter received compensation on the footing of total incapacity at the rate of 30s per week until 26 April 1938, when the employers, having formed the opinion that the man was then only partially incapacitated, reduced the compensation to 21s 6d per week.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'FAMILY'),
(5867, 'Howard v Charles P Kinnell & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Howard v Charles P Kinnell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Scott Duckers & Co., A E Wyeth & Co', '1931', 'High Court', 'Howard v Charles P Kinnell & Co Ltd The applicant had been injured in an accident on 18 February 1936, and thereafter received compensation on the footing of total incapacity at the rate of 30s per week until 26 April 1938, when the employers, having formed the opinion that the man was then only partially incapacitated, reduced the compensation to 21s 6d per week.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'FAMILY'),
(5868, 'Hubbard v Messenger', '', '../links/cases/Hubbard v Messenger.pdf', 'Yes', 'Corbin Greener & Cook., Thompson Smith & Puxcon., White & King', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Hubbard v Messenger The respondent was charged with having unlawfully driven a Ford utility car, fitted with pneumatic tyres and constructed or adapted for the conveyance of goods or burden, on a public highway at a speed greater than 30 miles per hour (being the speed specified in the Road Traffic Act 1934, Sched I, as the maximum speed for such a vehicle), contrary to s 2 of that Act.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-13', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(5869, 'Hubbard v Messenger', '', '../links/cases/Hubbard v Messenger.pdf', 'Yes', 'Corbin Greener & Cook., Thompson Smith & Puxcon., White & King', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Hubbard v Messenger The respondent was charged with having unlawfully driven a Ford utility car, fitted with pneumatic tyres and constructed or adapted for the conveyance of goods or burden, on a public highway at a speed greater than 30 miles per hour (being the speed specified in the Road Traffic Act 1934, Sched I, as the maximum speed for such a vehicle), contrary to s 2 of that Act.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-13', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(5870, 'Hugh’s Settlement Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Hugh.pdf', 'Yes', 'Monier-Williams & Milroy', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Hugh’s Settlement Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners A society duly registered under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1893, claimed exemption from Sched A income tax in respect of land held by them, on the ground that such land was vested in them for charitable purposes only.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-10', 'TAXATION'),
(5871, 'Hunt v Rice & Son Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Hunt v Rice&sons ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Musson & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Hunt v Rice & Son Ltd A builder’s labourer was engaged in digging a trench 6 ft deep in connection with the erection of a block of flats. The sides of the trench were not secured by boards. Owing to the unsuspected existence of an old drain near one side of the trench, that side fell in, and the labourer was fatally injured.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-14', 'civi'),
(5872, 'Indian Radio and Cable Communications Co Ltd v Income Tax Commissioner', '', '../links/cases/Indian Radio and Cable Communications Co Ltd v Income Tax Commissioner.pdf', 'Yes', 'E F Turner & Sons', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Indian Radio and Cable Communications Co Ltd v Income Tax Commissioner The appellant company carried on in India the business of communication by wireless and another company carried on the business and undertaking in India of communication by cable. By an agreement entered into in February 1932, by the two companies, the future operation and control of both businesses were to be conducted until December 1944, by the appellant company.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-08', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5873, 'Inland Revenue Commissioners v Gull', '', '../links/cases/Inland Revenue Commissioners v Gull.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kerly Sons & Karuth', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Inland Revenue Commissioners v Gull A testator gave the balance of his property in England and Russia to establish a charitable home in Ontario. The testator was domiciled in Ontario, and the will was proved in 1925 by one executor in England and by another in Ontario.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'CHARITIES'),
(5874, 'Inland Revenue Commissioners v Kered Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Inland Revenue Commissioners v Kered Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Biddle Thorne Welsford & Gait., Gilbert Samuel & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Inland Revenue Commissioners v Kered Ltd An investment company had issued debentures, and the holder of the debentures was a loan creditor within the meaning of the Finance Act 1936, s 20. For the year ending 30 November 1935, the gross income of the company was £8,020 6s 5d.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-08', 'COURT OF APPEAL'),
(5875, 'Inland Revenue Commissioners v The Personal Representative of Sir Harry Mallaby-Deeley, Bart.', '', '../links/cases/Inland Revenue Commissioners v The Personal Representative of Sir Harry Mallaby.pdf', 'Yes', 'F R Allen., Sir Harry Mallaby-Deeley', '1938', 'High Court', 'Inland Revenue Commissioners v The Personal Representative of Sir Harry Mallaby-Deeley, Bart. On 29 November 1926, D wrote to the directors of a company publishing a work called The Complete Peerage that, with reference to his offer to provide £33,000 to enable them to complete the work, he had already provided £5,000 by means of a guarantee, and he thereby recorded his undertaking to provide the remaining £28,000 by quarterly instalments of £1,400.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-09', 'TAXATION'),
(5876, 'Izzard v Universal Insurance Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Izzard v Universal Insurance Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'L Bingham & Co., A D Vandamm & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Izzard v Universal Insurance Co Ltd The assured owned a motor vehicle, which was insured, under a policy of insurance, against commercial risks, but not against passenger risks.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister.,', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-01', 'INSURANCE'),
(5877, 'J F Adair & Co Ltd v Birnbaum', '', '../links/cases/J F Adair.pdf', 'Yes', 'Rehder & Higgs., Simmons & Simmons', '1938', 'High Court', 'J F Adair & Co Ltd v Birnbaum The buyer purchased from the sellers a large quantity of pepper, the contract being in the form used by the General Produce Brokers’ Association.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-05', 'SALE OF GOODS'),
(5878, 'J & E Hall Ltd v Barclay', '', '../links/cases/J&E Hall ltd vrs barclay.pdf', 'Yes', 'Arthur S Joseph & Co., Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Poole', '1937', 'Appeal', 'J & E Hall Ltd v Barclay The respondent company did work for the appellant in erecting and testing a pair of experimental davits. The davits and testing apparatus were then dismantled and kept by the respondent company for several years. A dispute arose over the non-payment of part of the appellant’s account for work done, and a writ was issued.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-08', 'CONTRACT'),
(5879, 'Jackson v Hayes Candy & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Jackson v Hayes Candy.pdf', 'Yes', 'W A Robinson., Leonard Tubbs & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Jackson v Hayes Candy & Co Ltd A contract of service was made by letter stating that as from 20 December 1931, the plaintiff’s salary was to be £340 per annum. Subject to certain conditions, the plaintiff was to receive a commission of ¼ per cent of the turnover in excess of £40,000.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-22', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5880, 'Jackson v Hayes Candy & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Jackson v Hayes Candy.pdf', 'Yes', 'W A Robinson., Leonard Tubbs & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Jackson v Hayes Candy & Co Ltd A contract of service was made by letter stating that as from 20 December 1931, the plaintiff’s salary was to be £340 per annum. Subject to certain conditions, the plaintiff was to receive a commission of ¼ per cent of the turnover in excess of £40,000.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-22', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5881, 'John v Mendoza', '', '../links/cases/John v Mendoza.pdf', 'Yes', 'Thorp Saunders & Thorp., Beckingsales & Naylors', '1938', 'High Court', 'John v Mendoza The defendant owed the plaintiff a sum of £852 15s 6d when, in May 1935, a bankruptcy notice was served on the former. On 4 September, the defendant was adjudicated bankrupt. Shortly before that date, the plaintiff, who was proposing to prove in the bankruptcy, was asked by the defendant to withdraw his claim.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-10-25', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(5882, 'Jones v Welsh Insurance Corporation Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Jones v Welsh Insurance Corporation Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Jaques & Co., Nee & Stanley Jones', '1937', 'High Court', 'Jones v Welsh Insurance Corporation Ltd The plaintiff obtained a judgment against T in respect of injuries caused by the negligent driving of T’s motor car. T having no means, the plaintiff sued T’s insurers, the defendant corporation, under the provisions of the Road Traffic Act 1934, s 10(1). T’s insurance policy covered the use of his car “for social, domestic and pleasure purposes,â€ and for use “in connection with his business or professionâ€ as stated in the schedule.', 'C St J W Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-22', 'INSURANCE'),
(5883, 'Josselson v Borst', '', '../links/cases/Josselson v Borst.pdf', 'Yes', 'E Fuller Briscoe Barrister', '1937', 'High Court', 'Josselson v Borst In 1923 a lease was granted to the defendant and his brother, B B, who were in partnership. In 1927 the partnership was dissolved, and the lease, as part of the terms of the dissolution, was allotted to B B, who formed a limited company, B B Ltd, to which the lease was duly assigned.', 'Bishop & Fenton-Jones., W R J Hickman & ', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-15', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(5884, 'Jupiter General Insurance Co Ltd v Ardeshir Bomanji Shroff', '', '../links/cases/Jupiter General Insurance Co Ltd v Ardeshir Bomanji Shroff.pdf', 'Yes', 'E F Turner & Sons., T L Wilson & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Jupiter General Insurance Co Ltd v Ardeshir Bomanji Shroff The manager of the life insurance department of an insurance company recommended the issue of an endowment policy upon a life which the managing governor had a few days earlier refused to re-insure. He was thereupon dismissed, being given his current month’s salary and a month’s salary in lieu of notice', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-15', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5885, 'Jupiter General Insurance Co Ltd v Ardeshir Bomanji Shroff', '', '../links/cases/Jupiter General Insurance Co Ltd v Ardeshir Bomanji Shroff.pdf', 'Yes', 'E F Turner & Sons., T L Wilson & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Jupiter General Insurance Co Ltd v Ardeshir Bomanji Shroff The manager of the life insurance department of an insurance company recommended the issue of an endowment policy upon a life which the managing governor had a few days earlier refused to re-insure. He was thereupon dismissed, being given his current month’s salary and a month’s salary in lieu of notice', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-15', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5886, 'Kahn v Aircraft Industries Corporation Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Kahn v Aircraft Industries Corporation Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Clifford-Turner & Co., Kenneth Brown Baker Baker', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Kahn v Aircraft Industries Corporation Ltd An agent procured an agreement for the sale of shares for the sum of £200,000, upon which he was entitled to £16,000 commission. The condition of his agreement with the defendant company was: “in the event of our making the purchase.â€', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-12', 'CONTRACT'),
(5887, 'Kahn v Aircraft Industries Corporation Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Kahn v Aircraft Industries Corporation Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Clifford-Turner & Co., Kenneth Brown Baker Baker', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Kahn v Aircraft Industries Corporation Ltd An agent procured an agreement for the sale of shares for the sum of £200,000, upon which he was entitled to £16,000 commission. The condition of his agreement with the defendant company was: “in the event of our making the purchase.â€', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-12', 'CONTRACT'),
(5888, 'Kasofsky v Kreegers (Phillips, Claimant)', '', '../links/cases/Kasofsky v Kreegers.pdf', 'Yes', 'Harold Miller., Bernard Simmonds & Co., Patersons Snow & CoGepp & Sons.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Kasofsky v Kreegers (Phillips, Claimant) An execution creditor having seized certain goods of the debtor, the goods were claimed by a receiver appointed under a power given by a debenture deed. The appointment was dated the day after the execution of the deed. It was contended that such appointment was prima facie valid, and that it was for the creditor to show that none of the events specified in the deed as giving rise to the power had happened', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-15', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5889, 'Kasofsky v Kreegers (Phillips, Claimant)', '', '../links/cases/Kasofsky v Kreegers.pdf', 'Yes', 'Harold Miller., Bernard Simmonds & Co., Patersons Snow & CoGepp & Sons.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Kasofsky v Kreegers (Phillips, Claimant) An execution creditor having seized certain goods of the debtor, the goods were claimed by a receiver appointed under a power given by a debenture deed. The appointment was dated the day after the execution of the deed. It was contended that such appointment was prima facie valid, and that it was for the creditor to show that none of the events specified in the deed as giving rise to the power had happened', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-15', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5890, 'Kearry v Pattinson', '', '../links/cases/Kearry v Pattinson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hamlins Grammer & Hamlin., Smith & Hudson., Richard Witty & Co Hull', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Kearry v Pattinson Some of the plaintiff’s bees swarmed and settled on the defendant’s land. The defendant refused to allow the plaintiff to enter upon his land and retake the bees, which were thereby lost.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-20', 'ANIMALS '),
(5891, 'Kevorkian v Burney', '', '../links/cases/Kevorkian v Burney.pdf', 'Yes', 'Cardew Smith & Ross., Jacobson Ridley & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Kevorkian v Burney The plaintiff, who resided abroad, had purchased from the defendant for over £3,000 what was warranted to be an authentic Greek statue of the sixth century BC. In an action for breach of warranty, wherein it was alleged that the statue was spurious, application was made that the plaintiff should give security for costs.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(5892, 'Knight v Howard Wall Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Knight v Howard Wall Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'William Hurd & Son., Raymonds', '1938', 'High Court', 'Knight v Howard Wall Ltd The applicant was injured by a dart while he was eating his midday meal in a canteen. The canteen was a part of the employers’ premises, and was provided for the convenience of the workpeople by arrangement with an independent contractor.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-06', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5893, 'Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne', '', '../links/cases/Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Bremner Sons & Corlett., Turner & Co', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne An estate company borrowed a sum of £310,000 from an insurance company, and as security mortgaged to the lenders property consisting of 75 houses, 8 shops and a block of flats. It was a term of the mortgage that the principal should be repaid by 80 half-yearly instalments spread over a period of 40 years.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-01', 'LAND '),
(5894, 'Kornatzki v Oppenheimer', '', '../links/cases/Kornatzki v Oppenheimer.pdf', 'Yes', 'Slaughter & May., Cruesemann & Rouse', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Kornatzki v Oppenheimer  Under their father’s will, the female plaintiff was given an annuity and certain other rights and the defendant was the residuary legatee. The rights of the parties were subsequently, in 1905, the subject of a compromise approved by the German court, under which, so far as is material to this case, the female plaintiff was to receive an annuity of 8,000 marks.', 'J MacGillivray Asher Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-14', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5895, 'Kubach and Another v Hollands and Another', '', '../links/cases/Kubach and Another v Hollands and Another.pdf', 'Yes', 'W G R Saunders & Son., Hamilton Hill & Evershed., Easton & Sons', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Kubach and Another v Hollands and Another A schoolgirl was carrying out a chemical experiment with chemicals supplied by the teacher of the chemistry class, when an explosion occurred whereby she was severely injured. The experiment was one for the making of oxygen by heating a mixture of potassium chlorate and manganese dioxide, a perfectly harmless experiment.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-29', 'TORTS'),
(5896, 'Lake View & Star Ltd v Cominelli', '', '../links/cases/Lake View.pdf', 'Yes', 'Birkbeck Julius Edwards & Co., Gregory Rowcliffe & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Lake View & Star Ltd v Cominelli The appellants were the lessees of a gold mine in Western Australia. The respondents were tributers of the mine under tribute agreements made with the appellants on 15 May 1930, and approved and registered by the warden.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-26', 'INDUSTRY'),
(5897, 'Lambert and Another v F W Woolworth & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Lambert and Another v F W Woolwort1.pdf', 'Yes', 'Savery Stevens & Nutt., Dods & Bockett', '1937', 'High Court', 'Lambert and Another v F W Woolworth & Co Ltd It has been pointed out to the Editors that the concluding words of the judgment do not very clearly indicate the order actually made herein, and the material part of the order is here set out in full.', 'J MacGillivray Asher Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-07', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(5898, 'Laycock', '', '../links/cases/Laycock.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kingsford Dorman & Co., Clark & Adams', '1938', 'High Court', 'Laycock Up to 1 April 1935, the respondent company owned two subsidiary companies which carried on the business of the manufacture and the wholesale sale of boots and shoes, which the respondent company sold by retail in its shops.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-02', 'TAXATION'),
(5899, 'Lind v Johnson', '', '../links/cases/Lind v Johnson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ellis & Fairbairn., Blount Petre & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Lind v Johnson The plaintiff, a farm bailiff, was injured in a collision between his employer’s van, which he was driving, and a motor lorry owned by the defendant. The defendant admitted the negligence of his driver, but relied upon the Workmen’s Compensation Act 1925, s 30, alleging that the plaintiff had received compensation under that Act, and was debarred from recovering damages.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5900, 'Lind v Johnson', '', '../links/cases/Lind v Johnson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ellis & Fairbairn., Blount Petre & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Lind v Johnson The plaintiff, a farm bailiff, was injured in a collision between his employer’s van, which he was driving, and a motor lorry owned by the defendant. The defendant admitted the negligence of his driver, but relied upon the Workmen’s Compensation Act 1925, s 30, alleging that the plaintiff had received compensation under that Act, and was debarred from recovering damages.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5901, 'Lind v Johnson', '', '../links/cases/Lind v Johnson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ellis & Fairbairn., Blount Petre & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Lind v Johnson The plaintiff, a farm bailiff, was injured in a collision between his employer’s van, which he was driving, and a motor lorry owned by the defendant. The defendant admitted the negligence of his driver, but relied upon the Workmen’s Compensation Act 1925, s 30, alleging that the plaintiff had received compensation under that Act, and was debarred from recovering damages.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(5902, 'Littlejohn v London County Council', '', '../links/cases/Littlejohn v London County Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Edward Fail., J R Howard Roberts', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Littlejohn v London County Council The appellant had been a poor law relieving officer in the service of the Stepney Guardians, who, in 1927, had made a set of regulations governing, inter alia, payment of sick pay to their officers. By the Local Government Act 1930, he was automatically transferred to the service of the respondent council, and in 1932 entered into a new contract of service with it at a higher scale of pay.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(5903, 'Littlejohn v London County Council', '', '../links/cases/Littlejohn v London County Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Edward Fail., J R Howard Roberts', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Littlejohn v London County Council The appellant had been a poor law relieving officer in the service of the Stepney Guardians, who, in 1927, had made a set of regulations governing, inter alia, payment of sick pay to their officers. By the Local Government Act 1930, he was automatically transferred to the service of the respondent council, and in 1932 entered into a new contract of service with it at a higher scale of pay.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(5904, 'Llay Main Collieries Ltd v Jones', '', '../links/cases/Llay Main Collieries Ltd v Jones.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gregory Rowcliffe & Co., Peace & Ellis Wigan., Jaques & Co', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Llay Main Collieries Ltd v Jones The employers of a workman, who had been injured in 1934, being of the opinion that he had recovered from his injuries, applied for a medical reference under s 19(2) of the Act.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-06', 'EMPLOYMENT');
INSERT INTO `courtrulings` (`id`, `title`, `content`, `link`, `isshow`, `author`, `date`, `courttype`, `summary`, `presiding`, `casetype`, `subjectmatter`, `caseno`, `counsel1`, `counsel2`, `courtname`, `caseDate`, `subjectmattertitle`) VALUES
(5905, 'Lloyd v Francis', '', '../links/cases/Lloyd v Francis.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wrentmore & Son., Thomas W Lewis., Merthyr Tydfil', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Lloyd v Francis capital – Winding up of society – Position of liquidator where rule ignored.\r\nUpon the final winding up of an industrial society in 1936, a dividend of just over 2s in the £ was paid, and the book debts owing to the society were assigned to the plaintiff.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-16', 'COMPANY'),
(5906, 'Lloyd v Francis', '', '../links/cases/Lloyd v Francis.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wrentmore & Son., Thomas W Lewis., Merthyr Tydfil', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Lloyd v Francis capital – Winding up of society – Position of liquidator where rule ignored.\r\nUpon the final winding up of an industrial society in 1936, a dividend of just over 2s in the £ was paid, and the book debts owing to the society were assigned to the plaintiff.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-16', 'COMPANY'),
(5907, 'Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association', '', '../links/cases/Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association.pdf', 'Yes', 'Allen & Overy., Linklaters & Paines', '1937', 'High Court', 'Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association A company pledged certain bills of lading with the plaintiff bank as security for bills of exchange or advances. The plaintiff bank then handed the bills of lading back to the company at its request, so that they or the goods represented by them might be sold and the proceeds held in trust for the plaintiff bank, as stipulated in trust receipts which were given to the plaintiff bank.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-08', 'CONTRACT'),
(5908, 'Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association', '', '../links/cases/Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association.pdf', 'Yes', 'Allen & Overy., Linklaters & Paines', '1937', 'High Court', 'Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association A company pledged certain bills of lading with the plaintiff bank as security for bills of exchange or advances. The plaintiff bank then handed the bills of lading back to the company at its request, so that they or the goods represented by them might be sold and the proceeds held in trust for the plaintiff bank, as stipulated in trust receipts which were given to the plaintiff bank.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-08', 'CONTRACT'),
(5909, 'London & Northern Estates Co Ltd v Harris', '', '../links/cases/London vrs nothern estate co.ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Herbert Reeves & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'London & Northern Estates Co Ltd v Harris A company, whose business consisted mainly in the making of investments and therefore entitled to relief under the Income Tax Act 1918, s 33, such investments being mainly in real property, claimed relief under s 33 in respect of its expenses of management.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-04', 'TAXATION'),
(5910, 'London & Northern Estates Co Ltd v Harris', '', '../links/cases/London vrs nothern estate co.ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Herbert Reeves & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'London & Northern Estates Co Ltd v Harris A company, whose business consisted mainly in the making of investments and therefore entitled to relief under the Income Tax Act 1918, s 33, such investments being mainly in real property, claimed relief under s 33 in respect of its expenses of management.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-04', 'TAXATION'),
(5911, 'Lowry v Consolidated African Selection Trust Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Lowry v Consolidated African Selection Trust Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Freshfields Leese & Munns', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Lowry v Consolidated African Selection Trust Ltd A company issued 6,000 ordinary shares to its employees at par, the par value being 5s. The market value at the time was £2 3s 9d. The employees were assessed to tax in respect of the difference between the market value and the par value.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-10', 'TAXATION'),
(5912, 'Lowry v Consolidated African Selection Trust Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Lowry v Consolidated African Selection Trust Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Freshfields Leese & Munns', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Lowry v Consolidated African Selection Trust Ltd A company issued 6,000 ordinary shares to its employees at par, the par value being 5s. The market value at the time was £2 3s 9d. The employees were assessed to tax in respect of the difference between the market value and the par value.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-10', 'TAXATION'),
(5913, 'M D Chorlton Esq Barrister', '', '../links/cases/M D Chorlton Esq.pdf', 'Yes', 'L Bingham & Co., T A Matthews', '1937', 'High Court', 'M D Chorlton Esq Barrister The plaintiff in a running-down action was insured against third party risks only. The defendant successfully counterclaimed for damage to his motor vehicle. The insurance company applied to the registrar to apportion the costs as between itself and the plaintiff.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-07', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5914, 'Macleay v Treadwell', '', '../links/cases/Macleay v Treadwell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Coward Chance & Co., Wray Smith & Halford', '1937', 'High Court', 'Macleay v Treadwell The testator, a Scot by origin, at the time of his death in 1895 was resident in and domiciled in New Zealand.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-12', 'SUCCESSION'),
(5915, 'Macleay v Treadwell', '', '../links/cases/Macleay v Treadwell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Coward Chance & Co., Wray Smith & Halford', '1937', 'High Court', 'Macleay v Treadwell The testator, a Scot by origin, at the time of his death in 1895 was resident in and domiciled in New Zealand.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-12', 'SUCCESSION'),
(5916, 'Mansell v Star Printing & Publishing Co of Toronto Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Mansell v Star Printing.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sole Sawbridge & Co., Charles Russell & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Mansell v Star Printing & Publishing Co of Toronto Ltd The appellant, a publisher of fine art colour-prints, resident in England, was the owner of 31 pictures painted before 1 January 1924, prints of which were manufactured by him and sold for various purposes. The pictures were not “produced or reproduced in Canadaâ€ prior to 1 January 1924, nor had the appellant ever recorded the copyright thereof under the Canadian Copyright Act of 1906 (RSC, c 70).', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5917, 'Mansell v Star Printing & Publishing Co of Toronto Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Mansell v Star Printing.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sole Sawbridge & Co., Charles Russell & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Mansell v Star Printing & Publishing Co of Toronto Ltd The appellant, a publisher of fine art colour-prints, resident in England, was the owner of 31 pictures painted before 1 January 1924, prints of which were manufactured by him and sold for various purposes. The pictures were not “produced or reproduced in Canadaâ€ prior to 1 January 1924, nor had the appellant ever recorded the copyright thereof under the Canadian Copyright Act of 1906 (RSC, c 70).', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(5918, 'Marthews v Marthews', '', '../links/cases/Marthews v Marthews.pdf', 'Yes', 'J D Langton & Passmore', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Marthews v Marthews The petitioner sought a divorce upon the ground that his wife had deserted him for a period of at least 3 years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. It was found that the wife had deserted the petitioner in October 1934. The petitioner had in February 1937, presented a petition for judicial separation.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-08', 'FAMILY'),
(5919, 'Marthews v Marthews', '', '../links/cases/Marthews v Marthews.pdf', 'Yes', 'J D Langton & Passmore', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Marthews v Marthews The petitioner sought a divorce upon the ground that his wife had deserted him for a period of at least 3 years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. It was found that the wife had deserted the petitioner in October 1934. The petitioner had in February 1937, presented a petition for judicial separation.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-08', 'FAMILY'),
(5920, 'Mayer & Sherratt v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Mayer vrs Co-operative Insurance society ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Duffell & Son Birmingham., Freeland & Passey', '1938', 'High Court', 'Mayer & Sherratt v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd The workman, an employee of the claimants, had, though the fact was not established until after his death, contracted lead-poisoning in their employ, had become totally incapacitated in November 1936, and had died from that disease in March 1937.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-21', 'HEALTH'),
(5921, 'Mayer & Sherratt v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Mayer vrs Co-operative Insurance society ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Duffell & Son Birmingham., Freeland & Passey', '1938', 'High Court', 'Mayer & Sherratt v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd The workman, an employee of the claimants, had, though the fact was not established until after his death, contracted lead-poisoning in their employ, had become totally incapacitated in November 1936, and had died from that disease in March 1937.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-21', 'HEALTH'),
(5922, 'McCalmont v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/McCalmont v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wm Easton & Sons', '1937', 'Supreme', 'McCalmont v Inland Revenue Commissioners The appellant was resident in both the United Kingdom and the Irish Free State. For the year 1923–24 he paid United Kingdom and Irish Free State income tax, and a claim for relief under the Finance Act 1920, s 27, in respect of such double income tax was admitted.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-04', 'TAXATION'),
(5923, 'McCalmont v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/McCalmont v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wm Easton & Sons', '1937', 'Supreme', 'McCalmont v Inland Revenue Commissioners The appellant was resident in both the United Kingdom and the Irish Free State. For the year 1923–24 he paid United Kingdom and Irish Free State income tax, and a claim for relief under the Finance Act 1920, s 27, in respect of such double income tax was admitted.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-04', 'TAXATION'),
(5924, 'McCarthy v Penrikyber Navigation Colliery Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/McCarthy v Penrikyber Navigation Colliery Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Furniss Stephen & Co., Smith Rundell Dods & Bockett., Bruce Furniss Stephen & Co& Nicholas.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'McCarthy v Penrikyber Navigation Colliery Co Ltd Lord St Aldwyn’s Award, made under the Coal Mines (Minimum Wage) Act 1912, provides that the following questions shall be referred to the trade tribunal: (a) as to whether a workman is one to whom the minimum rate applies; (b) whether the workman has complied with the rules of the award; and (c) whether such non-compliance has worked a forfeiture of his right to the minimum rate.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-23', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(5925, 'McCarthy v Penrikyber Navigation Colliery Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/McCarthy v Penrikyber Navigation Colliery Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Furniss Stephen & Co., Smith Rundell Dods & Bockett., Bruce Furniss Stephen & Co& Nicholas.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'McCarthy v Penrikyber Navigation Colliery Co Ltd Lord St Aldwyn’s Award, made under the Coal Mines (Minimum Wage) Act 1912, provides that the following questions shall be referred to the trade tribunal: (a) as to whether a workman is one to whom the minimum rate applies; (b) whether the workman has complied with the rules of the award; and (c) whether such non-compliance has worked a forfeiture of his right to the minimum rate.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-23', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(5926, 'McLaughlin v Solloway', '', '../links/cases/McLaughlin v Solloway.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gard Lyell & Co., Lawrence Jones & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'McLaughlin v Solloway The respondent, in October 1929, instructed the firm of Solloway Mills & Co Ltd (Ontario incorporation), of which the appellants were directors, to purchase on margin 7,000 shares in a mining company. At the same time, he deposited 3,500 shares of the same stock as collateral security, and duly received a contract note purporting to show that the transaction had been carried out.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5927, 'McLaughlin v Solloway', '', '../links/cases/McLaughlin v Solloway.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gard Lyell & Co., Lawrence Jones & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'McLaughlin v Solloway The respondent, in October 1929, instructed the firm of Solloway Mills & Co Ltd (Ontario incorporation), of which the appellants were directors, to purchase on margin 7,000 shares in a mining company. At the same time, he deposited 3,500 shares of the same stock as collateral security, and duly received a contract note purporting to show that the transaction had been carried out.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5928, 'McManus v Bowes and Others', '', '../links/cases/McManus v Bowes and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Beamish Hanson Airy & Co., Shenton Pain & Brown.,Robbins Olivey & Lake', '1937', 'Appeal', 'McManus v Bowes and Others A county mental hospital was maintained by a joint visiting committee under the Lunacy Act 1890. This committee engaged the plaintiff as assistant medical officer, but no terms as to the termination of the appointment were settled.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-07', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(5929, 'McManus v Bowes and Others', '', '../links/cases/McManus v Bowes and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Beamish Hanson Airy & Co., Shenton Pain & Brown.,Robbins Olivey & Lake', '1937', 'Appeal', 'McManus v Bowes and Others A county mental hospital was maintained by a joint visiting committee under the Lunacy Act 1890. This committee engaged the plaintiff as assistant medical officer, but no terms as to the termination of the appointment were settled.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-07', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(5930, 'Medcalf and Another v R Strawbridge Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Medcalf and Another v R Strawbridge Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Billinghurst Wood & Pope., H H Kemp', '1937', 'High Court', 'Medcalf and Another v R Strawbridge Ltd The owner of a vehicle attached to his vehicle a skid-pan which did damage to the surface of an unadopted road. In an action by two of the frontagers to restrain the continued use of the skid-pan, the owner of the vehicle contended that, if what was being done amounted to a nuisance, it was a public nuisance and, the damages being common to all the subjects of the Crown, the Attorney-General alone could sue.', 'Gerald Abrahams Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-23', 'TRANSPORT'),
(5931, 'Medcalf and Another v R Strawbridge Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Medcalf and Another v R Strawbridge Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Billinghurst Wood & Pope., H H Kemp', '1937', 'High Court', 'Medcalf and Another v R Strawbridge Ltd The owner of a vehicle attached to his vehicle a skid-pan which did damage to the surface of an unadopted road. In an action by two of the frontagers to restrain the continued use of the skid-pan, the owner of the vehicle contended that, if what was being done amounted to a nuisance, it was a public nuisance and, the damages being common to all the subjects of the Crown, the Attorney-General alone could sue.', 'Gerald Abrahams Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-23', 'TRANSPORT'),
(5932, 'Mercantile Bank of India Ltd v Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China, and Strauss & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Mercantile Bank of India Ltd v Chartered Bank of India.pdf', 'Yes', 'E F Turner & Sons., Linklaters & Paines., Slaughter & May', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Mercantile Bank of India Ltd v Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China, and Strauss & Co Ltd The defendant bank advanced money to the defendant company, sometimes by way of overdraft and at other times by way of advance on loan account. These advances were secured by trust receipts, by which the company agreed that goods purchased with such advances should be held by them as agents for and in trust for the bank, the intention being that the bank should be entitled to such goods as security for the advance.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-15', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5933, 'Mercantile Bank of India Ltd v Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China, and Strauss & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Mercantile Bank of India Ltd v Chartered Bank of India.pdf', 'Yes', 'E F Turner & Sons., Linklaters & Paines., Slaughter & May', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Mercantile Bank of India Ltd v Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China, and Strauss & Co Ltd The defendant bank advanced money to the defendant company, sometimes by way of overdraft and at other times by way of advance on loan account. These advances were secured by trust receipts, by which the company agreed that goods purchased with such advances should be held by them as agents for and in trust for the bank, the intention being that the bank should be entitled to such goods as security for the advance.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-15', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5934, 'Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Ball', '', '../links/cases/Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Ball.pdf', 'Yes', 'Miller & Smiths., Thomas Bagley Stone., G H Drury', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Ball The infant respondent carried on business as a haulage contractor. He entered into a hire-purchase agreement with the appellant company for the purchase of a motor lorry, but was unable to keep up the instalments. In an action brought to recover the arrears, the respondent pleaded infancy.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'CONSUMER'),
(5935, 'Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Ball', '', '../links/cases/Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Ball.pdf', 'Yes', 'Miller & Smiths., Thomas Bagley Stone., G H Drury', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Ball The infant respondent carried on business as a haulage contractor. He entered into a hire-purchase agreement with the appellant company for the purchase of a motor lorry, but was unable to keep up the instalments. In an action brought to recover the arrears, the respondent pleaded infancy.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'CONSUMER'),
(5936, 'Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Wheatley', '', '../links/cases/Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Wheatley.pdf', 'Yes', 'G H Drury., Alexander Fine Hawkins & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Wheatley A hire-purchase agreement between the parties to this action in respect of a motor lorry was dated 7 February 1936. The plaintiffs thereby let the lorry to the defendant upon the terms usually inserted in hire-purchase agreements.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-23', 'CONSUMER'),
(5937, 'Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Wheatley', '', '../links/cases/Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Wheatley.pdf', 'Yes', 'G H Drury., Alexander Fine Hawkins & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Mercantile Union Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Wheatley A hire-purchase agreement between the parties to this action in respect of a motor lorry was dated 7 February 1936. The plaintiffs thereby let the lorry to the defendant upon the terms usually inserted in hire-purchase agreements.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-23', 'CONSUMER'),
(5938, 'Messers Ltd v Morrison’s Export Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Messers Ltd v Morrison.pdf', 'Yes', 'William A Crump & Son., Pritchard Englefield & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Messers Ltd v Morrison’s Export Co Ltd A contract for the sale of timber contained the words “to be loaded on deck one-third at British Columbiaâ€ and “shipment January and February one-third on deck.â€ More than one-third was in fact shipped on deck, and the buyers thereupon rejected the goods as not answering to the description of the goods in the contract:', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-14', 'CONTRACT'),
(5939, 'Messers Ltd v Morrison’s Export Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Messers Ltd v Morrison.pdf', 'Yes', 'William A Crump & Son., Pritchard Englefield & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Messers Ltd v Morrison’s Export Co Ltd A contract for the sale of timber contained the words “to be loaded on deck one-third at British Columbiaâ€ and “shipment January and February one-third on deck.â€ More than one-third was in fact shipped on deck, and the buyers thereupon rejected the goods as not answering to the description of the goods in the contract:', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-14', 'CONTRACT'),
(5940, 'Metropolitan Electric Supply Co Ltd v Buckingham County Valuation Committee', '', '../links/cases/Metropolitan Electric Supply Co Ltd v Buckingham County Valuation Committee.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Bremner Sons & Corlett., Turner & Co', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Metropolitan Electric Supply Co Ltd v Buckingham County Valuation Committee An electric supply company transmitted electricity by means of a ring main passing through several rating areas. In one such area this main was not tapped for supply to any subsidiary distributor, but in a second area it was so tapped.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-21', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(5941, 'Metropolitan Electric Supply Co Ltd v Buckingham County Valuation Committee', '', '../links/cases/Metropolitan Electric Supply Co Ltd v Buckingham County Valuation Committee.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Bremner Sons & Corlett., Turner & Co', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Metropolitan Electric Supply Co Ltd v Buckingham County Valuation Committee An electric supply company transmitted electricity by means of a ring main passing through several rating areas. In one such area this main was not tapped for supply to any subsidiary distributor, but in a second area it was so tapped.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-21', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(5942, 'Midland Bank Executor & Trustee Co Ltd v Yarners Coffee Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Midland Bank Executor.pdf', 'Yes', 'C R Sawyer & Withall., Sutton Ommanney & Oliver', '1937', 'High Court', 'Midland Bank Executor & Trustee Co Ltd v Yarners Coffee Ltd By his will a testator declared “I forgive and release to any person indebted to me all sums owing to me by them except such sums as shall be secured to me by mortgages or legal charges.â€ In answer to a circular sent to the shareholders of a company in which the testator was a shareholder, he had lent to the company £300 which had not been repaid at the time of his death:—', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-10', 'SUCCESSION'),
(5943, 'Midland Bank Executor & Trustee Co Ltd v Yarners Coffee Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Midland Bank Executor.pdf', 'Yes', 'C R Sawyer & Withall., Sutton Ommanney & Oliver', '1937', 'High Court', 'Midland Bank Executor & Trustee Co Ltd v Yarners Coffee Ltd By his will a testator declared “I forgive and release to any person indebted to me all sums owing to me by them except such sums as shall be secured to me by mortgages or legal charges.â€ In answer to a circular sent to the shareholders of a company in which the testator was a shareholder, he had lent to the company £300 which had not been repaid at the time of his death:—', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-10', 'SUCCESSION'),
(5944, 'Milk Marketing Board v C Warman and Sons', '', '../links/cases/Milk Marketing Board v C Warman and Sons.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ellis & Fairbairn., Blount Petre & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Milk Marketing Board v C Warman and Sons The Milk Marketing Board was established under the Agricultural Marketing Act 1931, s 6, and regulated by a scheme which was one of the Statutory Rules and Orders. The Board also issued an explanatory leaflet which contained (inter alia) the following:', 'J MacGillivray Asher Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-28', 'AGRICULTURE'),
(5945, 'Milk Marketing Board v C Warman and Sons', '', '../links/cases/Milk Marketing Board v C Warman and Sons.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ellis & Fairbairn., Blount Petre & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Milk Marketing Board v C Warman and Sons The Milk Marketing Board was established under the Agricultural Marketing Act 1931, s 6, and regulated by a scheme which was one of the Statutory Rules and Orders. The Board also issued an explanatory leaflet which contained (inter alia) the following:', 'J MacGillivray Asher Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-28', 'AGRICULTURE'),
(5946, 'Miller v Cecil Film Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Miller v Cecil Film Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Andrew Purves Sutton & Creery., Lawrence Dennis & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Miller v Cecil Film Ltd The principle allowing damages for loss of publicity was extended to screen credit in Tolnay v Criterion Film Productions Ltd [1936] 2 All ER 1625. In that case there was a contract to give screen credit to the authors.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-15', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(5947, 'Miller v Cecil Film Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Miller v Cecil Film Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Andrew Purves Sutton & Creery., Lawrence Dennis & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Miller v Cecil Film Ltd The principle allowing damages for loss of publicity was extended to screen credit in Tolnay v Criterion Film Productions Ltd [1936] 2 All ER 1625. In that case there was a contract to give screen credit to the authors.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-15', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(5948, 'Mitcham Golf Course Trustees v Ereaut', '', '../links/cases/Mitcham Golf Course Trustees v Ereaut.pdf', 'Yes', 'F R Allen', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Mitcham Golf Course Trustees v Ereaut The appellants carried on, under a licence granted by the conservators of a common, a golf course upon part of the common. The appellants had exclusive right to construct and maintain the golf course, to dig gravel and soil, and to cut turf and gorse for the purpose of maintaining the course, and to turn out sheep for the purpose of keeping down the grass and making the turf suitable for playing golf.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'TAXATION'),
(5949, 'Mitcham Golf Course Trustees v Ereaut', '', '../links/cases/Mitcham Golf Course Trustees v Ereaut.pdf', 'Yes', 'F R Allen', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Mitcham Golf Course Trustees v Ereaut The appellants carried on, under a licence granted by the conservators of a common, a golf course upon part of the common. The appellants had exclusive right to construct and maintain the golf course, to dig gravel and soil, and to cut turf and gorse for the purpose of maintaining the course, and to turn out sheep for the purpose of keeping down the grass and making the turf suitable for playing golf.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'TAXATION'),
(5950, 'Molins v Industrial Machinery Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Molins v Industrial Machinery Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bristows Cook & Carpmael., Cooke & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Molins v Industrial Machinery Co Ltd The plaintiffs were the owners of letters patent relating to a cigarette-making machine, the feature of which was that it had slanting vanes which ensured that the shower of tobacco falling upon the paper should not have a vertical movement, but should have a component of motion in the direction in which the paper was moving.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(5951, 'Molins v Industrial Machinery Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Molins v Industrial Machinery Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bristows Cook & Carpmael., Cooke & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Molins v Industrial Machinery Co Ltd The plaintiffs were the owners of letters patent relating to a cigarette-making machine, the feature of which was that it had slanting vanes which ensured that the shower of tobacco falling upon the paper should not have a vertical movement, but should have a component of motion in the direction in which the paper was moving.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(5952, 'Morgan v Ashcroft', '', '../links/cases/Morgan v Ashcroft.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ingledew Sons & Brown., Moxon & Petty., Everett & Everett', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Morgan v Ashcroft A bookmaker brought an action for money had and received in order to recover a sum of money which he had accidentally overpaid the defendant, one of his clients, in respect of wagering transactions:—', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(5953, 'Morgan v Ashcroft', '', '../links/cases/Morgan v Ashcroft.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ingledew Sons & Brown., Moxon & Petty., Everett & Everett', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Morgan v Ashcroft A bookmaker brought an action for money had and received in order to recover a sum of money which he had accidentally overpaid the defendant, one of his clients, in respect of wagering transactions:—', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(5954, 'Morley (Inspector of Taxes) v Tattersall', '', '../links/cases/Morley.pdf', 'Yes', 'Baileys Shaw & Gillett', '1937', 'High Court', 'Morley (Inspector of Taxes) v Tattersall A firm of auctioneers by their conditions of sale provided that vendors should receive the purchase money on the Monday week following the sale, and that no money would be paid or remittance sent by post without a written order.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-00', 'TAXATION'),
(5955, 'Morley (Inspector of Taxes) v Tattersall', '', '../links/cases/Morley.pdf', 'Yes', 'Baileys Shaw & Gillett', '1937', 'High Court', 'Morley (Inspector of Taxes) v Tattersall A firm of auctioneers by their conditions of sale provided that vendors should receive the purchase money on the Monday week following the sale, and that no money would be paid or remittance sent by post without a written order.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-00', 'TAXATION'),
(5956, 'Morris v Winsbury-White', '', '../links/cases/Morris v Winsbury.pdf', 'Yes', 'Edward Oliver & Co., Hempsons', '1937', 'High Court', 'Morris v Winsbury-White The defendant agreed to perform a surgical operation upon the plaintiff and to give the case his personal attention. After the operation, the plaintiff remained in the hospital, and was attended by nurses and resident medical officers on the hospital staff.', 'Gerald Abrahams Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-10', 'PROFESSIONS'),
(5957, 'Morris v Winsbury-White', '', '../links/cases/Morris v Winsbury.pdf', 'Yes', 'Edward Oliver & Co., Hempsons', '1937', 'High Court', 'Morris v Winsbury-White The defendant agreed to perform a surgical operation upon the plaintiff and to give the case his personal attention. After the operation, the plaintiff remained in the hospital, and was attended by nurses and resident medical officers on the hospital staff.', 'Gerald Abrahams Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-10', 'PROFESSIONS'),
(5958, 'Moss’ Empires Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Moss vrs inlang revenue comissioner.pdf', 'Yes', 'Burton & Ramsden., Allan Dawson Simpson & Hampton., WS Edinburgh', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Moss’ Empires Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners By an agreement between three companies, two of the companies, one being the appellant company, jointly and severally guaranteed that, in case the profits available for distribution as dividend on the ordinary shares of the third company should be insufficient to pay a', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-24', 'TAXATION'),
(5959, 'Moss’ Empires Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Moss vrs inlang revenue comissioner.pdf', 'Yes', 'Burton & Ramsden., Allan Dawson Simpson & Hampton., WS Edinburgh', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Moss’ Empires Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners By an agreement between three companies, two of the companies, one being the appellant company, jointly and severally guaranteed that, in case the profits available for distribution as dividend on the ordinary shares of the third company should be insufficient to pay a', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-24', 'TAXATION'),
(5960, 'Motor Traders Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Midland Bank Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Motor Traders Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Midland Bank Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Dennes & Co., Latchams & Montague., Coward Chance & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Motor Traders Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Midland Bank Ltd Turner, a motor trader in Bristol, had an account with the defendant bank. He induced the plaintiffs, a hire-purchase finance firm, to make out a cheque to W & Co for £189 5s, which cheque was crossed and marked not negotiable in print.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-15', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5961, 'Motor Traders Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Midland Bank Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Motor Traders Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Midland Bank Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Dennes & Co., Latchams & Montague., Coward Chance & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Motor Traders Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Midland Bank Ltd Turner, a motor trader in Bristol, had an account with the defendant bank. He induced the plaintiffs, a hire-purchase finance firm, to make out a cheque to W & Co for £189 5s, which cheque was crossed and marked not negotiable in print.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-15', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5962, 'Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian Temperance and General Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd', '', '', 'Yes', 'Gamlen Bowerman & Forward., Hewitt Woollacott & Chown', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian Temperance and General Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd The appellants, a body corporate constituted under the Municipal Corporations Act 1933, and the local authority of a suburban borough in the city of Auckland, are a local body within the meaning of the Local Bodies Loans Act 1933.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-18', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5963, 'Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian Temperance and General Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd', '', '', 'Yes', 'Gamlen Bowerman & Forward., Hewitt Woollacott & Chown', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian Temperance and General Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd The appellants, a body corporate constituted under the Municipal Corporations Act 1933, and the local authority of a suburban borough in the city of Auckland, are a local body within the meaning of the Local Bodies Loans Act 1933.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-18', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5964, 'Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian Temperance and General Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian Temperance and General Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gamlen Bowerman & Forward., Hewitt Woollacott & Chown', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Mount Albert Borough Council v Australasian Temperance and General Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd The appellants, a body corporate constituted under the Municipal Corporations Act 1933, and the local authority of a suburban borough in the city of Auckland, are a local body within the meaning of the Local Bodies Loans Act 1933.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-18', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5965, 'Murray v Redpath, Brown & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Murray v Redpath.pdf', 'Yes', 'Shaen Roscoe Massey & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Murray v Redpath, Brown & Co Ltd In the taxation of costs in an action in the county court the registrar taxed the items for instructions for brief and for counsel’s fee respectively at £6 6s and £8 8s, being the maximum figures appearing in the relevant scale. Upon a review of this taxation the judge allowed a fee of £21 for the first item and £10 10s for the second:—', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-19', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(5966, 'Murray v Redpath, Brown & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Murray v Redpath.pdf', 'Yes', 'Shaen Roscoe Massey & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Murray v Redpath, Brown & Co Ltd In the taxation of costs in an action in the county court the registrar taxed the items for instructions for brief and for counsel’s fee respectively at £6 6s and £8 8s, being the maximum figures appearing in the relevant scale. Upon a review of this taxation the judge allowed a fee of £21 for the first item and £10 10s for the second:—', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-19', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(5967, 'Murray v Schwachman Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Murray v Schwachman Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'T V Edwards., C St A Butcher', '1937', 'High Court', 'Murray v Schwachman Ltd An infant employee in a woodworking factory was injured while operating a spindle machine. The machine had been supplied with a guard, but in view of the waste of time caused by the use of the guard, the employee was instructed by his employers to operate the machine without the guard, and was doing so at the time of the accident.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-23', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5968, 'Murray v Schwachman Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Murray v Schwachman Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'T V Edwards., C St A Butcher', '1937', 'High Court', 'Murray v Schwachman Ltd An infant employee in a woodworking factory was injured while operating a spindle machine. The machine had been supplied with a guard, but in view of the waste of time caused by the use of the guard, the employee was instructed by his employers to operate the machine without the guard, and was doing so at the time of the accident.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-23', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5969, 'Murray v Thomas', '', '../links/cases/Murray v Thomas.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sole Sawbridge & Co., E F Turner & Sons', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Murray v Thomas Included in the objects of an association formed by adjacent villages in 1917 was one for the erection of a permanent memorial or memorials to perpetuate the memory of those from the district who served in the Great War.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-23', 'CHARITIES'),
(5970, 'Nabarro v Frederick Cope & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Nabarro v Frederick Cope.pdf', 'Yes', 'A D N Nabarro., Hair & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Nabarro v Frederick Cope & Co Ltd The plaintiff engaged the defendants, a firm of building contractors, to build a house for him, and he gave them possession of the site in accordance with the building contract. The plaintiff visited the premises about a dozen times while the house was in the course of construction and on each occasion the defendants’ foreman went round with him.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-21', 'TORTS'),
(5971, 'Nabarro v Frederick Cope & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Nabarro v Frederick Cope.pdf', 'Yes', 'A D N Nabarro., Hair & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Nabarro v Frederick Cope & Co Ltd The plaintiff engaged the defendants, a firm of building contractors, to build a house for him, and he gave them possession of the site in accordance with the building contract. The plaintiff visited the premises about a dozen times while the house was in the course of construction and on each occasion the defendants’ foreman went round with him.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-21', 'TORTS'),
(5972, 'National Mortgage and Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/National Mortgage and Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Freshfields Leese & Munns.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'National Mortgage and Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners A company, incorporated under the Companies Act in England, and controlled in England, carried on in New Zealand a business of lending money on mortgages and short loans. The company occupied certain land in New Zealand for the purposes of its business, and in respect thereof was allowed in New Zealand a special deduction from its assessable income of 5 per cent.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-11', 'TAXATION'),
(5973, 'National Mortgage and Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/National Mortgage and Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Freshfields Leese & Munns.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'National Mortgage and Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners A company, incorporated under the Companies Act in England, and controlled in England, carried on in New Zealand a business of lending money on mortgages and short loans. The company occupied certain land in New Zealand for the purposes of its business, and in respect thereof was allowed in New Zealand a special deduction from its assessable income of 5 per cent.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-11', 'TAXATION'),
(5974, 'National Mortgage and Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/National Mortgage and Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Freshfields Leese & Munns.,', '1937', 'High Court', 'National Mortgage and Agency Co of New Zealand Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners A company, incorporated under the Companies Act in England, and controlled in England, carried on in New Zealand a business of lending money on mortgages and short loans. The company occupied certain land in New Zealand for the purposes of its business, and in respect thereof was allowed in New Zealand a special deduction from its assessable income of 5 per cent.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-11', 'TAXATION'),
(5975, 'New Brunswick Railway Co v British & French Trust Corporation Ltd', '', '../links/cases/New Brunswick Railway Co v British.pdf', 'Yes', 'Linklaters & Paines., Allen & Overy', '1937', 'High Court', 'New Brunswick Railway Co v British & French Trust Corporation Ltd The defendants (the present appellants), a Canadian corporation, registered under the laws of New Brunswick, issued on 1 August 1884, 6,000 first mortgage gold bonds of like amount, tenor, and date. The bonds were secured by a mortgage trust deed, and all became due on 1 August 1934.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-13', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(5976, 'Newton v Lambton Hetton & Joicey Collieries Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Newton v Lambton Hetton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Rowcliffe & Co., Rowley Ashworth & Co., Cooper & Jackson.,Newcastle upon Tyne', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Newton v Lambton Hetton & Joicey Collieries Ltd The defendant company made an application to the local authority under the Private Street Works Act 1892 stating that it had made up a street to the satisfaction of the surveyor and asking that this street should be taken over by the authority as a street repairable by the inhabitants at large. The local authority thereupon made the order asked.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-08', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5977, 'Newton v Lambton Hetton & Joicey Collieries Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Newton v Lambton Hetton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Rowcliffe & Co., Rowley Ashworth & Co., Cooper & Jackson.,Newcastle upon Tyne', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Newton v Lambton Hetton & Joicey Collieries Ltd The defendant company made an application to the local authority under the Private Street Works Act 1892 stating that it had made up a street to the satisfaction of the surveyor and asking that this street should be taken over by the authority as a street repairable by the inhabitants at large. The local authority thereupon made the order asked.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-08', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5978, 'Newton v Lambton Hetton & Joicey Collieries Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Newton v Lambton Hetton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Rowcliffe & Co., Rowley Ashworth & Co., Cooper & Jackson.,Newcastle upon Tyne', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Newton v Lambton Hetton & Joicey Collieries Ltd The defendant company made an application to the local authority under the Private Street Works Act 1892 stating that it had made up a street to the satisfaction of the surveyor and asking that this street should be taken over by the authority as a street repairable by the inhabitants at large. The local authority thereupon made the order asked.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-08', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(5979, 'North Level Commissioners v River Welland Catchment Board', '', '../links/cases/North Level Commissioners v River Welland Catchment Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lee Ockerby & Co., Whittome & Co., Calthrop & Leopold Harvey', '1937', 'Appeal', 'North Level Commissioners v River Welland Catchment Board The River Welland from Peakirk to Brotherhouse Bar is bounded (a) by a natural bank, within which the water normally flows, (b) by the Cradge Bank, up to which the water flows at spring tides, and (c) beyond the latter bank at a distance varying from fifty yards to three-quarters of a mile by the Barrier Bank, which protects the land beyond it at times of abnormal flooding.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-13', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5980, 'North Level Commissioners v River Welland Catchment Board', '', '../links/cases/North Level Commissioners v River Welland Catchment Board.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lee Ockerby & Co., Whittome & Co., Calthrop & Leopold Harvey', '1937', 'Appeal', 'North Level Commissioners v River Welland Catchment Board The River Welland from Peakirk to Brotherhouse Bar is bounded (a) by a natural bank, within which the water normally flows, (b) by the Cradge Bank, up to which the water flows at spring tides, and (c) beyond the latter bank at a distance varying from fifty yards to three-quarters of a mile by the Barrier Bank, which protects the land beyond it at times of abnormal flooding.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-13', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(5981, 'O’Gorman v Paramount Film Service Ltd', '', '../links/cases/O vrs paramount film service.pdf', 'Yes', 'Vickress & Clare., Kerly Sons & Karuth', '1937', 'High Court', 'O’Gorman v Paramount Film Service Ltd The plaintiff was part author and composer of a play entitled Irish and Proud of It, and the owner of the copyright in the words and music of it. The play was first produced in 1914 and continued to be produced until 1924.', 'C M Young Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-11', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(5982, 'O’Gorman v Paramount Film Service Ltd', '', '../links/cases/O vrs paramount film service.pdf', 'Yes', 'Vickress & Clare., Kerly Sons & Karuth', '1937', 'High Court', 'O’Gorman v Paramount Film Service Ltd The plaintiff was part author and composer of a play entitled Irish and Proud of It, and the owner of the copyright in the words and music of it. The play was first produced in 1914 and continued to be produced until 1924.', 'C M Young Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-11', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY');
INSERT INTO `courtrulings` (`id`, `title`, `content`, `link`, `isshow`, `author`, `date`, `courttype`, `summary`, `presiding`, `casetype`, `subjectmatter`, `caseno`, `counsel1`, `counsel2`, `courtname`, `caseDate`, `subjectmattertitle`) VALUES
(5983, 'Odhams Press Ltd v Cook', '', '../links/cases/Odhams Press Ltd v Cook.pdf', 'Yes', 'Simmons & Simmons., Linklaters & Paines', '1938', 'High Court', 'Odhams Press Ltd v Cook The appellant company had a number of wholly controlled subsidiaries for which it did printing work. One of these companies, CF Ltd, during the year 1933–34 made a loss upon its trading operations of £2,927. The charge for printing during that year was £10,118, and the appellant company wrote off £2,927 from that sum and contended that that sum of £2,927 was a proper deduction against profits.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-28', 'TAXATION'),
(5984, 'Odhams Press Ltd v Cook', '', '../links/cases/Odhams Press Ltd v Cook.pdf', 'Yes', 'Simmons & Simmons., Linklaters & Paines', '1938', 'High Court', 'Odhams Press Ltd v Cook The appellant company had a number of wholly controlled subsidiaries for which it did printing work. One of these companies, CF Ltd, during the year 1933–34 made a loss upon its trading operations of £2,927. The charge for printing during that year was £10,118, and the appellant company wrote off £2,927 from that sum and contended that that sum of £2,927 was a proper deduction against profits.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-28', 'TAXATION'),
(5985, 'Official Trustee of Charity Lands and Another v Ferriman Trust Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Official Trustee of Charity Lands and Another v Ferriman Trust Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pedley May & Fletcher., Gale & Phelps', '1937', 'High Court', 'Official Trustee of Charity Lands and Another v Ferriman Trust Ltd The plaintiffs, as owners of the fee simple of land subject to a lease, in an action to recover possession of a number of houses on the ground of forfeiture for breach of covenant to repair, alleged that the defendant company held the premises as assignees of the lease.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(5986, 'Official Trustee of Charity Lands and Another v Ferriman Trust Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Official Trustee of Charity Lands and Another v Ferriman Trust Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pedley May & Fletcher., Gale & Phelps', '1937', 'High Court', 'Official Trustee of Charity Lands and Another v Ferriman Trust Ltd The plaintiffs, as owners of the fee simple of land subject to a lease, in an action to recover possession of a number of houses on the ground of forfeiture for breach of covenant to repair, alleged that the defendant company held the premises as assignees of the lease.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(5987, 'Onesimus Dorey & Sons Ltd v Headley’s Wharf Ltd and William Ashby Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Onesimus Dorey.pdf', 'Yes', 'Holman Fenwick & Willan., Keene Marshall Bryden Besant William Charles Crocker & Cork.,', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Onesimus Dorey & Sons Ltd v Headley’s Wharf Ltd and William Ashby Ltd The plaintiffs were the owners of a coasting vessel, the Belvedere, and the defendants were respectively the owners of A’s wharf and H’s wharf, which adjoined each other on the south side of Deptford Creek.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-09', 'SHIPPING'),
(5988, 'Onesimus Dorey & Sons Ltd v Headley’s Wharf Ltd and William Ashby Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Onesimus Dorey.pdf', 'Yes', 'Holman Fenwick & Willan., Keene Marshall Bryden Besant William Charles Crocker & Cork.,', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Onesimus Dorey & Sons Ltd v Headley’s Wharf Ltd and William Ashby Ltd The plaintiffs were the owners of a coasting vessel, the Belvedere, and the defendants were respectively the owners of A’s wharf and H’s wharf, which adjoined each other on the south side of Deptford Creek.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-09', 'SHIPPING'),
(5989, 'Ormond v C D Holmes & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Ormond v C D Holmes.pdf', 'Yes', 'Russell Jones & Co., Pearlman & Rosen., F G & H E Smith', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Ormond v C D Holmes & Co Ltd A blacksmith’s striker who had followed this at times strenuous occupation for years on 27 September 1935, had a stroke at home. He returned to work on 9 October. On 20 December he gradually became ill at work and collapsed at 10 am.', 'Derek H Kitchen Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'TORTS'),
(5990, 'Ormond v C D Holmes & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Ormond v C D Holmes.pdf', 'Yes', 'Russell Jones & Co., Pearlman & Rosen., F G & H E Smith', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Ormond v C D Holmes & Co Ltd A blacksmith’s striker who had followed this at times strenuous occupation for years on 27 September 1935, had a stroke at home. He returned to work on 9 October. On 20 December he gradually became ill at work and collapsed at 10 am.', 'Derek H Kitchen Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'TORTS'),
(5991, 'Oxford City Council v Oxfordshire County Council', '', '../links/cases/Oxford City Council v Oxfordshire County Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Cunliffe & Airy., F G Scott', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Oxford City Council v Oxfordshire County Council By the Oxford Extension Act 1928, certain areas, profitable from a rating authority’s point of view, were transferred from the respondents to the appellants. By the Local Government Act 1929, liability to repair roads was in certain cases transferred to county councils.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-13', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(5992, 'Oxford City Council v Oxfordshire County Council', '', '../links/cases/Oxford City Council v Oxfordshire County Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Cunliffe & Airy., F G Scott', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Oxford City Council v Oxfordshire County Council By the Oxford Extension Act 1928, certain areas, profitable from a rating authority’s point of view, were transferred from the respondents to the appellants. By the Local Government Act 1929, liability to repair roads was in certain cases transferred to county councils.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-13', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(5993, 'Paget v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Paget v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Allen & Overy.,', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Paget v Inland Revenue Commissioners (i) P was the holder of 4½ per cent bearer bonds of the city of Budapest. By the terms of the bonds interest coupons attached thereto were payable in London in sterling and in certain other countries. By a decree of the Hungarian government, the municipality of Budapest was directed to deposit with the Hungarian National Bank, as the payments of interest fell due, the equivalent in pengos of the sum owed.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-30', 'TAXATION'),
(5994, 'Paget v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Paget v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Allen & Overy.,', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Paget v Inland Revenue Commissioners (i) P was the holder of 4½ per cent bearer bonds of the city of Budapest. By the terms of the bonds interest coupons attached thereto were payable in London in sterling and in certain other countries. By a decree of the Hungarian government, the municipality of Budapest was directed to deposit with the Hungarian National Bank, as the payments of interest fell due, the equivalent in pengos of the sum owed.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-30', 'TAXATION'),
(5995, 'Paine v Colne Valley Electricity Supply Co Ltd and British Insulated Cables Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Paine v Colne Valley Electricity Supply Co Ltd and British Insulated Cables Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'T & N Blanco White., Clifford G Turner., James Turner & Son', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Paine v Colne Valley Electricity Supply Co Ltd and British Insulated Cables Ltd The first defendants, as suppliers of electricity, conveyed high voltage current to kiosks in which transformers were housed. These kiosks, which had been manufactured and supplied to the first defendants by the second defendants, were arranged in 3 cubicles.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-23', 'TORTS'),
(5996, 'Paine v Colne Valley Electricity Supply Co Ltd and British Insulated Cables Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Paine v Colne Valley Electricity Supply Co Ltd and British Insulated Cables Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'T & N Blanco White., Clifford G Turner., James Turner & Son', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Paine v Colne Valley Electricity Supply Co Ltd and British Insulated Cables Ltd The first defendants, as suppliers of electricity, conveyed high voltage current to kiosks in which transformers were housed. These kiosks, which had been manufactured and supplied to the first defendants by the second defendants, were arranged in 3 cubicles.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-23', 'TORTS'),
(5997, 'Paine & Co Ltd v St Neots Gas & Coke Co', '', '../links/cases/Paine.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lovell White & King., Crossman Block & Co., Wade-Gery & Brackenbury', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Paine & Co Ltd v St Neots Gas & Coke Co The plaintiffs were manufacturers of malt extract, and for that purpose they required a large supply of pure water. Their premises and those of the defendants adjoined a common, and on this common the plaintiffs had sunk a well, from which they carried water through a defined pipe to their mill.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-24', 'LAND '),
(5998, 'Paine & Co Ltd v St Neots Gas & Coke Co', '', '../links/cases/Paine.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lovell White & King., Crossman Block & Co., Wade-Gery & Brackenbury', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Paine & Co Ltd v St Neots Gas & Coke Co The plaintiffs were manufacturers of malt extract, and for that purpose they required a large supply of pure water. Their premises and those of the defendants adjoined a common, and on this common the plaintiffs had sunk a well, from which they carried water through a defined pipe to their mill.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-24', 'LAND '),
(5999, 'Paine & Co Ltd v St Neots Gas & Coke Co', '', '../links/cases/Paine.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lovell White & King., Crossman Block & Co., Wade-Gery & Brackenbury', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Paine & Co Ltd v St Neots Gas & Coke Co The plaintiffs were manufacturers of malt extract, and for that purpose they required a large supply of pure water. Their premises and those of the defendants adjoined a common, and on this common the plaintiffs had sunk a well, from which they carried water through a defined pipe to their mill.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-24', 'LAND '),
(6000, 'Pakenham v Pakenham', '', '../links/cases/Pakenham v Pakenham.pdf', 'Yes', 'King’s Proctor; Kinch & Richardson.,D Hughes & Roberts., Layton & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Pakenham v Pakenham Where the King’s Proctor is investigating a certain matter at the request of the court, and, in the discharge of his duties, he wishes to interview one of the parties to a suit, there is no need for him to approach in the first place the solicitor on the record representing that party.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-02', 'FAMILY'),
(6001, 'Pakenham v Pakenham', '', '../links/cases/Pakenham v Pakenham.pdf', 'Yes', 'King’s Proctor; Kinch & Richardson.,D Hughes & Roberts., Layton & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Pakenham v Pakenham Where the King’s Proctor is investigating a certain matter at the request of the court, and, in the discharge of his duties, he wishes to interview one of the parties to a suit, there is no need for him to approach in the first place the solicitor on the record representing that party.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-02', 'FAMILY'),
(6002, 'Palmer v Watts, Watts & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Palmer v Watts.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barlow Lyde & Gilbert.,Randell Saunders & Randell., John T Lewis & Woods', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Palmer v Watts, Watts & Co Ltd A workman had, for several years before 1929, been employed as a shipwright, to which trade he had been apprenticed. In 1929, owing to depression in the shipbuilding industry, he obtained employment in the appellant company’s colliery as a pumpsman and hitcher.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-29', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6003, 'Perry v Sharon Development Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Perry v Sharon Development Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'De Meza & Menasse., Hanchett Copley & Hails', '1937', 'High Court', 'Perry v Sharon Development Co Ltd The plaintiff on 19 December 1935, entered into an agreement for the purchase of a house stated to be “erected or in the course of erection.â€ The balance of the purchase money was to be paid, and completion to be made, on 7 January 1936, or “so soon thereafter as the premises shall be completely finished and ready for occupation.â€', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-16', 'LAND '),
(6004, 'Perry v Sharon Development Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Perry v Sharon Development Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'De Meza & Menasse., Hanchett Copley & Hails', '1937', 'High Court', 'Perry v Sharon Development Co Ltd The plaintiff on 19 December 1935, entered into an agreement for the purchase of a house stated to be “erected or in the course of erection.â€ The balance of the purchase money was to be paid, and completion to be made, on 7 January 1936, or “so soon thereafter as the premises shall be completely finished and ready for occupation.â€', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-16', 'LAND '),
(6005, 'Peters v General Accident & Life Assurance Corpn Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Peters v General Accident.pdf', 'Yes', 'Musson & Co., Kenneth Brown Baker Baker', '1937', 'High Court', 'Peters v General Accident & Life Assurance Corpn Ltd The vendor of a motor car insured by the defendants handed over the insurance policy with the car to the purchaser. The policy contained the usual clause extending the cover to any person driving with the consent or permission of the insured.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-01', 'INSURANCE'),
(6006, 'Peters v General Accident & Life Assurance Corpn Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Peters v General Accident.pdf', 'Yes', 'Musson & Co., Kenneth Brown Baker Baker', '1937', 'High Court', 'Peters v General Accident & Life Assurance Corpn Ltd The vendor of a motor car insured by the defendants handed over the insurance policy with the car to the purchaser. The policy contained the usual clause extending the cover to any person driving with the consent or permission of the insured.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-01', 'INSURANCE'),
(6007, 'Philadelphia National Bank v Price', '', '../links/cases/Philadelphia National Bank v Price.pdf', 'Yes', 'Parker Garrett & Co., Hair & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Philadelphia National Bank v Price By a policy of insurance, under which the plaintiff bank was to be indemnified against all losses to which it might be put by reason of its having made loans against documents which might prove to have been invalid, it was provided that the insurers were to pay claims only for the excess of $25,000 ultimate net loss “by each and every loss or occurrence.â€', 'Malcolm Logan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-25', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(6008, 'Philippson v Imperial Airways Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Philippson v Imperial Airways Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ince Roscoe Wilson & Glover., Beaumont & Son', '1937', 'High Court', 'Philippson v Imperial Airways Ltd A consignment note for the carriage of gold from England to Belgium by air was subject to general conditions of carriage of goods based on the Convention of Warsaw. The conditions applied to both internal and international carriage.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-08', 'AVIATION'),
(6009, 'Philippson v Imperial Airways Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Philippson v Imperial Airways Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ince Roscoe Wilson & Glover., Beaumont & Son', '1937', 'High Court', 'Philippson v Imperial Airways Ltd A consignment note for the carriage of gold from England to Belgium by air was subject to general conditions of carriage of goods based on the Convention of Warsaw. The conditions applied to both internal and international carriage.', 'Leslie Carnegie Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-08', 'AVIATION'),
(6010, 'Pilkington v Pilkington', '', '../links/cases/Pilkington v Pilkington.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bolton Jobson & Yate-Lee', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Pilkington v Pilkington After the husband had left the home for some time, he telephoned his wife saying that he wanted his freedom and would give her the necessary evidence. The wife answered that she was surprised and that she would see her solicitors on the matter.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-16', 'FAMILY'),
(6011, 'Pilkington v Pilkington', '', '../links/cases/Pilkington v Pilkington.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bolton Jobson & Yate-Lee', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Pilkington v Pilkington After the husband had left the home for some time, he telephoned his wife saying that he wanted his freedom and would give her the necessary evidence. The wife answered that she was surprised and that she would see her solicitors on the matter.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-16', 'FAMILY'),
(6012, 'Plunkett v Plunkett', '', '../links/cases/Plunkett v Plunkett.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pickering Kenyon & Co., Clutterbuck Trevenen & Mawson', '1937', 'High Court', 'Plunkett v Plunkett At the hearing in October 1935, of a summons by a wife in respect of arrears of maintenance, due under a maintenance order for 30s per week made by consent in February 1931, the justices made a committal order to be suspended on payment of £50, the justices accepting an offer by the husband’s parents to pay £50 of the arrears and an undertaking to make the husband an allowance of 15s per week, and further varied the original order by reducing the weekly payment ordered from 30s to 15s, “which sum is to be paid by the parents of the complainant (the husband) they having given an undertaking so to do.â€', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-17', 'FAMILY'),
(6013, 'Plunkett v Plunkett', '', '../links/cases/Plunkett v Plunkett.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pickering Kenyon & Co., Clutterbuck Trevenen & Mawson', '1937', 'High Court', 'Plunkett v Plunkett At the hearing in October 1935, of a summons by a wife in respect of arrears of maintenance, due under a maintenance order for 30s per week made by consent in February 1931, the justices made a committal order to be suspended on payment of £50, the justices accepting an offer by the husband’s parents to pay £50 of the arrears and an undertaking to make the husband an allowance of 15s per week, and further varied the original order by reducing the weekly payment ordered from 30s to 15s, “which sum is to be paid by the parents of the complainant (the husband) they having given an undertaking so to do.â€', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-17', 'FAMILY'),
(6014, 'Pratt v Cook Son & Co', '', '../links/cases/Pratt v Cook Son.pdf', 'Yes', 'J N Mason & Co., Corbin Greener & Cook', '1938', 'High Court', 'Pratt v Cook Son & Co The plaintiff was employed as a packer by a firm of wholesale drapers at a weekly wage of 53s, and it was agreed that dinner and tea supplied by the firm were worth an additional 10s per week.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-11', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6015, 'Prestige & Co Ltd v Brettell', '', '../links/cases/Prestige.pdf', 'Yes', 'H W Perkins & Co., Leighton & Savory', '1938', 'High Court', 'Prestige & Co Ltd v Brettell The builders under a building contract applied to the architect for a certificate. The architect refused to issue the same, on the ground that he had had a complaint from the building owner with reference to the work.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-10-20', 'CONSTRUCTION:'),
(6016, 'Provident Accident & White Cross Insurance Co Ltd v Dahne and White', '', '../links/cases/Provident Accident.pdf', 'Yes', 'Blyth Dutton Hartley & Blyth., Davies Arnold & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Provident Accident & White Cross Insurance Co Ltd v Dahne and White On 6 June 1930, in consideration of the issue by the plaintiff company of a bond on behalf of F “in favour of the Gower R.D.C.,â€ in connection with a contract for road improvement, the defendants undertook to indemnify the plaintiff company against all losses incurred in consequence of having issued the bond.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-23', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(6017, 'Pyrmont Ltd v Schott', '', '../links/cases/Pyrmont Ltd v Schott.pdf', 'Yes', 'Adler & Perowne., William A Crump & Son', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Pyrmont Ltd v Schott The Spanish peseta coinage was legal tender in Gibraltar before and up to 1898, when, by an order in council dated 9 August 1898, sterling money of Great Britain became the only legal tender, subject to certain exceptions not here material.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-01', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(6018, 'Pyrmont Ltd v Schott', '', '../links/cases/Pyrmont Ltd v Schott.pdf', 'Yes', 'Adler & Perowne., William A Crump & Son', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Pyrmont Ltd v Schott The Spanish peseta coinage was legal tender in Gibraltar before and up to 1898, when, by an order in council dated 9 August 1898, sterling money of Great Britain became the only legal tender, subject to certain exceptions not here material.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-01', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(6019, 'Queen Anne’s Bounty v Tithe Redemption Commission and Another', '', '../links/cases/Queen Anne tithe redemption commissioner.pdf', 'Yes', 'H Potter., Abell Jackson & Reece', '1937', 'High Court', 'Queen Anne’s Bounty v Tithe Redemption Commission and Another The plaintiffs were owners within the Tithe Act 1936, s 20(3), of a tithe rentcharge charged upon certain lands of which R was the owner and occupier. In September 1934, and in September 1936, the plaintiffs applied to the county court for an order for the recovery of sums due in respect of the tithe rentcharge.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-09', 'ECCLESIASTICAL'),
(6020, 'The appellant was charged, in addition to a charge of a substantive crime, with being a habitual criminal. Upon appeal it was objected that the prisoner had not been asked whether he desired to call any witnesses, which in fact he desired to do, and that he had not been given the opportunity of being represented by counsel:—', '', '../links/cases/R v Andrews.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lee Ockerby & Co., Whittome & Co., Calthrop & Leopold Harvey', '1938', 'Appeal', 'The appellant was charged, in addition to a charge of a substantive crime, with being a habitual criminal. Upon appeal it was objected that the prisoner had not been asked whether he desired to call any witnesses, which in fact he desired to do, and that he had not been given the opportunity of being represented by counsel:—', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-12', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6021, 'The appellant was charged, in addition to a charge of a substantive crime, with being a habitual criminal. Upon appeal it was objected that the prisoner had not been asked whether he desired to call any witnesses, which in fact he desired to do, and that he had not been given the opportunity of being represented by counsel:—', '', '../links/cases/R v Andrews.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lee Ockerby & Co., Whittome & Co., Calthrop & Leopold Harvey', '1938', 'Appeal', 'The appellant was charged, in addition to a charge of a substantive crime, with being a habitual criminal. Upon appeal it was objected that the prisoner had not been asked whether he desired to call any witnesses, which in fact he desired to do, and that he had not been given the opportunity of being represented by counsel:—', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-12', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6022, 'R v Barnstaple Justices, Ex parte Carder', '', '../links/cases/R v Barnstaple Justices.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Torr & Co., Toller Oerton & Balsdon Barnstaple', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Barnstaple Justices, Ex parte Carder The Cinematograph Act 1909, s 2(1), empowers county councils, or justices where the powers have been delegated to them, to grant licences to persons to use “premises specified in the licenceâ€ for the purposes of a cinema, subject to certain terms, conditions and restrictions.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-27', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(6023, 'R v Barnstaple Justices, Ex parte Carder', '', '../links/cases/R v Barnstaple Justices.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Torr & Co., Toller Oerton & Balsdon Barnstaple', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Barnstaple Justices, Ex parte Carder The Cinematograph Act 1909, s 2(1), empowers county councils, or justices where the powers have been delegated to them, to grant licences to persons to use “premises specified in the licenceâ€ for the purposes of a cinema, subject to certain terms, conditions and restrictions.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-27', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(6024, 'R v Boseley', '', '../links/cases/R v Boseley.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lee Ockerby & Co., Whittome & Co., Calthrop & Leopold Harvey', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Boseley After a trial at quarter sessions, the recorder granted a certificate, upon counsel submitting that he desired to argue the accuracy of the direction to the jury on one part of the case. The recorder stated that he adhered to his direction and granted the certificate merely to obviate any injustice:—', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-19', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6025, 'R v Cornwall County Valuation Committee and Others, Ex parte Falmouth Borough Council', '', '../links/cases/R v Cornwall County Valuation Committee and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Cunliffe & Airy., F G Scott', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Cornwall County Valuation Committee and Others, Ex parte Falmouth Borough Council A county valuation committee, finding that to a considerable extent prevailing assessments in the county were too low, proceeded to promote uniformity of assessment. The committee decided that it would be best to proceed by instalments and to re-value the county, area by area, over a number of years.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-17', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6026, 'R v Davis', '', '../links/cases/R v Davis.pdf', 'Yes', 'Linklaters & Paines', '1937', 'High Court', 'R v Davis The appellant was charged upon an indictment which contained two counts, the first charging that on a day between 20 April and 29 April 1937, he murdered his wife, and the second charging that on a day between 21 April and 29 April 1937, he murdered his niece.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-12', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6027, 'R v Findlater', '', '../links/cases/R v Findlater.pdf', 'Yes', 'H Baron & Co', '1938', 'Supreme', 'R v Findlater The appellant was indicted upon a charge of conspiring with 6 other named persons and certain other persons unknown to contravene the Companies Act 1929, s 356(1), and also of causing and procuring 3 of the 6 named persons to go from house to house offering shares for subscription or purchase to the public, in contravention of that section. Three canvassers called upon persons who had already subscribed for “unitsâ€ and offered “founder’s unitsâ€ for sale.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-19', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6028, 'R v Findlater', '', '../links/cases/R v Findlater.pdf', 'Yes', 'H Baron & Co', '1938', 'Supreme', 'R v Findlater The appellant was indicted upon a charge of conspiring with 6 other named persons and certain other persons unknown to contravene the Companies Act 1929, s 356(1), and also of causing and procuring 3 of the 6 named persons to go from house to house offering shares for subscription or purchase to the public, in contravention of that section. Three canvassers called upon persons who had already subscribed for “unitsâ€ and offered “founder’s unitsâ€ for sale.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-19', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6029, 'R v Fowler', '', '../links/cases/R v Fowler.pdf', 'Yes', 'Theodore Elman & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'R v Fowler The appellant was convicted of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of drink and was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment in the second division and disqualification from holding a licence for an indefinite period.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-23', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6030, 'R v Fowler', '', '../links/cases/R v Fowler.pdf', 'Yes', 'Theodore Elman & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'R v Fowler The appellant was convicted of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of drink and was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment in the second division and disqualification from holding a licence for an indefinite period.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-23', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6031, 'R v International Trustee for the Protection of Bondholders Akt', '', '../links/cases/R v International Trustee for the Protection of Bondholders Akt.pdf', 'Yes', 'Allen & Overy', '1937', 'Supreme', 'R v International Trustee for the Protection of Bondholders Akt The respondents (suppliants) were holders of three 20-year 5½ per cent coupon gold bonds for $1,000, $500, and $100, respectively, issued and repayable by the British government to the bearer or registered holder on 1 February 1937, at the option of the holder in New York or London, and, if in New York, in gold coin of the United States of America of the standard of weight and fineness existing on 1 February 1917, and, if in London, in sterling money, at the fixed rate of $4.86½ to the £.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-15', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6032, 'R v Kurasch', '', '../links/cases/R v Kurasch.pdf', 'Yes', 'J Albert Davis & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'R v Kurasch The appellant was charged with larceny and conspiracy. The facts of the crime were that with two others the appellant obtained £2,300 from a person by a trick in the course of a transaction in which that person intended to purchase a number of Kruger sovereigns for that sum.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-23', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6033, 'R v Lewis', '', '../links/cases/R v Lewis.pdf', 'Yes', 'Webster Butcher & Sons., Harry Chandler', '1937', 'High Court', 'R v Lewis The prisoner was charged with receiving property, well knowing the same to have been stolen. The defence was that the prisoner had been the innocent victim of the actual thieves, who had “plantedâ€ the property on him.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-09', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6034, 'R v Lewis', '', '../links/cases/R v Lewis.pdf', 'Yes', 'Webster Butcher & Sons., Harry Chandler', '1937', 'High Court', 'R v Lewis The prisoner was charged with receiving property, well knowing the same to have been stolen. The defence was that the prisoner had been the innocent victim of the actual thieves, who had “plantedâ€ the property on him.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-09', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6035, 'R v Manchester Justices, Ex parte Lever', '', '../links/cases/R v Manchester Justices.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wontner & Sons., Church Adams Tatham & Co., Wheeler & Leslie M Lever & Co.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Manchester Justices, Ex parte Lever On 20 January 1937, the applicant was charged with having committed two motoring offences. He did not appear in court, and the magistrates after hearing evidence convicted him and imposed fines of 20s and 10s.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-29', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6036, 'R v Manchester Justices, Ex parte Lever', '', '../links/cases/R v Manchester Justices.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wontner & Sons., Church Adams Tatham & Co., Wheeler & Leslie M Lever & Co.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Manchester Justices, Ex parte Lever On 20 January 1937, the applicant was charged with having committed two motoring offences. He did not appear in court, and the magistrates after hearing evidence convicted him and imposed fines of 20s and 10s.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-29', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6037, 'R v Mordey, The Board of Control and East Ham Corporation, Ex parte Winterflood', '', '../links/cases/R v Mordey.pdf', 'Yes', 'E W Joslin., Town Clerk., East Ham', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Mordey, The Board of Control and East Ham Corporation, Ex parte Winterflood On 11 June 1929, an order was made under the Mental Deficiency Act 1913, that the applicant, being then a defective, should be detained in an institution. That order would expire on 25 June 1930, but it was continued by a continuance order made on 23 June 1930.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-27', 'CONSTITUTIONAl'),
(6038, 'R v Naylor', '', '../links/cases/R v Naylor.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Naylor It was held in R v Watkins (1910) 74 JP 382; 14 Digest 480, 5238 that it is incumbent upon the judge that he should consider the Prison Commissioners’ report, but need not reach the same conclusion. Clearly if this is to be done the report should state the reasons upon which it is based.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-15', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6039, 'R v Riordan', '', '../links/cases/R v Riordan.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Riordan The appellant was committed to quarter sessions with a view to his being detained in a Borstal Institution. At quarter sessions no counsel was instructed to prosecute. After the clerk of the court had informed the court how the appellant came to be there and the police officer had given evidence, the court, without giving the appellant an opportunity of addressing it, passed sentence of three years’ detention at a Borstal Institution.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-23', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6040, 'R v Rothfield', '', '../links/cases/R v Rothfield.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Rothfield The Court of Criminal Appeal will not inquire into the exercise of the discretion of a judge in granting leave to prefer a bill of indictment under the Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1933.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-08', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6041, 'R v Rule', '', '../links/cases/R v Rule.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lamport Bassitt & Hiscock., Sharpe Pritchard & Co,., Town Clerk', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Rule The appellant, who was an inhabitant of S and an elector, wrote to one of the members of parliament for S with the object of inducing him to help the appellant to bring certain matters, at first unspecified, to the attention of the Home Secretary or the Minister of Health.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-07', 'TORTS'),
(6042, 'R v Salford Assessment Committee', '', '../links/cases/R v Salford Assessment Committee.pdf', 'Yes', 'Peacock & Goddard., Elliot Smith & Co., Sharpe Pritchard.,Willcock Taylor & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Salford Assessment Committee The respondent committee resolved to appoint as clerk one B, who was an officer in the town clerk’s department of the city of Salford, the corporation being the rating authority. B was chief committee clerk to the city council, and as such he attended meetings of the rating committee of the city council for the purpose of taking minutes of its proceedings.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-01', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(6043, 'R v Sheffield Confirming Authority, Ex parte Truswell’s Brewery Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/R v Sheffield Confirming Authority.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Bremner Sons & Corlett., Turner & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Sheffield Confirming Authority, Ex parte Truswell’s Brewery Co Ltd A licensing confirming authority, which included six members of the local council who were also justices, refused to confirm an order for the provisional removal of a publican’s licence to proposed premises at another address.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-20', 'ADMINISTRATIVE'),
(6044, 'R v Southern Canada Power Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/R v Southern Canada Power Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Charles Russell & Co., Blake & Redden', '1937', 'High Court', 'R v Southern Canada Power Co Ltd A power company constructed a dam across the St Francis River. Upon the occasion of exceptional floods in the spring of 1928, a railway embankment was severely damaged and a serious accident occurred to a passenger train. The dam was constructed under statutory authority which provided that the owner or lessee of the work should be liable for all damages resulting therefrom whether from excessive elevation or otherwise.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(6045, 'R v Southern Canada Power Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/R v Southern Canada Power Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Charles Russell & Co., Blake & Redden', '1937', 'High Court', 'R v Southern Canada Power Co Ltd A power company constructed a dam across the St Francis River. Upon the occasion of exceptional floods in the spring of 1928, a railway embankment was severely damaged and a serious accident occurred to a passenger train. The dam was constructed under statutory authority which provided that the owner or lessee of the work should be liable for all damages resulting therefrom whether from excessive elevation or otherwise.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(6046, 'R v Sussex Confirming Authority, Ex parte Tamplin & Sons’ Brewery (Brighton) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/R v Sussex Confirming Authority.pdf', 'Yes', 'Thomas Eggar & Son., Nye & Donne., Edwin Boxall & Kempe.,Boxall & Boxall', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Sussex Confirming Authority, Ex parte Tamplin & Sons’ Brewery (Brighton) Ltd The licensing justices confirmed the grant of a licence for the sale by retail of any intoxicating liquor which might be sold under a spirit retailer’s (or publican’s) licence for consumption either on or off the premises, subject to certain conditions, one of which was in the following terms: “', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-21', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(6047, 'R v Tennet', '', '../links/cases/R v Tennet.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1938', 'Appeal', 'R v Tennet Upon a charge of receiving goods well knowing them to have been stolen, the judge in his summing up to the jury by inadvertence used the words: “They [the prosecution] have got to prove the important thing that, at the time he received them, or had them in his possession, he knew they were stolen.â€ The prisoner was convicted:—', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-16', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6048, 'R v Warn', '', '../links/cases/R v Warn.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Warn The prisoner was convicted at quarter sessions of theft. In passing sentence, there was taken into account a charge of forgery and a charge of obtaining money by false pretences in Ireland:', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-10', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6049, 'R v Wisbech, Isle of Ely, Licensing Justices, Ex parte Payne', '', '../links/cases/R v Wisbech.pdf', 'Yes', 'Golden Holme & Ward.,Mellows & Sons., Copeman & Pettefar', '1937', 'Appeal', 'R v Wisbech, Isle of Ely, Licensing Justices, Ex parte Payne Certain licensing justices made an order, under the Licensing Act 1921, s 1, directing that, during the months of June, July and August, 1937, s 1(1) of the Act of 1921 should have effect as though “eight and a halfâ€ were substituted for “eightâ€ and “half-past ten at nightâ€ were substituted for “ten at night.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-26', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(6050, 'R & P Properties Ltd v Baldwin', '', '../links/cases/R&T properties ltd vrs Baldwin.pdf', 'Yes', 'William Sedley & Co., Herbert A Phillips', '1938', 'High Court', 'R & P Properties Ltd v Baldwin', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-16', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(6051, 'Racecourse Betting Control Board v Wild', '', '../links/cases/Racecourse Betting Control Board v Wild.pdf', 'Yes', 'Simmons & Simmons., Linklaters & Paines', '1938', 'High Court', 'Racecourse Betting Control Board v Wild For the purpose of operating a totalisator, the owners of a racecourse erected certain buildings and granted to the Racecourse Betting Control Board a licence to use those buildings in consideration of a yearly payment. This payment was stated to be 12½ per cent of the cost of the construction of the buildings, but it was further provided that, whatever the cost of the construction might be, the annual payment should not be less than 12½ per cent of £23,000 or more than 12½ per cent of £27,000.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-09', 'TAXATION'),
(6052, 'Randall v Randall', '', '../links/cases/Randall v Randall.pdf', 'Yes', 'Taylor Willcocks & Co., Field Roscoe & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Randall v Randall The respondent had been detained in pursuance of an order under the Lunacy Acts since 16 May 1932, being detained in single care in a licensed house. The defect of mind from which the respondent was suffering was a mere absence of will power.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-06', 'FAMILY'),
(6053, 'Randall v Randall', '', '../links/cases/Randall v Randall.pdf', 'Yes', 'Taylor Willcocks & Co., Field Roscoe & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Randall v Randall The respondent had been detained in pursuance of an order under the Lunacy Acts since 16 May 1932, being detained in single care in a licensed house. The defect of mind from which the respondent was suffering was a mere absence of will power.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-06', 'FAMILY'),
(6054, 'Rawlings v Smith', '', '../links/cases/Rawlings v Smith.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hy S L Polak & Co., Douglas Grant & Dold', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Rawlings v Smith The respondent was charged under the Vagrancy Act 1824, s 4, with being a suspected person loitering in certain streets on 27 February 1937, with intent to commit a felony. It was proved that, on that date, at various times of the day and in different places, the respondent was looking into, and trying to open the doors of, unattended motor cars standing in the street.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-14', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6055, 'Rawsthorne v Ottley and Others', '', '../links/cases/Rawsthorne v Ottley and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wood Lord & Co.,Thomas J Backhouse., Sir George Etherton.,Eric G Floyd', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Rawsthorne v Ottley and Others A tip-up lorry in the charge of a single driver had delivered coke in a school playground and was driving away when a number of boys jumped on to the rear of the lorry causing the tipping part to tip up. Another boy, the plaintiff, had jumped on to the lorry immediately behind the driver’s cab and when the tipping part of the lorry was suddenly released it came down on the plaintiff and crushed his leg.', 'M D Chorlton Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-30', 'TORTS'),
(6056, 'Rawsthorne v Ottley and Others', '', '../links/cases/Rawsthorne v Ottley and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wood Lord & Co.,Thomas J Backhouse., Sir George Etherton.,Eric G Floyd', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Rawsthorne v Ottley and Others A tip-up lorry in the charge of a single driver had delivered coke in a school playground and was driving away when a number of boys jumped on to the rear of the lorry causing the tipping part to tip up. Another boy, the plaintiff, had jumped on to the lorry immediately behind the driver’s cab and when the tipping part of the lorry was suddenly released it came down on the plaintiff and crushed his leg.', 'M D Chorlton Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-30', 'TORTS'),
(6057, 'Re A Debtor (No 38 of 1938), Debtor v Petitioning Creditors and Official Receiver', '', '../links/cases/Re A Debtor.pdf', 'Yes', 'Yarde & Loader., Hyde Mahon & Pascall', '1938', 'High Court', 'Re A Debtor (No 38 of 1938), Debtor v Petitioning Creditors and Official Receiver On 3 March 1938, the brother and authorised agent of the appellant orally ordered from the respondents 5 kitchen fitments. Shortly after, the appellant made entries in his purchases day book and in his bought ledger recording the order and the price of the goods.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-14', 'SALE OF GOODS'),
(6058, 'Re a Judgment Debtor (No 2176 of 1938), Judgment Creditor v Judgment Debtor', '', '../links/cases/Re a Judgment Debtor.pdf', 'Yes', 'Blount Petre & Co., Weldon & Edwards', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Re a Judgment Debtor (No 2176 of 1938), Judgment Creditor v Judgment Debtor A creditor obtained a judgment against the debtor in the Court of Appeal in France. The judgment was duly registered in this country in accordance with the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933. The creditor then caused a bankruptcy notice to be served upon the debtor.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-20', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(6059, 'Re All Hallows, Lombard Street', '', '../links/cases/Re All Hallows.pdf', 'Yes', 'Horne & Birkett., Markby Stewart & Wadesons., Milles Jennings White & Foster', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re All Hallows, Lombard Street Under a scheme, put forward by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, two benefices in the city of London were to be united. It was further proposed that the parish church of the second benefice should be closed and taken down, and the site sold.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-09', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6060, 'Re An Application by Richard Woodward on behalf of Richard Woodward and Doris Woodward, trading', '', '../links/cases/Re An Application by Richard Woodward on behalf of Richard Woodward and Doris Woodward.pdf', 'Yes', 'Joynson-Hicks & Co., Henry Backhouse & Son', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re An Application by Richard Woodward on behalf of Richard Woodward and Doris Woodward, trading A haulage contractor was the holder of an “Aâ€ licence under the Road and Rail Traffic Act 1933. On his death his widow took out letters of administration to his estate and was granted an “Aâ€ licence. She was not, however, able to carry on the business, which was managed by one of the applicants, who had arranged to purchase the business from her.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-03', 'TRANSPORT'),
(6061, 'Re An Application by Richard Woodward on behalf of Richard Woodward and Doris Woodward, trading', '', '../links/cases/Re An Application by Richard Woodward on behalf of Richard Woodward and Doris Woodward.pdf', 'Yes', 'Joynson-Hicks & Co., Henry Backhouse & Son', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re An Application by Richard Woodward on behalf of Richard Woodward and Doris Woodward, trading A haulage contractor was the holder of an “Aâ€ licence under the Road and Rail Traffic Act 1933. On his death his widow took out letters of administration to his estate and was granted an “Aâ€ licence. She was not, however, able to carry on the business, which was managed by one of the applicants, who had arranged to purchase the business from her.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-03', 'TRANSPORT');
INSERT INTO `courtrulings` (`id`, `title`, `content`, `link`, `isshow`, `author`, `date`, `courttype`, `summary`, `presiding`, `casetype`, `subjectmatter`, `caseno`, `counsel1`, `counsel2`, `courtname`, `caseDate`, `subjectmattertitle`) VALUES
(6062, 'Re An Arbitration between British Metal Corporation Ltd and Ludlow Bros (1913) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re An Arbitration between British Metal Corporation Ltd and Ludlow Bros.pdf', 'Yes', 'Peacock & Goddard., Shakespeare & Vernon., Linklaters & Pains', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re An Arbitration between British Metal Corporation Ltd and Ludlow Bros (1913) Ltd A contract for the sale of goods was entered into “subject to the customary terms and conditions and subject to the rules and regulations of the London Metal Exchange, in so far as these rules and regulations do not conflict with the provisions of this contract.â€', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-22', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6063, 'Re Anchor Line (Henderson Bros) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Anchor Line.pdf', 'Yes', 'Collyer-Bristow & Co., Allen Edwards & Oldfield', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Anchor Line (Henderson Bros) Ltd A company incorporated under the English Companies Act, with its registered office in England, carried on a considerable part of its business in Scotland. In March 1934, the company executed in Scotland a charge in favour of a Scottish bank, charging its undertaking and all its property and assets, both present and future, which charge was to rank as a first charge on the undertaking of the company and all its property and assets whatsoever and wheresoever both present and future.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-28', 'COMPANY'),
(6064, 'Re Anglo-Continental Produce Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Anglo vrs cotinential produce Co ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Roche Son & Neale., Timbrell Deighton & Nichols', '1938', 'High Court', 'Re Anglo-Continental Produce Co Ltd A company presented a petition for its compulsory winding up, under the Companies Act 1929, s 186(6), on the ground that it was just and equitable that it should be wound up. The petition was presented as the outcome of a resolution to wind up carried by a majority, which was not a three-fourths majority, of the shareholders.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-21', 'COMPANY'),
(6065, 'Re Anglo-Continental Produce Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Anglo vrs cotinential produce Co ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Roche Son & Neale., Timbrell Deighton & Nichols', '1938', 'High Court', 'Re Anglo-Continental Produce Co Ltd A company presented a petition for its compulsory winding up, under the Companies Act 1929, s 186(6), on the ground that it was just and equitable that it should be wound up. The petition was presented as the outcome of a resolution to wind up carried by a majority, which was not a three-fourths majority, of the shareholders.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-21', 'COMPANY'),
(6066, 'Re Ashton’s Estate, Westminster Bank Ltd v Farley', '', '../links/cases/Re Ashton vrs farly.pdf', 'Yes', 'C W Radcliffe', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Ashton’s Estate, Westminster Bank Ltd v Farley The previous authorities had suggested that a gift for the purposes of the parish as distinct from those of the church might not be charitable as including objects not charitable in law, and that view is here adopted.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-04', 'CHARITIES'),
(6067, 'Re B P Fowler Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re B P Fowler Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'William A Crump & Son., Pritchard Englefield & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re B P Fowler Ltd The company being wound up had had business relations with two other companies. Within three months of the commencement of the winding up, the company now in liquidation owed money to the other two companies and the latter also owed money to the former.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-23', 'COMPANY'),
(6068, 'Re Barnes', '', '../links/cases/Re Barnes.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Re Barnes The Court of Appeal, without calling upon counsel for the Crown, dismissed, with costs, the appeal of the petitioner from the decision of Lawrence J given 22 June 1938 and reported [1938] 3 All ER 327. Sir Wilfrid Greene MR stated that the case was a perfectly clear one, and that the reasons for the decision of Lawrence J were stated so lucidly that it was unnecessary to say anything further.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-15', 'TAXATION'),
(6069, 'Re Beaumont Settled Estates', '', '../links/cases/Re Beaumont Settled Estates.pdf', 'Yes', 'Preston Lane-Claypon & O’Kelly., Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Beaumont Settled Estates Under a settlement of 1899 a jointure in favour of a widow was outstanding. In 1925 there was a resettlement by a disentailing deed under which a jointure rentcharge was created and certain charges by way of legal mortgage were made for raising jointures and portions.', 'C M Young Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-01', 'LAND '),
(6070, 'Re Berton, Vandyk v Berton', '', '../links/cases/Re Berton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Herbert Oppenheimer', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Re Berton, Vandyk v Berton A testator gave the income of the whole of his real and personal estate to two persons in equal shares. The will contained no express trust for sale, but, having regard to the provisions of the Law of Property Act 1925, relating to property held in undivided shares, the land included in the gift would become subject to a statutory trust for sale, including a power to postpone the sale.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-10-27', 'TRUST '),
(6071, 'Re Bridgen, Chaytor v Edwin', '', '../links/cases/Re Bridgen.pdf', 'Yes', 'Clarke Rawlins & Co.,Waldy Son & Chaytor.,  Darlington., Ravenscroft Woodward & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Bridgen, Chaytor v Edwin The testatrix, a spinster, made her will in the following terms: “I wish E and H to take possession of all my possessions to be held in trust after my death and divided equally amongst all my relationsâ€:—', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-05', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6072, 'Re Brighton (Everton Place Area) Housing Order 1937, E Robins & Son Ltd’s Application', '', '../links/cases/Re Brighton.pdf', 'Yes', 'R C Bartlett & Co., F W A Cushman & Son', '1938', 'High Court', 'Re Brighton (Everton Place Area) Housing Order 1937, E Robins & Son Ltd’s Application The applicants were the owners of a site which admittedly could properly be declared to be a clearance area. They had for some time been in communication with the local authority upon the question of the demolition of the property and the redevelopment of the site.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-17', 'HEALTH'),
(6073, 'Re C, An Infant', '', '../links/cases/Re C vrs an infant.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hughes Narborough & Thomas.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re C, An Infant A husband and wife sought to adopt, under the provisions of the Adoption of Children Act 1926, a girl aged 19, who was the illegitimate daughter of the wife. There was no blood relationship to the husband. The husband and wife were each less than 21 years older than the infant:—', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'FAMILY'),
(6074, 'Re Carville, Shone v Walthamstow Borough Council', '', '../links/cases/Re Carville.pdf', 'Yes', 'Frank Budd & Son., Mitchells', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Carville, Shone v Walthamstow Borough Council The testatrix, after giving certain legacies, and after providing for the upkeep of a grave, gave the two executors £100 each, and concluded as follows: “The residue to be disposed of as my executors shall think fitâ€:—', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-17', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6075, 'Re Chetwynd’s Estate, Dunn Trust Ltd v Brown', '', '../links/cases/Re Carville.pdf', 'Yes', 'Woolfe & Woolfe., Vizard Oldham Crowder & Cash., Patersons Snow & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Chetwynd’s Estate, Dunn Trust Ltd v Brown In 1930, at the request of C, who wished to borrow £120 from certain moneylenders, S signed with C a promissory note by which he and C promised jointly and severally to repay to the moneylenders £156 by 5 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £6, the first payment to be made on 24 November 1930, and the balance of £126 to become due and payable on 24 April 1931.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-02', 'CONTRACT'),
(6076, 'Re Cleadon Trust Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Cleadon Trust Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'T D Jones & Co., Bentleys Stokes & Lowless., Ord & Muckle', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Re Cleadon Trust Ltd The appellant was a director of three limited companies, one a parent company, the other two being subsidiary companies. The companies were private companies, largely, if not wholly, under the control of the appellant. The subsidiary companies were indebted in certain sums, and were without funds to meet the payment of those sums when they fell due.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-25', 'COMPANY'),
(6077, 'Re Coller’s Deed Trusts, Coller v Coller', '', '../links/cases/Re Coller vrs coller.pdf', 'Yes', 'Shapiro & Co., N Mackover', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Coller’s Deed Trusts, Coller v Coller Held – the weekly sums were neither a charge on the capital nor a continuing charge on the income of the trust fund. The direction in the deed as to surplus income arising during the widowhood of the testator’s widow showed that the parties to the deed intended that the weekly sums in any year should be paid out of the income of that year, and of that year alone.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-14', 'TRUSTS'),
(6078, 'Re Conley', '', '../links/cases/Re Conley.pdf', 'Yes', 'Durrant Cooper & Hambling., Linklaters & Paines., F W Perkins', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Conley In April 1931, and again in May 1933, the wife of the bankrupt deposited with a bank War Loan as collateral security for the bankrupt’s indebtedness to the bank. In February 1933, the bankrupt’s mother deposited certain War Loan and Building Society shares for the same purpose.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-22', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(6079, 'Re Copelin’s Contract', '', '../links/cases/Re Copelin.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gassman & Gassman', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Copelin’s Contract Upon a sale of land in 1936, the abstract of title commenced with a deed, dated 12 December 1900, and the abstract of that deed ended with the words “executed and attested.â€ It subsequently appeared that this deed had been executed under a power of attorney.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-18', 'LAND '),
(6080, 'Re Cousens', '', '../links/cases/Re Cousens.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gregory Rowcliffe & Co., Peace & Ellis Wigan., Jaques & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Cousens A E C was a lieutenant and quarter-master in the Territorial Army. He had received a commission signed by His Majesty. His pay was paid to him by cheques of the county Territorial Association, and the Association was repaid out of moneys provided by Parliament under the Territorial and Reserve Forces Act 1907:—', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-10', 'INSURANCE'),
(6081, 'Re Craven’s Estate, Lloyds Bank Ltd v Cockburn', '', '../links/cases/Re Craven.pdf', 'Yes', 'Morris Ward-Jones Kennett & Co., Gordon Dadds & Co., Vizard Oldham Crowder & Cash', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Craven’s Estate, Lloyds Bank Ltd v Cockburn A testatrix had given her son a power of attorney in very wide terms over certain shares and money standing in her name at a bank abroad. When about to undergo an operation she told the son to get such shares and money transferred into his own name as she wanted him to have them if anything should happen to her.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-27', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6082, 'Re Disraeli Agreement, Cleasby v Park Estates (Hughenden) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Disraeli Agreement.pdf', 'Yes', 'Rutland & Crauford., Winter-Taylor & Woodward., Savory Pryor & Blagden., Bliss Sons & Covell', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Re Disraeli Agreement, Cleasby v Park Estates (Hughenden) Ltd such resumption of possession would, by preventing the lessee giving the required notice, deprive the lessee of his right to compensation under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1923, and was, therefore, void under s 50 of the Act.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-29', 'AGRICULTURE'),
(6083, 'Re Downes & Lobbs’ Contract, Downes v Lobbs', '', '../links/cases/Re Downes.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bridges Sawtell & Co., G E Lowe & Son., Savage Cooper & Wrigh', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Downes & Lobbs’ Contract, Downes v Lobbs An agreement in writing giving an option to purchase land contained the following clause as to its duration and determination: “the option shall operate for three years certain from the date hereof and after the expiration of that time may be determined by the grantor giving to the grantee 12 months’ notice to terminate at the expiration of the said term or at any later dateâ€:—', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-04', 'LAND'),
(6084, 'Re Drake’s Settlement Trusts, Wilson v Drake', '', '../links/cases/Re Drake.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bircham & Co., Hartley & Blyth., Mrs Venice Tyrwhitt Drake', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Drake’s Settlement Trusts, Wilson v Drake By the combined effect of a settlement and a will, ETTD in 1915 became entitled to certain real property absolutely, should be survive the Great War, and, if he failed so to survive, such property went to GPTD absolutely, subject only to an annuity of £1,200 to the widow of ETTD.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-21', 'TAXATION'),
(6085, 'Re Drake’s Settlement Trusts, Wilson v Drake', '', '../links/cases/Re Drake.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bircham & Co., Hartley & Blyth., Mrs Venice Tyrwhitt Drake', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Drake’s Settlement Trusts, Wilson v Drake By the combined effect of a settlement and a will, ETTD in 1915 became entitled to certain real property absolutely, should be survive the Great War, and, if he failed so to survive, such property went to GPTD absolutely, subject only to an annuity of £1,200 to the widow of ETTD.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-21', 'TAXATION'),
(6086, 'Re Duce and Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd’s Contract', '', '../links/cases/Re Duce and Boots Cash Chemists.pdf', 'Yes', 'Mills & Morley., Taylor & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Duce and Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd’s Contract A testator by his will gave a freehold property to his son, whom he appointed his executor, upon trust to permit his daughter “to personally use and occupyâ€ the same free of rent, rates and taxes during her life or spinsterhood should she wish to do so, and also charged a sum of £1 10s per week upon that and other property for the benefit of the daughter for life or spinsterhood.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'LAND '),
(6087, 'Re Duce and Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd’s Contract', '', '../links/cases/Re Duce and Boots Cash Chemists.pdf', 'Yes', 'Mills & Morley., Taylor & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Duce and Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd’s Contract A testator by his will gave a freehold property to his son, whom he appointed his executor, upon trust to permit his daughter “to personally use and occupyâ€ the same free of rent, rates and taxes during her life or spinsterhood should she wish to do so, and also charged a sum of £1 10s per week upon that and other property for the benefit of the daughter for life or spinsterhood.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'LAND '),
(6088, 'Re Edwards’ Will Trusts, Brewer v Gething', '', '../links/cases/Re Edwards.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kinch & Richardson., Davis Lloyds & Wilson., Sherlock & King', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Edwards’ Will Trusts, Brewer v Gething In 1896 a beneficiary under a will mortgaged his interest in the estate. No payment of interest was made or acknowledgment given in respect of the mortgage. In 1935 the estate accounts and distribution statement were sent to the mortgagee by the trustees of the will.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-15', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6089, 'Re Edwards’ Will Trusts, Brewer v Gething', '', '../links/cases/Re Edwards.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kinch & Richardson., Davis Lloyds & Wilson., Sherlock & King', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Edwards’ Will Trusts, Brewer v Gething In 1896 a beneficiary under a will mortgaged his interest in the estate. No payment of interest was made or acknowledgment given in respect of the mortgage. In 1935 the estate accounts and distribution statement were sent to the mortgagee by the trustees of the will.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-15', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6090, 'Re Falmouth (Well Lane, Sedgmond’s Court and Smithick Hill) Clearance Order 1936', '', '../links/cases/Re Falmouth and clearance order.pdf', 'Yes', 'Peake & Co., Ratcliff Son & Henderson', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Falmouth (Well Lane, Sedgmond’s Court and Smithick Hill) Clearance Order 1936 A clearance order was made which related to an area including a house owned by the appellant, and the appellant was in due course served with notice of the making of the order. He lodged an objection to the order, in accordance with the provisions of the Housing Acts, and was duly served with notice of the principal grounds on which the local authority was satisfied that the premises were unfit for human habitation.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-15', 'HEALTH'),
(6091, 'Re Falmouth (Well Lane, Sedgmond’s Court and Smithick Hill) Clearance Order 1936', '', '../links/cases/Re Falmouth and clearance order.pdf', 'Yes', 'Peake & Co., Ratcliff Son & Henderson', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Falmouth (Well Lane, Sedgmond’s Court and Smithick Hill) Clearance Order 1936 A clearance order was made which related to an area including a house owned by the appellant, and the appellant was in due course served with notice of the making of the order. He lodged an objection to the order, in accordance with the provisions of the Housing Acts, and was duly served with notice of the principal grounds on which the local authority was satisfied that the premises were unfit for human habitation.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-15', 'HEALTH'),
(6092, 'Re Fox’s Estate, Dawes v Druitt, Phoenix Assurance Co Ltd v Fox', '', '../links/cases/Re Fox.pdf', 'Yes', 'Dawes & Sons., Lovell Son & Pitfield', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Fox’s Estate, Dawes v Druitt, Phoenix Assurance Co Ltd v Fox Testator gave all his “substanceâ€ to his executors upon trust as to one quarter for his daughter FS for her separate use, as to one other quarter for his daughter AC for her sole use for life, and thereafter for her children if she leave any equally, as to another quarter for the children of his deceased son GJ equally, and as to the last quarter for WS and TS.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-01', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6093, 'Re Fox’s Estate, Dawes v Druitt, Phoenix Assurance Co Ltd v Fox', '', '../links/cases/Re Fox.pdf', 'Yes', 'Dawes & Sons., Lovell Son & Pitfield', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Fox’s Estate, Dawes v Druitt, Phoenix Assurance Co Ltd v Fox Testator gave all his “substanceâ€ to his executors upon trust as to one quarter for his daughter FS for her separate use, as to one other quarter for his daughter AC for her sole use for life, and thereafter for her children if she leave any equally, as to another quarter for the children of his deceased son GJ equally, and as to the last quarter for WS and TS.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-01', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6094, 'Re G Winterbottom (Leeds) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re G Winterbottom.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Harrison & Sons., Maxwell Bailey & CoSimpson Curtis & Burrill.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re G Winterbottom (Leeds) Ltd Two directors of a company were also the landlords of premises occupied by the company. Rent was 5¼ years in arrear. The landlords levied a distress upon the goods of the company, but the distress had not been completed when the company passed a resolution for a voluntary winding up. The liquidator sought to prevent the completion of the distress:—', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-16', 'COMPANY'),
(6095, 'Re G Winterbottom (Leeds) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re G Winterbottom.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., Harrison & Sons., Maxwell Bailey & CoSimpson Curtis & Burrill.,', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re G Winterbottom (Leeds) Ltd Two directors of a company were also the landlords of premises occupied by the company. Rent was 5¼ years in arrear. The landlords levied a distress upon the goods of the company, but the distress had not been completed when the company passed a resolution for a voluntary winding up. The liquidator sought to prevent the completion of the distress:—', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-16', 'COMPANY'),
(6096, 'Re Gladitz, Guaranty Executor & Trustee Co Ltd v Gladitz', '', '../links/cases/Re Gladitz.pdf', 'Yes', 'Town Clerk., Deacon & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Gladitz, Guaranty Executor & Trustee Co Ltd v Gladitz By a policy of insurance, described as a Lloyd’s accident policy, certain sums, calculated according to a schedule, were expressed to be payable to the assured, his executors, administrators or assigns, in the event of bodily injury by accident, as therein specified, causing the death or disablement of the assured.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-02', 'INSURANCE'),
(6097, 'Re Gladitz, Guaranty Executor & Trustee Co Ltd v Gladitz', '', '../links/cases/Re Gladitz.pdf', 'Yes', 'Town Clerk., Deacon & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Gladitz, Guaranty Executor & Trustee Co Ltd v Gladitz By a policy of insurance, described as a Lloyd’s accident policy, certain sums, calculated according to a schedule, were expressed to be payable to the assured, his executors, administrators or assigns, in the event of bodily injury by accident, as therein specified, causing the death or disablement of the assured.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-02', 'INSURANCE'),
(6098, 'Re Glyn Valley Tramway Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Glyn Valley Tramway Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lovell Son & Pitfield., Walker Smith & Way., Heaton Meredith & Mills., Birch Cullimore & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Glyn Valley Tramway Co Ltd In the case of an ordinary limited company a debenture holder can, subject to the terms of his debenture, appoint a receiver, but in the case of a company carrying on a public undertaking it is clearly impossible to allow the public to be inconvenienced by the cesser of the undertaking in that way.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-06', 'COMPANY'),
(6099, 'Re Glyn Valley Tramway Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Glyn Valley Tramway Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lovell Son & Pitfield., Walker Smith & Way., Heaton Meredith & Mills., Birch Cullimore & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Glyn Valley Tramway Co Ltd In the case of an ordinary limited company a debenture holder can, subject to the terms of his debenture, appoint a receiver, but in the case of a company carrying on a public undertaking it is clearly impossible to allow the public to be inconvenienced by the cesser of the undertaking in that way.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-06', 'COMPANY'),
(6100, 'Re Greenwich (Prince of Orange Lane) Housing Order 1936', '', '../links/cases/Re Greenwich housing order.pdf', 'Yes', 'R C Bartlett & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Greenwich (Prince of Orange Lane) Housing Order 1936 The owner of certain property included in a compulsory purchase order contended that the onus was upon the local authority to satisfy the Minister of Health that, by making a compulsory purchase order rather than a clearance order, it had chosen the most appropriate method for securing the clearance of the area:—', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-11', 'HEALTH'),
(6101, 'Re Greenwich (Prince of Orange Lane) Housing Order 1936', '', '../links/cases/Re Greenwich housing order.pdf', 'Yes', 'R C Bartlett & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Greenwich (Prince of Orange Lane) Housing Order 1936 The owner of certain property included in a compulsory purchase order contended that the onus was upon the local authority to satisfy the Minister of Health that, by making a compulsory purchase order rather than a clearance order, it had chosen the most appropriate method for securing the clearance of the area:—', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-11', 'HEALTH'),
(6102, 'Re Greenwich (Prince of Orange Lane) Housing Order 1936', '', '../links/cases/Re Greenwich housing order.pdf', 'Yes', 'R C Bartlett & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Greenwich (Prince of Orange Lane) Housing Order 1936 The owner of certain property included in a compulsory purchase order contended that the onus was upon the local authority to satisfy the Minister of Health that, by making a compulsory purchase order rather than a clearance order, it had chosen the most appropriate method for securing the clearance of the area:—', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-11', 'HEALTH'),
(6103, 'Re Hammersmith (Berghem Mews) Clearance Order 1936', '', '../links/cases/Re Hammersmith.pdf', 'Yes', 'Herbert A Phillips', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Hammersmith (Berghem Mews) Clearance Order 1936 A clearance order was made in respect of certain premises consisting of garages and workshops with dwelling rooms over, the dwellings not being let, occupied or used in connection with the garages and not being in communication therewith.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-07', 'HEALTH'),
(6104, 'Re Hammersmith (Berghem Mews) Clearance Order 1936', '', '../links/cases/Re Hammersmith.pdf', 'Yes', 'Herbert A Phillips', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Hammersmith (Berghem Mews) Clearance Order 1936 A clearance order was made in respect of certain premises consisting of garages and workshops with dwelling rooms over, the dwellings not being let, occupied or used in connection with the garages and not being in communication therewith.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-07', 'HEALTH'),
(6105, 'Re Hayter, Hayter v Tranter', '', '../links/cases/Re Hayter.pdf', 'Yes', 'Taylor Willcocks & Co., Kinneir Jupp & Southan., Matthew J Jarvis', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Hayter, Hayter v Tranter A testator by his will gave “everything I die possessed ofâ€ to E T. The testator’s father by his will bequeathed half his residuary estate to the testator. The testator died in 1933, and his father died in 1934, leaving him surviving the testator’s two children, with the result that, by virtue of the Wills Act 1837, s 33, the testator was to be presumed to have survived his father, so as to prevent the operation of the doctrine of lapse in respect of the half share of residue bequeathed to him by his father’s will.', 'C M Young Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-11', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6106, 'Re Hayter, Hayter v Tranter', '', '../links/cases/Re Hayter.pdf', 'Yes', 'Taylor Willcocks & Co., Kinneir Jupp & Southan., Matthew J Jarvis', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Hayter, Hayter v Tranter A testator by his will gave “everything I die possessed ofâ€ to E T. The testator’s father by his will bequeathed half his residuary estate to the testator. The testator died in 1933, and his father died in 1934, leaving him surviving the testator’s two children, with the result that, by virtue of the Wills Act 1837, s 33, the testator was to be presumed to have survived his father, so as to prevent the operation of the doctrine of lapse in respect of the half share of residue bequeathed to him by his father’s will.', 'C M Young Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-11', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6107, 'Re Higham, Higham v Higham', '', '../links/cases/Re Higham.pdf', 'Yes', 'Dollman & Pritchard., Hayward Smith & Mackey., Ivor Gwynne Jones', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Higham, Higham v Higham The Administration of Estates Act 1925, s 51(2), retains the old law of intestacy in the case of land belonging before 1926 to a person who was of unsound mind when the new law of property came into force, and has not recovered testamentary capacity since that date. The decision here, however, creates a partial exception to that rule.', 'C M Young Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-26', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6108, 'Re Higham, Higham v Higham', '', '../links/cases/Re Higham.pdf', 'Yes', 'Dollman & Pritchard., Hayward Smith & Mackey., Ivor Gwynne Jones', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Higham, Higham v Higham The Administration of Estates Act 1925, s 51(2), retains the old law of intestacy in the case of land belonging before 1926 to a person who was of unsound mind when the new law of property came into force, and has not recovered testamentary capacity since that date. The decision here, however, creates a partial exception to that rule.', 'C M Young Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-02-26', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6109, 'Re Horlick’s Settlement Trusts, Colledge v Horlick', '', '../links/cases/Re Horlick.pdf', 'Yes', 'Markby Stewart & Wadesons., Baileys Shaw & Gillett', '1938', 'High Court', 'Re Horlick’s Settlement Trusts, Colledge v Horlick By a settlement made in consequence of a divorce, the settlor covenanted that he or his personal representatives would pay to trustees in trust to pay to his divorced wife annually “such sum as after deduction of income tax at the standard rate for the time being in force and of every other tax on income for the time being in force shall leave a clear sum of £4,000.â€', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-25', 'TRUST '),
(6110, 'Re Horlick’s Settlement Trusts, Colledge v Horlick', '', '../links/cases/Re Horlick.pdf', 'Yes', 'Markby Stewart & Wadesons., Baileys Shaw & Gillett', '1938', 'High Court', 'Re Horlick’s Settlement Trusts, Colledge v Horlick By a settlement made in consequence of a divorce, the settlor covenanted that he or his personal representatives would pay to trustees in trust to pay to his divorced wife annually “such sum as after deduction of income tax at the standard rate for the time being in force and of every other tax on income for the time being in force shall leave a clear sum of £4,000.â€', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-25', 'TRUST '),
(6111, 'Re Howell’s Trusts, Barclays Bank Ltd v Simmons', '', '../links/cases/Re Howell vrs simmon.pdf', 'Yes', 'H B Wedlake Saint & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Howell’s Trusts, Barclays Bank Ltd v Simmons By his will, made in October 1933, a testator gave “to every person who shall at the date of my death be in my service and shall have been in my service for not less than three years continuously immediately prior to that dateâ€ one year’s wages. The testator had carried on the business of a sports ground proprietor.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-15', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6112, 'Re Howell’s Trusts, Barclays Bank Ltd v Simmons', '', '../links/cases/Re Howell vrs simmon.pdf', 'Yes', 'H B Wedlake Saint & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Howell’s Trusts, Barclays Bank Ltd v Simmons By his will, made in October 1933, a testator gave “to every person who shall at the date of my death be in my service and shall have been in my service for not less than three years continuously immediately prior to that dateâ€ one year’s wages. The testator had carried on the business of a sports ground proprietor.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-15', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6113, 'Re J Franklin & Son Ltdc', '', '../links/cases/Re J Franklin.pdf', 'Yes', 'William Charles Crocker., R G Percival., Jacques Asquith and Jacques', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re J Franklin & Son Ltd L F owned the greater part of the shares of J F & Son Ltd. His wife was appointed director in his lifetime, and also in his lifetime one C C was appointed a director. The latter never took up his qualification shares, and, although he continued to act and was treated as a director, he in law ceased to be such in 1933. L F died in 1934, and his wife, being in bad health, then went to the South of France, it being expected that her stay there would be a temporary one, but in fact she never returned.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-04', 'COMPANY'),
(6114, 'Re J Franklin & Son Ltdc', '', '../links/cases/Re J Franklin.pdf', 'Yes', 'William Charles Crocker., R G Percival., Jacques Asquith and Jacques', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re J Franklin & Son Ltd L F owned the greater part of the shares of J F & Son Ltd. His wife was appointed director in his lifetime, and also in his lifetime one C C was appointed a director. The latter never took up his qualification shares, and, although he continued to act and was treated as a director, he in law ceased to be such in 1933. L F died in 1934, and his wife, being in bad health, then went to the South of France, it being expected that her stay there would be a temporary one, but in fact she never returned.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-04', 'COMPANY'),
(6115, 'Re Johnson & Johnson (Great Britain) Ltd’s Patent', '', '../links/cases/Re Johnson.pdf', 'Yes', 'R G Harrison., Cedric H Akaster', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Johnson & Johnson (Great Britain) Ltd’s Patent The respondents had applied to the comptroller, under the provisions of the Patents and Designs Acts 1907–1932, s 26, to revoke a patent which had been granted to the appellants, and which was entitled “Improvements in or relating to waterproof fabrics and the production thereof.â€', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-26', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(6116, 'Re Lady Mary Bowden', '', '../links/cases/Re Lady Mary Bowden.pdf', 'Yes', 'Herbert Oppenheimer Nathan Vandyk & Mackay., Maxwell Brownjohn Clark & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Lady Mary Bowden The bankrupt, a married woman, was entitled, under a post-nuptial settlement made by her husband, a man of considerable wealth, to an income of £5,000 per annum, free of tax, subject to a restraint upon anticipation, and, in the event of her becoming discovert, the £5,000 per annum was subject to a discretionary trust of which she was one of two objects.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-30', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(6117, 'Re Lady Mary Bowden', '', '../links/cases/Re Lady Mary Bowden.pdf', 'Yes', 'Herbert Oppenheimer Nathan Vandyk & Mackay., Maxwell Brownjohn Clark & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Lady Mary Bowden The bankrupt, a married woman, was entitled, under a post-nuptial settlement made by her husband, a man of considerable wealth, to an income of £5,000 per annum, free of tax, subject to a restraint upon anticipation, and, in the event of her becoming discovert, the £5,000 per annum was subject to a discretionary trust of which she was one of two objects.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-30', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(6118, 'Re Lawry’s Estate, Andrew v Coad', '', '../links/cases/Re Lawry.pdf', 'Yes', 'Church Adams Tatham & Co., Hedley Norris & Co., Peter & Gainsford', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Lawry’s Estate, Andrew v Coad  By his will a testator gave his residuary estate to his two sisters CL and AJL, equally “for their respective lives with full power to deal therewith as if it were their own and on the death of either of them or in the event of either or both of them predeceasing me then I give and bequeath her or their share or shares to W. B. A.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-30', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6119, 'Re Lawry’s Estate, Andrew v Coad', '', '../links/cases/Re Lawry.pdf', 'Yes', 'Church Adams Tatham & Co., Hedley Norris & Co., Peter & Gainsford', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Lawry’s Estate, Andrew v Coad  By his will a testator gave his residuary estate to his two sisters CL and AJL, equally “for their respective lives with full power to deal therewith as if it were their own and on the death of either of them or in the event of either or both of them predeceasing me then I give and bequeath her or their share or shares to W. B. A.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-30', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6120, '', '', '', 'Yes', '', '', 'Supreme', '', '', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', ''),
(6121, 'Re Legh’s Resettlement Trusts, Public Trustee v Legh', '', '../links/cases/Re Legh.pdf', 'Yes', 'Holloway Blount & Duke., Waller Mager & Cobbett., Robins Hay & Waters', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Legh’s Resettlement Trusts, Public Trustee v Legh In the exercise of a special power of appointment conferred upon him by a deed of 1891, a testator by his will appointed a sixth part of the settled funds upon the following trusts in favour of his two grandchildren: “upon trust during the joint lives [of the grandchildren] to pay the income thereof to them in equal shares as tenants in common and after the death of either of them to pay the whole of the income thereof to the survivor of them during the residue of his or her life.â€', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-30', 'TRUSTS'),
(6122, 'Re Legh’s Resettlement Trusts, Public Trustee v Legh', '', '../links/cases/Re Legh.pdf', 'Yes', 'Holloway Blount & Duke., Waller Mager & Cobbett., Robins Hay & Waters', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Legh’s Resettlement Trusts, Public Trustee v Legh In the exercise of a special power of appointment conferred upon him by a deed of 1891, a testator by his will appointed a sixth part of the settled funds upon the following trusts in favour of his two grandchildren: “upon trust during the joint lives [of the grandchildren] to pay the income thereof to them in equal shares as tenants in common and after the death of either of them to pay the whole of the income thereof to the survivor of them during the residue of his or her life.â€', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-30', 'TRUSTS'),
(6123, 'Re Lynch-White, Smith v Lynch-White', '', '../links/cases/Re Lynch vrs white lynch.pdf', 'Yes', 'Moon Gilks & Moon', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Lynch-White, Smith v Lynch-White By his will a testator declared that “all income arising from any part of my estate shall at all times be used and applied as income and no part thereof shall be added to capital and in particular all income received immediately subsequent to my death shall be treated wholly as income and shall not be apportioned.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-08', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6124, 'Re Marsland, Lloyds Bank Ltd v Marsland', '', '../links/cases/Re Marsland.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gregory Rowcliffe & Co., Huddersfield., Marchant Newington & Dommett', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Re Marsland, Lloyds Bank Ltd v Marsland A husband and wife entered into a separation deed on 30 May 1902, wherein the husband covenanted that he would not revoke nor alter a will which he had already made.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-04', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6125, 'Re Mill Lane Land, Everton, Re Liverpool Education', '', '../links/cases/Re Mill Lane Land.pdf', 'Yes', 'Vivian J Williams & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Mill Lane Land, Everton, Re Liverpool Education In 1872 a piece of land was conveyed to a vicar and churchwardens upon educational trusts, and, in accordance with the provisions of the School Grants Act 1855, the conveyance was subject to a condition that no sale should be valid unless either the consent of the Home Secretary were given or the grant (a grant of £736 towards the purchase money had been made out of public funds) were repaid to the Treasury.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-28', 'EDUCATION'),
(6126, 'Re Mill Lane Land, Everton, Re Liverpool Education', '', '../links/cases/Re Mill Lane Land.pdf', 'Yes', 'Vivian J Williams & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Mill Lane Land, Everton, Re Liverpool Education In 1872 a piece of land was conveyed to a vicar and churchwardens upon educational trusts, and, in accordance with the provisions of the School Grants Act 1855, the conveyance was subject to a condition that no sale should be valid unless either the consent of the Home Secretary were given or the grant (a grant of £736 towards the purchase money had been made out of public funds) were repaid to the Treasury.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-28', 'EDUCATION'),
(6127, 'Re Morley’s Estate, Hollenden v Morley', '', '../links/cases/Re Morley.pdf', 'Yes', 'Biddle Thorne Welsford & Gait., Morten Cutler & Co., Robins Hay & Waters', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Morley’s Estate, Hollenden v Morley A testator’s estate was mainly money invested in a partnership firm, and under the deed of partnership the purchase price of his share was payable by instalments. The testator by his will gave a very large number of legacies, some of which were settled legacies.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-04', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6128, 'Re Mortimers (London) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Mortimers.pdf', 'Yes', 'Stafford Clark & Co., Champion & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Mortimers (London) Ltd An extraordinary resolution was passed for the voluntary winding up of a limited company, and a liquidator was duly appointed, and his remuneration fixed by the members.', 'W K Scrivener Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-04', 'COMPANY'),
(6129, 'Re Muscovitch and Muscovitch', '', '../links/cases/Re Muscovitch and Muscovitch.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hancock & Willis., Newport., The Solicitor Board of Trade', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Re Muscovitch and Muscovitch On 21 October 1938, an order was made in the county court at Cardiff suspending the discharge of a bankrupt for a period. On 25 October, an appeal was entered in London, and a notice of appeal was sent to the solicitors at Newport and was received by them on 26 October.', 'F Honig Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-21', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(6130, 'Re Northcliffe’s Settlements', '', '../links/cases/Re Northcliffe.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ellis Peirs & Co., Russell & Arnholz', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Northcliffe’s Settlements There is no principle whatsoever that would prevent a bank from being appointed a trustee of a settlement merely because one or more of the beneficiaries are customers of the bank and, in fact, have overdrawn accounts with the bank.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-26', 'TRUSTS'),
(6131, 'Re Ossemsley Estates Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Ossemsley Estates Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Forsyte Kerman & Phillips., Taylor & Humbert', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Ossemsley Estates Ltd The real estate of a testator was by his will subjected to a yearly perpetual rentcharge of £300. Upon the sale of part of the land, thirty years before the present proceedings, part of the purchase money had been paid into court, and this money with certain securities formed a fund in court sufficient to provide for the annuity.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-12', 'LAND '),
(6132, 'Re Phillips, Public Trustee v Phillips', '', '../links/cases/Re Phillips.pdf', 'Yes', 'T A Needham & Son., Cobbett Wheeler & Cobbett', '1938', 'High Court', 'Re Phillips, Public Trustee v Phillips The testator left the residue of his estate as to one-third to a named person and as to the other two-thirds to his nephews and nieces living at his death.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-11', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6133, 'Re Pipe, Ledger v Mobbs', '', '../links/cases/Re Pipe vrs mobbs.pdf', 'Yes', 'H C L Hanne & Co., Treasury Solicitor., Sharpe Pritchard & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Pipe, Ledger v Mobbs The question that arises here is whether the court will construe the gift as one to the holder of the office for the time being or to the holder at a particular time, eg, at the death of the testatrix, at the date of the will or at the date of payment and transfer.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-30', 'CHARITIES'),
(6134, 'Re Sanger, Taylor v North', '', '../links/cases/Re Sanger.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wilkinson Howlett & Moorhouse., Taylor & Humbert', '1938', 'High Court', 'Re Sanger, Taylor v North The will of the testatrix, who died on 20 June 1936, after providing for the payment of certain pecuniary legacies, directed the executors to divide the proceeds of the estate equally among five legatees.', 'F Honig Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-17', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6135, 'Re Seymour, The Trustee v Barclays Bank Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Seymour vrs barclays bank ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Woolfe & Woolfe., Durrant Cooper & Hambling', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Seymour, The Trustee v Barclays Bank Ltd Early in 1936 S had a banking account at each of two branches of the respondent bank. The account at one of the branches had been dormant since October 1935, and stood in debit as an overdraft secured by a guarantee.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-09', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(6136, 'Re Sherwood Colliery Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Sherwood Colliery Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gregory Rowcliffe & Co., Baileys Shaw & Gillett., Thicknesse & Hull', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Re Sherwood Colliery Co Ltd The applicants applied for the right to work four seams of coal and for the right to let down the surface in the course of working and certain ancillary rights. The coal, which amounted to about 6,250,000 tons in freehold ownership and 9,000,000 tons in what was formerly copyhold ownership, was vested in such a number and variety of interests that it was impracticable to obtain the right to work it.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-20', 'INDUSTRY'),
(6137, 'Re Shuker’s Estate, Bromley v Reed', '', '../links/cases/Re Shuker.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Wellington, Shropshire., Ravenscroft Woodward & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Shuker’s Estate, Bromley v Reed A testator appointed his wife to be his sole executrix and trustee, and after her death his two nephews to be the executors and trustees of his will.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-17', 'TRUSTS'),
(6138, 'Ravenscroft Woodward & Co', '', '', 'Yes', 'Wedlake Letts & Birds., Johnson Weatherall Sturt & Hardy', '1937', 'High Court', 'Ravenscroft Woodward & Co The owner of certain property, in 1904, for a certain consideration, granted to the respondent council the right to enter upon part of the property for the purpose of searching for and taking water, to make a reservoir and to lay a pipe-line, with all necessary ancillary powers.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-01', 'TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING'),
(6139, 'Re Simeon', '', '../links/cases/Re Simeon.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wedlake Letts & Birds., Johnson Weatherall Sturt & Hardy', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Simeon The owner of certain property, in 1904, for a certain consideration, granted to the respondent council the right to enter upon part of the property for the purpose of searching for and taking water, to make a reservoir and to lay a pipe-line, with all necessary ancillary powers.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-01', 'TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING'),
(6140, 'Re Smith, Bilham v Smith', '', '../links/cases/Re Smith vrs smith.pdf', 'Yes', 'Henry P Spottiswoode & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Smith, Bilham v Smith A husband took out a policy of insurance on his own life for the benefit of his wife under the Married Women’s Property Act 1882.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-02', 'TRUSTS');
INSERT INTO `courtrulings` (`id`, `title`, `content`, `link`, `isshow`, `author`, `date`, `courttype`, `summary`, `presiding`, `casetype`, `subjectmatter`, `caseno`, `counsel1`, `counsel2`, `courtname`, `caseDate`, `subjectmattertitle`) VALUES
(6141, 'Re Spence’s Estate, Barclays Bank Ltd v Stockton-on-Tees Corporation', '', '../links/cases/Re Spence vrs stocton and tees ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gibson & Weldon., Stockton-on-Tees., Bell Brodrick & Gray', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Spence’s Estate, Barclays Bank Ltd v Stockton-on-Tees Corporation By his will a testator gave a collection of antiques to the defendant corporation subject to the condition that the corporation should deposit them in one of the rooms of a public hall, hereinafter referred to, where they were to be kept open to inspection by the public, subject to such reasonable restrictions and regulations as might be imposed by the corporation.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-19', 'CHARITIES'),
(6142, 'Re Strickland’s Estate, National Guarantee and Suretyship Association Ltd v Maidment', '', '../links/cases/Re Strickland vrs maidment.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lazarus Son & L A Hart., Samuel Tonkin Booth & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Strickland’s Estate, National Guarantee and Suretyship Association Ltd v Maidment The plaintiff issued a writ in the Chancery Division claiming an account and payment of all sums due to her under a contract entered into by the plaintiff with the defendant.', 'J MacGillivray Asher Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6143, 'Re Syston and Thurmaston Gas, Light and Coke Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Syston and Thurmaston Gas.pdf', 'Yes', 'Field Roscoe & Co., Leicester', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Re Syston and Thurmaston Gas, Light and Coke Co Ltd No provision was made in the memorandum or articles of a statutory company, which had a capital of £10,000, either for the distribution of surplus assets in the event of a winding up or for dividends, except that the directors could declare a dividend to the members in proportion to their shares.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-18', 'COMPANY'),
(6144, 'Re Talbot-Ponsonby’s Estate, Talbot-Ponsonby v Talbot-Ponsonby', '', '../links/cases/Re Talbot.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gregory Rowcliffe & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Talbot-Ponsonby’s Estate, Talbot-Ponsonby v Talbot-Ponsonby A testator by his will devised the L estate to his son upon condition that he made the same his home, and upon the further condition that he did not allow a named person to set foot upon the property', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-21', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6145, 'Re Taplin, Watson v Tate', '', '../links/cases/Re Taplin.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ridsdale & Son., F H Adams., E G Draper', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Taplin, Watson v Tate T B lived in Rockhampton from 1860–1870 with a certain lady; they held themselves out to be husband and wife, and they and their children were received in local society, which would not have been the case had there been any suggestion of irregularity.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-06', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6146, 'Re Taxation of Costs, Re TAM, A Solicitor', '', '../links/cases/Re Taxation of Costs.pdf', 'Yes', 'L Bingham & Co., T A Matthews', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Taxation of Costs, Re TAM, A Solicitor The plaintiff in a running-down action was insured against third party risks only. The defendant successfully counterclaimed for damage to his motor vehicle.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-07', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6147, 'Re The Application of the Société des Usines Chimiques Rhône-Poulenc.', '', '../links/cases/Re The Application of the Société des Usines Chimiques Rhône.pdf', 'Yes', 'Seaton Taylor & Co., G B & L Ellis', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re The Application of the Société des Usines Chimiques Rhône-Poulenc. The appellants were the registered owners of the trade mark “Livron.â€ They had in fact made this word up from the words “liverâ€ and “iron.â€ There is, however, and was at the date of registration, a town in France called Livron.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-15', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(6148, 'Re Turkington, Owen v Benson', '', '../links/cases/Re Turkington.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gregory Rowcliffe & Co., F W Davy., Miller & Smiths', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Turkington, Owen v Benson A gift to the members of an association which can be disposed of by them as they shall decide is a gift which is not subject to the rule against perpetuities. The gift in the present case being decided to be such a gift, the question whether or not it was a charitable gift does not arise.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-19', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6149, 'Re Vardon, Brown v Vardon', '', '../links/cases/Re Vardon.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wordsworth Marr Johnson & Shaw., Gibson & Weldon., Bristo', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Re Vardon, Brown v Vardon A testator by his will made the following gifts: a specific devise, a pecuniary legacy, certain specific bequests of chattels, an annuity to his widow, and certain dispositions which were held to be inoperative. The result was that the executors were left with approximately £9,000 out of which to provide the annuity, the residue going as on an intestacy. The income of that sum was clearly insufficient to provide the annuity.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-07-28', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6150, 'Re Vaux, Nicholson v Vaux', '', '../links/cases/Re Vaux.pdf', 'Yes', 'Patersons Snow & Co', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Re Vaux, Nicholson v Vaux The testator by his will gave the income of his residuary estate unto his widow until death or re-marriage, and after her re-marriage he gave her an annuity of £500 per annum.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-11', 'TRUSTS'),
(6151, 'Re Waterhouse’s Policy', '', '../links/cases/Re Waterhouse.pdf', 'Yes', 'Freshfields Leese & Munns., Walters & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Waterhouse’s Policy W assigned to a bank, to secure an overdraft, an insurance policy for £500, payable either on his death or on his attaining the age of 60.', 'C M Young Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-02', 'INSURANCE'),
(6152, 'Re Waxed Papers Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re Waxed Papers Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Leonard Tubbs & Co., Nordon & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Waxed Papers Ltd At a meeting to consider a scheme of arrangement a number of shareholders had appointed proxies “to act for me at the meeting … for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, approving, with or without modification, the proposed scheme of arrangement … and at such meeting or at any adjournment thereof to vote for me and in my nameâ€ either for or against the scheme.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-02', 'COMPANY'),
(6153, 'Re William Porter & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Re William Porter.pdf', 'Yes', 'Whitehouse Gibson & Oldershaw., Hyman Isaacs Lewis & Mills', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re William Porter & Co Ltd F was the governing director of a limited company. In February 1934, at F’s suggestion, a resolution was passed by the directors that no fees should be paid to the directors from 1 October 1933, until it should be resolved otherwise.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-17', 'COMPANY'),
(6154, 'Re Wilson, Wilson v Bland', '', '../links/cases/Re Wilson vrs bland.pdf', 'Yes', 'Warren & Warren., Le Brasseur & Oakley', '1937', 'High Court', 'Re Wilson, Wilson v Bland This case was mentioned on minutes of order, and the court held that the proper order was for a declaration in the terms of that asked for in the motion and which is set out in the opening passage of the judgment of the court delivered by Luxmoore J. The declaration omitted any mention of interest on the debt of £4,200, as all claim to interest had been abandoned by the claimant during the proceedings. The order was to be dated 19 July 1937.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-19', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6155, 'Re Winterstoke’s Will Trusts, Gunn v Richardson', '', '../links/cases/Re Winterstoke.pdf', 'Yes', 'Rider Heaton Meredith & Mills., Vassall Abbott & Co.,Gregory Rowcliffe & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Re Winterstoke’s Will Trusts, Gunn v Richardson A testator by his will settled his residuary estate upon trust to pay the income thereof to two ladies during their lives and subject thereto the residue was given to various ascertained persons in certain proportions. One of the tenants for life having died, in order to pay the death duties then payable, the trustees sold certain securities.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-14', 'SUCCESSION'),
(6156, 'Read v Croydon Corporation', '', '../links/cases/Read v Croydon Corporation.pdf', 'Yes', 'E Royalton Kisch., Sharpe Pritchard & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Read v Croydon Corporation The defendant corporation owned and maintained two water wells, the Addington and Stroud Green wells, for the purpose of supplying water to residents of the borough. The adult plaintiff was a ratepayer in the said borough, and the infant plaintiff, his daughter, resided with him in the house in respect of which he paid the water rate.', 'F Honig Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-02', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(6157, 'Rentit Ltd v Duffield', '', '../links/cases/Rentit Ltd v Duffield.pdf', 'Yes', 'H Flint & Co., Reid Sharman & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Rentit Ltd v Duffield The respondent company took proceedings to recover certain instalments, amounting to about £6, due under a hire-purchase agreement. In the ordinary course, and under the County Courts (Amendment) Act 1934, s 19, the case came before the registrar. The respondent company was represented and was admittedly a consenting party; the appellant was not represented, but he wrote to the registrar alleging that the contract had been obtained by fraud.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-24', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6158, 'A R Dennis & Co Ltd v Campbell', '', '../links/cases/A R Dennis & Co Ltd v Campbell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Howard, Kennedy & Rossi., Oughtred & Co, Edgware', '1976', 'Appeal', 'A R Dennis & Co Ltd v Campbell The plaintiffs employed the defendant as manager of one of their betting shops. Contrary to the\r\nplaintiffs’ rules, and without authority, the defendant accepted credit bets from a customer totalling\r\n£1,000.', 'Janet Harding Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-03-29', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(6159, 'A R Dennis & Co Ltd v Campbell', '', '../links/cases/A R Dennis & Co Ltd v Campbell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Howard, Kennedy & Rossi., Oughtred & Co, Edgware', '1976', 'Appeal', 'A R Dennis & Co Ltd v Campbell The plaintiffs employed the defendant as manager of one of their betting shops. Contrary to the\r\nplaintiffs’ rules, and without authority, the defendant accepted credit bets from a customer totalling\r\n£1,000.', 'Janet Harding Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-03-29', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(6160, 'Rhokana Corporation Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Rhokana Corporation Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Solicitor of Inland Revenue., Holmes Son & Pott', '1937', 'High Court', 'Rhokana Corporation Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners A company issued certain debentures secured by a trust deed, which provided, inter alia, that interest declared at sterling rates should be paid in sterling at the company’s bankers in London, or at certain offices in New York in USA dollars at the fixed rate of exchange of 4.86 dollars to the £, or at certain offices in Amsterdam, in Dutch florins at the fixed rate of exchange of 12.11 Dutch florins to the £. The deed further provided that interest on registered debentures would be paid by cheque or warrant on the company’s bankers sent through the post.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-04', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6161, 'Amies v Inner London Education Authority', '', '../links/cases/Amies v Inner London Education Authority.pdf', 'Yes', 'Howard, Kennedy & Rossi., Oughtred & Co, Edgware', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Amies v Inner London Education Authority In 1971 Mrs A was appointed by a local education authority as deputy head of a school art department.\r\nIn 1975 she applied for the post of head of the department but, on 13 October 1975, a man was\r\nappointed to that post.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-02', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6162, 'Amies v Inner London Education Authority', '', '../links/cases/Amies v Inner London Education Authority.pdf', 'Yes', 'Howard, Kennedy & Rossi., Oughtred & Co, Edgware', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Amies v Inner London Education Authority In 1971 Mrs A was appointed by a local education authority as deputy head of a school art department.\r\nIn 1975 she applied for the post of head of the department but, on 13 October 1975, a man was\r\nappointed to that post.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-02', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6163, 'Ritz Cleaners Ltd v West Middlesex Assessment Committee', '', '../links/cases/Ritz Cleaners Ltd v West Middlesex Assessment Committee.pdf', 'Yes', 'H G Greenwood., Ellis & Fairbairn', '1937', 'High Court', 'Ritz Cleaners Ltd v West Middlesex Assessment Committee The respondent company used certain premises for cleaning and repairing garments left for cleaning, and, to a very small extent, for dyeing. Articles for cleaning were brought to the premises by customers and the respondent company’s vanman, who collected them from two receiving-offices, from an agency, and from customers’ houses, in response to orders received.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-22', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6164, 'Roast v Roast', '', '../links/cases/Roast v Roast.pdf', 'Yes', 'Edward Fail., C V Young & Cowper', '1937', 'High Court', 'Roast v Roast A wife had for some time before August 1936, been living apart from her husband. About that time she returned to him, the date of such return being stated by the wife to be 28 August, and by the husband to be 18 September.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-04', 'FAMILY'),
(6165, 'Ansah v Ansah', '', '../links/cases/Ansah v Ansah.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wells & Coggins., Foster., Camberley', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Ansah v Ansah The parties were married in 1973 and had two children. The marriage was stormy. The wife finally left\r\nthe husband on 7 April 1976.', 'L I Zysman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-13', 'FAMILY'),
(6166, 'Robinson Brothers (Brewers) Ltd v Houghton and Chester-le-Street Assessment Committee', '', '../links/cases/Robinson Brothers.pdf', 'Yes', 'Richardson Sadler & Co., Godden Holme & Ward', '1937', 'High Court', 'Robinson Brothers (Brewers) Ltd v Houghton and Chester-le-Street Assessment Committee A firm of brewers, following the usual custom at the present time instead of letting a public house to a tenant, put a manager in charge of it. The house was in effect a tied house, and it was admitted that brewers were prepared to pay a higher rent for houses in which a manager could be placed in this way.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-23', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6167, 'Aries Tanker Corporation v Total Transport Ltd', '', '', 'Yes', '', '1977', 'Supreme', 'Aries Tanker Corporation v Total Transport Ltd By a voyage charterparty, expressed to be governed by English law, the owners’ vessel was chartered for\r\nthe carriage of a cargo of goods to Rotterdam.', '', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-01-27', 'SHIPIN'),
(6168, 'Ronald Bampton & Partners v D Garner & Sons Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Ronald Bampton vrs d garner n sons.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lionel Lazarus & Leighton., Warmingtons', '1937', 'High Court', 'Ronald Bampton & Partners v D Garner & Sons Ltd An agent for the sale of 3 shops in course of erection by builders secured an agreement for the purchase of the same upon certain terms agreed to by the builders who were in fact the vendors. When the agreement was mentioned to the solicitor for the persons financing the builders, he refused to allow the sale to go on, upon the ground that it was completely one-sided and too advantageous to the buyer. The builders then refused to go on with the sale and the agent sued for his commission.', 'Gerald Abrahams Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-27', 'LAND '),
(6169, 'Aries Tanker Corporation v Total Transport Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Aries Tanker Corporation v Total Transport Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Denton, Hall & Burgin., Coward Chance', '1977', 'Appeal', 'Aries Tanker Corporation v Total Transport Ltd  By a voyage charterparty, expressed to be governed by English law, the owners’ vessel was chartered for\r\nthe carriage of a cargo of goods to Rotterdam.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-01-27', 'SHIPPING'),
(6170, 'Armadora Occidental SA v Horace Mann Insurance Company', '', '../links/cases/Armadora Occidental SA v Horace Mann Insurance Company.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ince & Co', '1976', 'High Court', 'Armadora Occidental SA v Horace Mann Insurance Company The defendants, a company incorporated in the United States and resident there, were part insurers of\r\nthe plaintiffs’ vessels against loss. The rest of the cover was provided by various insurers including\r\nLloyd’s and other London insurers.', 'K Mydeen Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-18', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6171, 'Rowell v Pratt', '', '../links/cases/Rowell v Pratt.pdf', 'Yes', 'Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar., Burton Yeates & Hart', '1937', 'High Court', 'Rowell v Pratt The appellant brought an action against the respondent to recover the price of certain potatoes sold and delivered to the respondent. The respondent counterclaimed damages, on the ground that the appellant had agreed to grow 9½ acres of royal kidney potatoes, and to deliver the whole crop to the respondent at a fixed price, but that, in breach of his contract, the appellant had not delivered to the respondent the whole product of the 9½ acres, but had wrongfully sold part thereof to other buyers, at a price higher than that at which he had contracted to sell to the respondent.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-26', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6172, 'Arnold v Dodd and others', '', '../links/cases/Arnold v Dodd and others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Stollard & Limbrey., Kent & Hodges., Littlehampton., James Weeks', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Arnold v Dodd and others Under the Commons Registration Act 1965 the whole of Yateley Common was registered as common\r\nland. The common was divided into four parts of which one was the ‘Blackbushe part’.', 'Jacqueline Metcalfe Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-06', 'LAND'),
(6173, 'Savage v Nightingale', '', '../links/cases/Savage v Nightingale.pdf', 'Yes', 'C Howe Browne., Ponsford & Devenish', '1937', 'High Court', 'Savage v Nightingale From June 1935, the appellant was working for H K & F Ltd. In March 1936, he developed a rash, but continued in that employment at full wages until 2 May, when he began to work for the respondent. He worked for the respondent until 9 May, when he felt too ill to continue.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-04-30', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6174, 'Arsenal Football Club Ltd and another v Ende', '', '../links/cases/Arsenal Football Club Ltd and another v Ende.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lawrence Jones & Co', '1976', 'High Court', 'Arsenal Football Club Ltd and another v Ende The appellant was a ratepayer who lived in the London Borough of Hackney. He was also the managing\r\nagent of a house in the London Borough of Islington which was in multiple occupation.', 'G Gore-Andrews Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-07-30', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(6175, 'Scheff v Columbia Pictures Corporation Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Scheff v Columbia Pictures Corporation Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'H S Wright & Webb., Oscar Mason Co', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Scheff v Columbia Pictures Corporation Ltd The plaintiff complained that the defendants had infringed the copyright in a book he had written. Correspondence took place between the parties from 12 October 1937, up to 8 November 1937, on which date the defendants gave an undertaking to keep accounts, on the understanding that the plaintiff would not ask for an injunction.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-04', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6176, 'Arsenal Football Club Ltd v Smith (Valuation Officer) and another', '', '../links/cases/Arsenal Football Club Ltd v Smith.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lawrence Jones & Co', '1977', 'High Court', 'Arsenal Football Club Ltd v Smith (Valuation Officer) and another       E lived in a flat in the London Borough of Hackney and was liable to the rates in respect of the flat. He\r\nwas also the managing agent of a house in the London Borough of Islington which was in multiple\r\noccupation, in the sense that it had been divided into four dwellings for separate occupation.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '0000-00-00', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(6177, 'Bale v Rosier', '', '../links/cases/Bale v Rosier.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe, Pritchard & Co., J V Bates, Norwich', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Bale v Rosier On two occasions the defendant obtained board and lodgings from two landladies without paying for\r\nthem. Two charges were preferred against him, each alleging that contrary to s 16(1)a of the Theft Act\r\n1968 he had, by deception, dishonestly obtained for himself a pecuniary advantage, namely ‘the evasion\r\nor deferment of a debt’ of a specified sum for board and lodging from, in each case, a named landlady\r\nfor which he was liable.', 'Jacqueline Metcalfe Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-02', 'CRIMINAL'),
(6178, 'Scindia Steamships (London) Ltd v London Assurance', '', '../links/cases/Scindia Steamships.pdf', 'Yes', 'Holman Fenwick & Willan., Thomas Cooper & Co', '1936', 'High Court', 'Scindia Steamships (London) Ltd v London Assurance The owners of a ship took out a Lloyd’s policy of insurance which contained a clause, known as the Inchmaree clause, in the following terms: “This insurance also specially to cover (subject to the free of average warranty) loss of or damage to hull or machinery directly caused by accidents in loading, discharging, or handling cargo, or in bunkering or in taking in fuel, or caused through the negligence of master, mariners, engineers or pilots, or through explosions, bursting of boilers, breakage of shafts, or through any latent defect in the machinery or hull.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1936-12-16', 'SHIPPING'),
(6179, 'Balen v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Balen v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Tarlo, Lyons & Aukin', '1976', 'High Court', 'Balen v Inland Revenue Commissioners In April 1974 the Inland Revenue Commissioners, acting under s 460(6)a of the Income and Corporation\r\nTaxes Act 1970, notified the plaintiff that they had reason to believe that s 460 might apply to him in\r\nrespect of certain transactions in securities specified in the notification.', 'Evelyn Budd Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-11', 'TAXATION'),
(6180, 'Barclays Bank International Ltd v Levin Bros (Bradford) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Barclays Bank International Ltd v Levin Bros (Bradford) Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kaufman, Kramer & Shebson., Victor D Zermansky & Co, Leeds', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Barclays Bank International Ltd v Levin Bros (Bradford) Ltd In 1975 G Co, a New York corporation, sold cloth to the defendants, who carried on business in\r\nBradford. On 25 April 1975 G Co drew four bills of exchange on the defendants, each for US $23,000,\r\nwhich were payable on 21 June, 5 July, 19 July and 2 August 1975.', 'H S Narulla Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-07-12', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6181, 'Scophony Ltd v Traub and Others', '', '../links/cases/Scophony Ltd v Traub and Others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Albert Fletcher & Co., Hill Dickinson & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Scophony Ltd v Traub and Others The manager of the defendant companies endeavoured by dishonest means to procure for his companies information to which they had no right whatever.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-29', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6182, 'Bickel and others v Duke of Westminster and others', '', '../links/cases/Bickel and others v Duke of Westminster and others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Boodle Hatfield & Co., Whittington, Tilling & Knight', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Bickel and others v Duke of Westminster and others A body of trustees were the lessees of several houses on a large estate. The leases, which had been\r\ngranted in 1947, were long leases at low rents within the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, but the lessees\r\nheld them only as investments and did not occupy any of the houses.', 'Wendy Shockett Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-07-08', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(6183, 'Biggin and another v Minton', '', '../links/cases/Biggin and another v Minton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Furley, Page, Fielding & Pembrook', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Biggin and another v Minton The vendors of property obtained against the purchaser an order for specific performance of the\r\ncontract of sale. The purchaser failed to carry out the order for specific performance and the vendors\r\napplied for an order that in lieu of specific performance they were entitled to damages under the\r\njurisdiction conferred by s 2a of the Chancery Amendment Act 1858.', 'Jacqueline Metcalfe Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-26', 'LAND'),
(6184, 'Shacklock v Ethorpe Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Shacklock v Ethorpe Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Vickress & Clare., Berrymans', '1937', 'High Court', 'Shacklock v Ethorpe Ltd An innkeeper is required by the Innkeepers’ Liability Act 1863, s 3, to exhibit a copy of s 1 thereof in a conspicuous part of the hall or entrance to the inn.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-29', 'LEISURE AND LICENSING'),
(6185, 'Biggs v Biggs and Wheatley', '', '../links/cases/Biggs v Biggs and Wheatley.pdf', 'Yes', 'Armstrong & Co', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Biggs v Biggs and Wheatley The husband and the wife married in 1959. In January 1972, the husband was convicted of assault on a\r\nthird party and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. In January 1973 the wife petitioned for divorce\r\nunder s 1(2)(a)a of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, alleging that the husband had committed adultery.\r\nA decree nisi was pronounced in October 1973.', 'Georgina Chambers Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-01-29', 'FAMILY'),
(6186, 'Blue Circle Staff Association v Certification Officer', '', '../links/cases/Blue Circle Staff Association v Certification Officer.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lawrence Jones & Co', '1976', 'High Court', 'Blue Circle Staff Association v Certification Officer In 1971 the salaried staff, numbering about 4,000 employees, of a group of companies (‘the employers’)\r\nformed with the employers’ assistance a staff consultative organisation (‘the association’). The function\r\nof the association was to provide the employers with a body which it could consult on staff matters and\r\ncould inform on matters affecting the group.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-02', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6187, 'Shenton v Tyler', '', '../links/cases/Shenton v Tyler.pdf', 'Yes', 'John B Borer., Robinson & Bradley', '1938', 'High Court', 'Shenton v Tyler The plaintiff sought to administer certain interrogatories to the defendant in order to establish that the defendant’s late husband had created a secret trust in her, the plaintiff''s, favour.', 'F Honig Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-22', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6188, 'BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt', '', '../links/cases/BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt.pdf', 'Yes', 'Franks, Charlesley & Co., Linklaters & Paines', '1975', 'Supreme', 'BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt The defendant was granted a concession by the Libyan government for the search and exploitation of\r\noil. In June 1960 he concluded an agreement, signed in London, with the plaintiffs, a company registered\r\nin England, with the consent of the Libyan authorities, for the development and joint exploitation of that\r\nconcession, which entitled the plaintiffs to one-half of the beneficial interest.', 'Sumra Green Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1975-11-04', 'CONTRACT'),
(6189, 'Brintons Ltd v Wyre Forest District Council', '', '../links/cases/Brintons Ltd v Wyre Forest District Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wedlake, Bell & Co., Sharpe Pritchard & Co', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Brintons Ltd v Wyre Forest District Council The plaintiffs withheld rates of £83,000 properly demanded in respect of office premises. On the rating\r\nauthority’s application, justices issued a distress warrant in respect of the rates. On the same day the\r\nbailiff went to the plaintiffs’ premises to levy distress.', 'Christine Ivamy Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-04-12', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(6190, 'Shipman v Shipman', '', '../links/cases/Shipman v Shipman.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bell Brodrick & Gray., Burton Yeates & Hart', '1938', 'High Court', 'Shipman v Shipman The respondent wife was first certified on 31 July 1915, and remained continuously in the asylum until 3 October 1923, when she was provisionally released on trial until further order or relapse.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-09', 'FAMILY'),
(6191, 'Bristol Channel Ship Repairers Ltd v O’Keefe and others', '', '../links/cases/Bristol Channel Ship Repairers Ltd v O.pdf', 'Yes', 'Le Brasseur, Davis and Son, Newport., Pattinson and Brewer', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Bristol Channel Ship Repairers Ltd v O’Keefe and others Because of lack of work it became necessary for the employers to dismiss 35 employees. Thirteen of\r\nthose employees (‘the applicants’) claimed that they had been unfairly dismissed and applied to an\r\nindustrial tribunal for compensation.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-15', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6192, 'British Airports Authority v Customs and Excise Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/British Airports Authority v Customs and Excise Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'M W T Nott', '1976', 'Supreme', 'British Airports Authority v Customs and Excise Commissioners The authority was responsible for the administration of an airport. One of its duties was to provide\r\nshops at the airport. The authority entered into an agreement with a firm (‘Hills’) whereby (cl 1) Hills\r\nwere granted the right to display and sell merchandise of a quality approved by the authority at shop\r\npremises in the airport.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-04', 'TAXATION'),
(6193, 'Cadogan v Cadogan', '', '../links/cases/Cadogan v Cadogan.pdf', 'Yes', 'Gwyn James & Co, Lydney, Gloucestershire., Mayo & Perkins, Eastbourne', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Cadogan v Cadogan In 1947 the plaintiff and her husband purchased a property as their matrimonial home. The property\r\nwas conveyed into the husband’s sole name although the plaintiff had contributed toward the purchase\r\nprice.', 'Jacqueline Metcalfe Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-06-21', 'LAND'),
(6194, 'Simons v Simons', '', '../links/cases/Simons v Simons.pdf', 'Yes', 'Torr & Co., Attenboroughs', '1938', 'High Court', 'Simons v Simons The plaintiff and her husband and their four children lived in Cornwall until 1912, when the husband went to Boston, USA, leaving the wife and children in this country. He returned to England in 1914, but went to America again in 1916.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-09', 'CONFLICT OF LAWS '),
(6195, 'Campbell v Campbell', '', '../links/cases/Campbell v Campbell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Donald, Darlington and Nice., Curwen, Jessopp and James', '1976', 'High Court', 'Campbell v Campbell In 1961 C, who was aged 17, began committing adultery with Mrs H, a married woman aged 30 with\r\neight children, most of whom were in care. C then went to live with Mrs H whose husband was away\r\nfrom home for considerable periods.', 'Georgina Chambers Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-01-23', 'FAMILY'),
(6196, 'Sitwell v Sun Engraving Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Sitwell v Sun Engraving Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Frere Cholmeley & Co., Rhys Roberts & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Sitwell v Sun Engraving Co Ltd The plaintiff sued a printing and publishing company for infringement of copyright by printing six stanzas of a poem of which he was the author.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-15', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6197, 'Campden Hill Towers Ltd and another v Gardner and another', '', '../links/cases/Campden Hill Towers Ltd and another v Gardner and another.pdf', 'Yes', 'Thornton, Lynne & Lawson., Allen & Son', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Campden Hill Towers Ltd and another v Gardner and another what had been included in the demise; ‘the exterior’ of the flat therefore included the outside walls of\r\nthe flat (although they had been excluded from the demise), the outside of the inner party walls of the\r\nflat, the outer sides of horizontal divisions between the demised flat and the flats above and below it,\r\nand the structural framework and beams which directly supported the floors, ceiling and walls of the flat', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-24', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(6198, 'Smith Hogg & Co Ltd v Black Sea & Baltic General Insurance Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Smith Hogg.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sinclair Roche & Temperley., Ince Roscoe Wilson & Glover', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Smith Hogg & Co Ltd v Black Sea & Baltic General Insurance Co Ltd The plaintiffs were the owners of a ship chartered to go to Soroka and load timber and carry it to Garston.', 'Maurice Share Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-08', 'SHIPPING'),
(6199, 'Capper Pass Ltd v Lawton', '', '../links/cases/Capper Pass Ltd v Lawton.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pattinson & Brewer., J S Bradley', '1976', 'High Court', 'Capper Pass Ltd v Lawton Mrs L was employed as a cook. She worked in a kitchen from which the directors of the company by\r\nwhom she was employed, and their guests, were served. She was the only cook in that kitchen, which\r\nwas of a semi-domestic sort, and she had to provide lunch for between ten and 20 persons a day.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-19', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6200, 'Smith v Birkenhead Corporation', '', '../links/cases/Smith v Birkenhead Corporation.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bartley Cocks & Bird., F Venn & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Smith v Birkenhead Corporation By the Birkenhead Improvement Act 1884, Sched II, it is provided that, when certain works for the improvement of private streets are undertaken by the corporation, the estimated expenses of executing the works shall be provisionally apportioned among the premises fronting or adjoining or abutting on such street, and that the provisional apportionment “shall also state whether the apportionment is made according to the frontage of the respective premises, or not, and the measurements of the frontages and the other considerations (if any) on which the apportionment is based.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-14', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(6201, 'China National Foreign Trade Transportation Corporation v Evlogia Shipping Co Sa of Panama', '', '../links/cases/China National Foreign Trade Transportation.pdf', 'Yes', 'Richards, Butler & Co., Holman, Fenwick and Willau', '1976', 'Appeal', 'China National Foreign Trade Transportation Corporation v Evlogia Shipping Co Sa of Panama By a Baltime form charterparty the charterers hired a vessel for a period of eight to ten months. Clause 6\r\nof the charterparty provided that the owners had the right to withdraw the vessel from the service of\r\nthe charterers in ‘default of payment’.', 'H S Narulla Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-07-02', 'CONTRACT'),
(6202, 'Clyde & Co v The Secretary of State for the Environment and another', '', '../links/cases/Clyde.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wedlake, Bell', '1976', 'Commercial Cour', 'Clyde & Co v The Secretary of State for the Environment and another In 1972 the local planning authority granted permission for the erection of a building in Guildford. Under\r\nthe permission the building was to comprise, in the western half, offices and, in the eastern half, eight\r\nflats with garages.', 'K Mydeen Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-19', 'TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING'),
(6203, 'Smith v Pearl Assurance Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Smith v Pearl Assurance Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pennington & Son., Berrymans', '1939', 'High Court', 'Smith v Pearl Assurance Co Ltd The plaintiff was injured in a motor car accident owing to the negligence of B, and recovered judgment against him.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1939-01-11', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6204, 'South Suburban Co-operative Society Ltd v Orum and Croydon Advertiser Ltd', '', '../links/cases/South Suburban Co.pdf', 'Yes', 'Shaen Roscoe Massey & Co., Haslewood Hare & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'South Suburban Co-operative Society Ltd v Orum and Croydon Advertiser Ltd In the absence of special circumstances, a newspaper will not be forced to discover the names of its informants, but the rule cannot be extended to the contributors to newspapers, who must answer an interrogatory directed to elicit such information. Such interrogatories are, of course, relevant upon the question of malice.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-31', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6205, 'Commercial Union Assurance Co Ltd v Hayden', '', '../links/cases/Commercial Union Assurance Co Ltd v Hayden.pdf', 'Yes', 'Herbert Smith & Co., Reynolds, Porter Chamberlain & Co', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Commercial Union Assurance Co Ltd v Hayden The plaintiffs, Commercial Union Assurance Co Ltd (‘Commercial Union’) appealed against a judgment of\r\nDonaldson J, given in the Commercial Court on 28 July 1975, dismissing their action against the\r\ndefendant, Mr Nicholas Charles Hayden who was sued on behalf of himself and as representing all the\r\nunderwriters subscribing to a public liability insurance policy issued by Lloyd’s. Both parties had insured\r\nagainst the same risk.', 'A S Virdi Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-22', 'INSURANCE'),
(6206, 'Spence v Spence', '', '../links/cases/Spence v Spence.pdf', 'Yes', 'Preston Lane—Claypon & O’Kelly., Arthur Benjamin & Cohen', '1938', 'High Court', 'Spence v Spence The parties were married for the first time in July 1913, the wife being then under 21 years of age and 28 years younger than her husband.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-12-19', 'FAMILY'),
(6207, 'Spilsbury (Inspector of Taxes) v Spofforth', '', '../links/cases/Spilsbury.pdf', 'Yes', 'Solicitor of Inland Revenue., Winter & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Spilsbury (Inspector of Taxes) v Spofforth The respondent obtained a decree absolute of divorce and an order for the payment of maintenance free of tax. At the end of the tax year she obtained a certificate that tax had been deducted and claimed repayment of the tax.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-15', 'FAMILY'),
(6208, 'Spittle v Thames Grit & Aggregates Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Spittle v Thames Grit.pdf', 'Yes', 'Treasury Solicitor., William Charles Crocker', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Spittle v Thames Grit & Aggregates Ltd The respondents, as holders of a private “Câ€ carrier’s licence, were charged with having failed to comply with a condition attached to the licence, namely, that “the holder of this licence is entitled to use the authorised vehicles for the carriage of goods for or in connection with any trade or business carried on by him, but no vehicle which is for the time being an authorised vehicle shall be used for the carriage of goods for hire or reward,â€ contrary to the Road and Rail Traffic Act 1933, s 9(1).', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-20', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6209, 'Srimati Premila Devi v Peoples Bank of Northern India Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Srimati Premila Devi v Peoples Bank of Northern India Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hy S L Polak & Co., Cardew Smith & Ross', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Srimati Premila Devi v Peoples Bank of Northern India Ltd The respondent bank was incorporated in 1925 with a capital of 50 lacs of rupees divided into 50,000 shares of Rs100 each.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-10-17', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(6210, 'Covell Matthews & Partners v French Wools Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Covell Matthews.pdf', 'Yes', 'May, May & Merrimans., Theodore Goddard & Co', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Covell Matthews & Partners v French Wools Ltd On 13 March 1973 the tenants issued an originating summons applying for an order for the grant of a\r\nnew tenancy of business premises under s 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. Negotiations\r\nbetween the parties as to the terms and conditions of the new tenancy took place and the hearing of\r\nthe originating summons was postponed from time to time.', 'Evelyn M C Budd Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-01', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(6211, 'St Pierre and Others v South American Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd and Chilean Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/St Pierre and Others v South American Stores.pdf', 'Yes', 'Vizard Oldham Crowder & Cash., Berrymans', '1937', 'Supreme', 'St Pierre and Others v South American Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd and Chilean Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd The plaintiffs, successors of the owner of premises in Santiago de Chile, by a lease executed at the Chilean consulate in Paris and drawn in the Spanish language, let the premises to the Chilean Stores for a term of 10 years from 1935, at a rental of 93,500 pesos of 183,057 millionths of a gramme of fine gold monthly, to be paid at the option of the owner either in Santiago de Chile or remitted to Europe, according to the instructions which the owner might give, one month in advance on the first working day of each month.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-17', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(6212, 'Cummings v Granger', '', '../links/cases/Cummings v Granger (sued as Grainger).pdf', 'Yes', 'Lewis Silkin & Partners., Alton Batchelor', '1976', 'District Court', 'Cummings v Granger The defendant occupied a yard in the East End of London which he used for storing scrap metal sold to\r\ncustomers who came to the yard. The yard was surrounded by high walls and a fence in which there\r\nwere two gates.', 'Wendy Shockett Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-05-26', 'ANIMAL'),
(6213, 'Currie and Co v The Law Society', '', '../links/cases/Currie and Co v The Law Society.pdf', 'Yes', 'Currie & Co, Wolverhampton., Hempsons', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Currie and Co v The Law Society In June 1970 the wife was granted a civil aid certificate to take proceedings against the husband in\r\nrespect of the former matrimonial home and other property. The plaintiffs were the husband’s\r\nsolicitors.', 'H Singh Narulla Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-03-22', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6214, 'Customs and Excise Commissioners v Tan and another', '', '../links/cases/Customs and Excise Commissioners v Tan and another.pdf', 'Yes', 'David Lee & Co., G Krikorian', '1977', 'High Court', 'Customs and Excise Commissioners v Tan and another In April 1972 T and her husband purchased in China two jade pendants for the total sum of £8,300. In\r\nMay T arrived at London (Heathrow) Airport where she declared the pendants to a customs officer. The\r\nofficer asked her what the pendants were worth; she replied that she did not know.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-01-27', 'TAXATION'),
(6215, 'Stepney Corporation v Osofsky', '', '../links/cases/Stepney Corporation v Osofsky.pdf', 'Yes', 'T Myrddin Baker., Stewart-Wallace & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Stepney Corporation v Osofsky On 17 September 1935, a certain sum was owing by the respondent, a licensed street trader, to the appellant corporation, in respect of removal of refuse and other services. During the period from 18 September 1935 to 17 March 1936, further sums became due for similar services, and, during the same period, certain payments were made by the respondent to the appellant corporation. The respondent did not specifically appropriate any of these payments to any particular charges.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-08', 'CONTRACT'),
(6216, 'Stockwell v Southgate Corporation', '', '../links/cases/Stockwell v Southgate Corporation.pdf', 'Yes', 'Beveridge & Co., Golding Hargrove & Golding', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Stockwell v Southgate Corporation The Coal Mines Act 1911, s 2(4) prohibits mine-owners from taking any part in the technical management of the mine unless they have the requisite technical knowledge which will qualify them to be managers. The duty of mine-owners to secure a proper system of working the mine is not thereby reduced to the mere duty to appoint a properly qualified manager.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-14', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6217, 'Strood Estates Co Ltd v Gregory', '', '../links/cases/Strood Estates Co Ltd v Gregory.pdf', 'Yes', 'Simon Haynes Barlas & Ireland., W H Thompson', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Strood Estates Co Ltd v Gregory A landlord of controlled premises paid the rates and received a compounding allowance from the local authority. In calculating the net rent, he claimed to deduct from the standard rent only the amount of the rates he actually paid and not the amount with which the occupier would have been charged if he had been rated directly.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-26', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(6218, 'Studebaker Distributors Ltd v Charlton Steam Shipping Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Studebaker Distributors Ltd v Charlton Steam Shipping Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ince Roscoe Wilson & Glover., Lightbounds Jones & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Studebaker Distributors Ltd v Charlton Steam Shipping Co LtdA bill of lading, entered into in the United States of America, and therefore required by the law of that country to be expressed to be subject to all the terms and conditions of the Harter Act, provided for the loading of the ship under the inspection of a surveyor of the Board of Underwriters of New York, and the receipt of a certificate in the usual form, certifying that the vessel had conformed to the rules of that Board', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-03', 'SHIPPING'),
(6219, 'Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd (No 2)', '', '../links/cases/Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'White & Leonard & Nicholls & Co., Oswald Hickson Collier & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Sutherland Publishing Co Ltd v Caxton Publishing Co Ltd (No 2) In an action for an alleged infringement of the plaintiffs’ copyright in a certain publication, the plaintiffs claimed, inter alia, an inquiry as to (i) damages suffered by reason of the infringement, and (ii) damages for conversion. The defendants admitted the infringement and submitted to an inquiry as to what damages the plaintiffs had suffered, but they relied upon the Copyright Act 1911, s 10, and the Statute of Limitations in answer to the plaintiffs’ claim.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-15', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(6220, 'Tata Hydro-Electric Agencies Ltd (Bombay) v Income Tax Commissioner, Bombay Presidency and Aden', '', '../links/cases/Tata Hydro.pdf', 'Yes', 'Stanley Johnson & Allen., The Solicitor India Office', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Tata Hydro-Electric Agencies Ltd (Bombay) v Income Tax Commissioner, Bombay Presidency and Aden The appellant company carried on business as managing agent of various electric supply companies, including the Tata Power Co Ltd, having by an assignment, dated 21 November 1929, succeeded to this agency formerly held by Tata Sons Ltd, subject to certain obligations.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-12', 'COMPANY'),
(6221, 'Tate v Tate', '', '../links/cases/Tate v Tate.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kenneth Brown Baker Baker', '1938', 'Supreme', 'Tate v Tate In April 1931, the respondent, the husband, treated the petitioner in such a way as to terrify her, and she went back to her mother.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-04', 'FAMILY');
INSERT INTO `courtrulings` (`id`, `title`, `content`, `link`, `isshow`, `author`, `date`, `courttype`, `summary`, `presiding`, `casetype`, `subjectmatter`, `caseno`, `counsel1`, `counsel2`, `courtname`, `caseDate`, `subjectmattertitle`) VALUES
(6222, 'Taylor v Taylor', '', '../links/cases/Taylor v Taylor.pdf', 'Yes', 'Montagu’s & Cox & Cardale., Jacques Asquith & Jacques', '1937', 'High Court', 'Taylor v Taylor In an action by a wife for the recovery of money alleged to be due to her under a separation agreement, the husband contended that the aggregate of the payments made exceeded the amount payable under the agreement after income tax, which he was entitled to deduct, had been deducted, and that he had, therefore, overpaid his wife, and that nothing was due to her.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-12', 'FAMILY'),
(6223, 'Terrene Ltd v Nelson', '', '../links/cases/Terrene Ltd v Nelson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Marshall & Hicks Beach., Turner & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Terrene Ltd v Nelson In the particulars of an estate supplied to an intending purchaser, it was stated that the estate included inter alia an inn and farm let at a rent of £193. The vendor intimated that he had had an offer of £250 a year, but had been unwilling to disturb the tenant.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-15', 'LAND '),
(6224, 'The Arantzazu Mendi', '', '../links/cases/The Arantzazu Mendi.pdf', 'Yes', 'Petch & Co., H A Crowe & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'The Arantzazu Mendi The ship Arantzazu Mendi, described as of the port of Bilbao, arrived at London on 11 August 1937. On 19 June 1937, Bilbao had been captured by General Franco’s forces, and on 28 June 1937, the ship was requisitioned by a decree of the Spanish Republican Government of that date. On 24 August 1937, the owners issued a writ in rem for the possession of the ship, and she was arrested.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-01', 'SHIPPING'),
(6225, 'The “Kafiristanâ€', '', '../links/cases/The kafrista.pdf', 'Yes', 'William A Crump & Son., Middleton Lewis & Clarke', '1937', 'High Court', 'The “Kafiristanâ€ The “Empress of Britainâ€ collided with the “Kafiristan,â€ blame being apportioned by agreement as to three-quarters to the “Empress of Britainâ€ and one-quarter to the “Kafiristan.â€ The “Kafiristanâ€ was badly damaged, and salvage assistance was rendered by the “Beaverford.â€', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'SHIPPING'),
(6226, 'The Nordborg, Nordborg (Owners) v C P Sherwood & Co', '', '../links/cases/The Nordborg vrs C P sherwood & Co.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pritchard Sons Partington & Holland .,Botterell & Roche', '1938', 'High Court', 'The Nordborg, Nordborg (Owners) v C P Sherwood & Co The defendants were the holders of 12 bills of lading under which they took delivery of a quantity of sawn timber borne in the plaintiff’s vessel.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-12', 'SHIPPING'),
(6227, 'The “Strannaâ€', '', '../links/cases/The stanna.pdf', 'Yes', 'Waltons & Co., William A Crump & Son', '1937', 'High Court', 'The “Strannaâ€ The “Strannaâ€ was loading from boats a deck cargo of timber to be carried “at charterers’ riskâ€ and “perils of the sea excepted even when occasioned by negligence.â€', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-22', 'SHIPPING'),
(6228, 'Thorne V Motor Trade Association and Another', '', '../links/cases/Thorne V Motor Trade Association and Anothe1.pdf', 'Yes', 'Whites & Co ., Peacock & Goddard', '1937', 'High Court', 'Thorne V Motor Trade Association and Another The respondent trust, a corporate body constituted by the Singapore Improvement Ordinance 1927, made a declaration that a house owned by the appellant company was insanitary within the meaning of s 57 of the Ordinance.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-03', 'CRIMINAL LAW '),
(6229, 'Tibbals v Port of London Authority', '', '../links/cases/Tibbals v Port of London Authority.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pattinson & Brewer., J D Ritchie', '1937', 'High Court', 'Tibbals v Port of London Authority Upon its incorporation the respondent authority took over a pension scheme, whereby it was provided that deductions be made from the wages payable to certain employees (including the appellant), and that, for the purpose of computing the superannuation allowance or pension payable to each employee, the wages were to be deemed to be at the rate of the actual wages paid to him at the time of his superannuation or retirement', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-08', 'PENSIONS'),
(6230, 'D v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children', '', '../links/cases/D v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Childre1.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ashurst, Morris, Crisp & Co', '1977', 'Appeal', 'D v National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children The appellant (‘the society’) was a voluntary body incorporated by royal charter whose purpose included\r\nthe prevention of public and private wrongs to children and the taking of action to enforce laws for the\r\nprotection of children.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-02-02', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6231, 'Davis (Inspector of Taxes) v Powell', '', '../links/cases/Davis.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kaufman, Kramer & Shebson., Victor D Zermansky & Co, Leeds', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Davis (Inspector of Taxes) v Powell The taxpayer, a tenant farmer, surrendered his lease of agricultural land in consequence of a notice to\r\nquit from his landlord. The landlord paid him the sum of £591 by way of compensation for disturbance\r\nunder s 34(1)a of the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948.', 'Rengan Krishnan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-01', 'TAXATION'),
(6232, 'Delbourgo v Field (Inspector of Taxes)', '', '../links/cases/Delbourgo v Field.pdf', 'Yes', 'Furley, Page, Fielding & Pembrook', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Delbourgo v Field (Inspector of Taxes) In 1968 the taxpayer entered into two agreements with an investment trust (‘Triumph’). By the first\r\n(‘the vending agreement’) the taxpayer agreed to sell his shareholding in D Ltd on certain terms to\r\nTriumph, and by the second (‘the service agreement’) he agreed to serve two subsidiaries of Triumph as\r\nmanaging director for ten years.', 'Rengan Krishnan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-08', 'TAXATION'),
(6233, 'Director of Public Prosecutions v Holly', '', '../links/cases/Director of Public Prosecutions v Holly.pdf', 'Yes', 'Montague Gardner & Co', '1977', 'Supreme', 'Director of Public Prosecutions v Holly The expression ‘public body’ in s 7a of the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1898 and ss 2b and 4(2)c\r\nof the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916 is not restricted to local authorities but refers to any body\r\nwhich has public or statutory duties to perform and which perform those duties and carry out their\r\ntransactions for the benefit of the public and not for private profit.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-01-27', 'CRIMINAL'),
(6234, 'Director of Public Prosecutions v Jordan', '', '../links/cases/Director of Public Prosecutions v Jordan.pdf', 'Yes', 'Offenbach & Co', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Director of Public Prosecutions v Jordan The appellant was the proprietress of a newsagent’s and book shop. The police seized a quantity of\r\nfilms, books and magazines from the shop which had been freely available for sale to members of the\r\npublic.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-16', 'CRIMINAL'),
(6235, 'Dixon v Harding and others', '', '../links/cases/Dixon v Harding and others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Solicitors: Sharpe, Pritchard & Co., Collyer-Bristow & Co., Gotelee & Goldsmith', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Dixon v Harding and others The respondents were the owners of a commercial building which from 8 February 1974 to 30\r\nSeptember 1975 (’the relevant period’) was unoccupied and therefore not being used for the purposes\r\nfor which it had been constructed or adapted.', 'Lea Josse Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-26', 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT'),
(6236, 'Dugdale v Kraft Foods Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Dugdale v Kraft Foods Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Rowleys & Blewitts., Walker, Smith & Way, Chester', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Dugdale v Kraft Foods Ltd The female employees were employed in the quality control department of the employers’ factory. The\r\nfemale employees’ work was of the same or a broadly similar nature to that done by the male\r\nemployees employed in the same department.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-28', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6237, 'Dutton v Spink and Beeching (Sales) Ltd and others', '', '../links/cases/Dutton v Spink and Beeching.pdf', 'Yes', 'Harold G Walker & Co., H Kennard & Son', '1976', 'High Court', 'Dutton v Spink and Beeching (Sales) Ltd and others In September 1969 the plaintiff met the defendants and gave them certain information relating to an\r\nappliance for typewriters which he claimed to have invented. On 25 June 1971 the plaintiff issued a writ\r\nagainst the defendants alleging that he had imparted the information in confidence and claiming relief\r\nfor breach of confidence and damages for trade libel.', 'L I Zysman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-05-26', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6238, 'Emmerson (Inspector of Taxes) v Computer Time International Ltd (in liquidation', '', '../links/cases/Emmerson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kingsley, Napley & Co', '1977', 'High Court', 'Emmerson (Inspector of Taxes) v Computer Time International Ltd (in liquidation A company carried on business in premises on the second floor of a building which it occupied under a\r\nlease for a term of 21 years from 25 March 1969 at a rent of £19,000 per annum, payable quarterly in\r\nadvance on the usual quarter days.', 'Rengan Krishnan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-02-11', 'TAXATION'),
(6239, 'Faulkner v Love (trading as W Love & Son)', '', '../links/cases/Faulkner v Love.pdf', 'Yes', 'Raymond & Williams., Lovell, Son & Pitfield', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Faulkner v Love (trading as W Love & Son) The occupier of a mobile home on a protected site was dissatisfied with the terms of the agreement\r\noffered to him, in accordance with s 1(2)a of the Mobile Homes Act 1975, by the site owner. The\r\noccupier applied, under s 4(5)b of the 1975 Act, to a county court (‘the first court’) for the determination\r\nof the matter in dispute on the agreement.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-24', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6240, 'Federal Commerce and Navigation Co Ltd v Tradax Export SA', '', '../links/cases/Federal Commerce and Navigation Co Ltd v Tradax Export SA.pdf', 'Yes', 'Richards, Butler and Co., Holman, Fenwick and Willan', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Federal Commerce and Navigation Co Ltd v Tradax Export SA By a port charter made in January 1970 the vessel Maratha Envoy, a large bulk carrier, was engaged to\r\ncarry a cargo of grain from American to North Europe.', 'J H Fazan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-25', 'SHIPPING'),
(6241, 'Ferguson v John Dawson & Partners (Contractors) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Ferguson v John Dawson & Partners (Contractors) Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'John King & Co., Crombie, Wilkinson & Robinson', '1976', 'High Court', 'Ferguson v John Dawson & Partners (Contractors) Ltd In January 1972 the defendants, who were building contractors, orally engaged the plaintiff through\r\ntheir site agent to work as a general labourer. The plaintiff was told that there were no cards, they\r\nwere ‘purely working as a lump labour force’.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-07-22', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6242, 'Fitzleet Estates Ltd v Cherry (Inspector of Taxes)', '', '../links/cases/Fitzleet Estates Ltd v Cherry.pdf', 'Yes', 'Slaughter & May', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Fitzleet Estates Ltd v Cherry (Inspector of Taxes) The taxpayer company (‘the company’) was a property holding company and a subsidiary of B Ltd. The\r\ncompany purchased sites in 1959 and 1960 and developed them between 1960 and 1961. In the course\r\nof the development, the company incurred interest charges on money borrowed from B Ltd and from its\r\nbankers.', 'Rengan Krishnan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-03', 'TAXATION'),
(6243, 'Tomley v Shreeve', '', '../links/cases/Tomley v Shreeve.pdf', 'Yes', 'J C Brookhouse., Owen White & Catlin', '1937', 'High Court', 'Tomley v Shreeve It was alleged that a local branch of a friendly society had improperly purchased certain freehold property, and the parent society sued for a declaration that the purchase was an improper one, in breach of the rules and a breach of trust, and that the defendants were to make good to the lodge the money spent upon the purchase', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-26', 'COMPANY'),
(6244, 'Fougere v Phoenix Motor Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Fougere v Phoenix Motor Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kenneth Brown, Baker, Simpson, Millar', '1976', 'High Court', 'Fougere v Phoenix Motor Co Ltd The appellant, who was 58 years of age, was employed by the respondents. He was in poor health and\r\nonly fit to do light work at his own pace. The respondents dismissed him from his employment. An\r\nindustrial tribunal held that he had been unfairly dismissed.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-06-30', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6245, 'Foy v Brooks', '', '../links/cases/Foy v Brooks.pdf', 'Yes', 'Woodbridge & Sons', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Foy v Brooks In affiliation proceedings the mother applied for an order for payment by the putative father of the sum\r\nof £50 expended by the mother on providing blankets, napkins, vests, suits, bottles, feeding equipment\r\nand sheets for the child on its birth on the ground that the sum expended constituted ‘expenses\r\nincidental to the birth of the child’, within s 4(2)(b) of the Affiliation Proceedings Act 1957.', 'Georgina Chambers Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-18', 'FAMILY'),
(6246, 'Trubyfield v Great Western Railway Co', '', '../links/cases/Trubyfield v Great Western Railway Co.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barlow Lyde & Gilbert., A G Hubbard', '1937', 'High Court', 'Trubyfield v Great Western Railway Co Held – though, in the case of a very young child, some reduction of damages must be made, having regard to children’s ailments, yet, in the case of one who has outlived such dangers, there should be no such reduction on account of the infancy. The question of the inability of the child to appreciate the loss of expectation of life is wholly immaterial.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-12-03', 'TORTS'),
(6247, 'French Kier Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and another', '', '../links/cases/French Kier Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and another.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bates, Son & Braby', '1976', 'High Court', 'French Kier Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and another The appellants applied for planning permission to develop for residential purposes 42 acres of land at\r\nGrays in Essex. The site formed part of the metropolitan green belt but it was also in an area of major\r\ngrowth where it was government policy to encourage local authorities to have in hand a five year supply\r\nof residential land.', 'K Mydeen Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-19', 'TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING'),
(6248, 'General and Municipal Workers Union v Certification Officer and another', '', '../links/cases/General and Municipal Workers Union v Certification Officer and another.pdf', 'Yes', 'Stanley, Washbrough & Co', '1976', 'High Court', 'General and Municipal Workers Union v Certification Officer and another An association of employees applied to the certification officer, under s 8(1) of the Employment\r\nProtection Act 1975, for a certificate that it was independent. The certification officer advertised the\r\napplication, pursuant to s 8(6)a, and a trade union (‘the GMWU’) made representations to him opposing\r\nthe grant of a certificate.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-08', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6249, 'Tudor-Hart v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection', '', '../links/cases/Tudor.pdf', 'Yes', 'Deacon & Co., Underwood Barron & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Tudor-Hart v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection In answer to a claim for libel, it was pleaded that, in so far as the words complained of were statements of fact, they were true in substance and in fact, and, in so far as they were expressions of opinion, they were fair comment upon the “said factsâ€ which were matters of public interest.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-22', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6250, 'Gilbert v Goldstone Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Gilbert v Goldstone Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Victor D Zermansky & Co., J Levi & Co, Leeds', '1976', 'High Court', 'Gilbert v Goldstone Ltd The applicant was employed for many years as a cutter by the respondents, a firm of clothing\r\nmanufacturers. Unlike the rest of the work force the applicant was paid on a monthly basis and,\r\nalthough the terms of his employment required him to work overtime when necessary, he was not\r\nentitled to any additional remuneration for overtime work.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-07-09', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6251, 'Union Cold Storage Co Ltd v Ellerker', '', '../links/cases/Union Cold Storage Co Ltd v Ellerker.pdf', 'Yes', 'Pinsent & Co., Solicitor of Inland Revenue', '1938', 'High Court', 'Union Cold Storage Co Ltd v Ellerker In 1901, the appellant company were granted for a term of 40 years a lease of land upon which a warehouse was to be erected by the lessors, the rent being based partly upon the cost of erection.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-23', 'TAXATION'),
(6252, 'Goldsmith v Pressdram Ltd and others', '', '../links/cases/Goldsmith v Pressdram Ltd and others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Eric Levine & Co, Bindman & Partners', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Goldsmith v Pressdram Ltd and others The applicant, who was the chairman of several large public companies, was subjected to a persistent\r\ncampaign of a defamatory character in a fortnightly magazine published, edited and distributed by the\r\nrespondents.', 'Christine Ivamy Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-04-14', 'TORTS'),
(6253, 'Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers and others', '', '../links/cases/Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers and others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Trower, Still & Keeling, Shaen Roscoe & Bracewell', '1977', 'Appeal', 'Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers and others On the evening of Thursday, 13 January 1977, the plaintiff saw a news bulletin on television in which it\r\nwas reported that the executive council of the Union of Post Office Workers had resolved that day to call\r\non its members to impose a boycott on all postal communications between Britain and South Africa.', 'Sumra Green Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-01-27', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6254, 'Green and others v Broxtowe District Council', '', '../links/cases/Green and others v Broxtowe District Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Anderson & Co, Nottingham', '1976', 'High Court', 'Green and others v Broxtowe District Council It seems to us that the first words of that subsection are plainly mandatory. I repeat: ‘A woman is to be\r\nregarded as employed on work rated as equivalent with that of any men’ if her job has been given an\r\nequal value under a study undertaken with a view to evaluating jobs.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-10', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6255, 'Hobbs v Marlowe', '', '../links/cases/Hobbs v Marlowe.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hewitt Woollacott & Chown ., Amery-Parkes & Co', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Hobbs v Marlowe The plaintiff’s motor car was involved in a collision with the defendant’s car. The collision was caused by\r\nthe defendant’s negligence. The cost of repairing the damage to the plaintiff’s car was £237·59. In\r\naddition the plaintiff incurred expenses of £63·53 in hiring another car while his own was being repaired.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-21', 'INSURANCE'),
(6256, 'Unsworth v Pease & Partners Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Unsworth v Pease.pdf', 'Yes', 'Johnson Weatherall Sturt & Hardy., Corbin Greener & Cook', '1937', 'High Court', 'Unsworth v Pease & Partners Ltd A miner, in addition to his work as a collier, acted as a sub-checkweighman at the colliery and collected subscriptions from members of his union.', 'Derek H Kitchin Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-11', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6257, 'Home Counties Dairies Ltd v Woods', '', '../links/cases/Home Counties Dairies Ltd v Woods.pdf', 'Yes', 'Warner, Goodman & Co., P N Jones, Woking', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Home Counties Dairies Ltd v Woods In May 1973 W started employment with a company as a milk salesman. The Industrial Relations Act\r\n1971 was then in force and W’s contract of employment set out his right under that Act to join, or not to\r\nbe a member of, a trade union.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-19', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6258, 'House and others v Reynolds', '', '../links/cases/House and others v Reynolds.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hepherd, Winstanley & Pugh., Matthew Reynolds,Southampton', '1976', 'Appeal', 'House and others v ReynoldsThe appellants, some of whom were drivers and the others proprietors of taxis, were members of a\r\ngroup of operators running a centralised telephone booking office for the hire of taxis. The practice of\r\nthe appellants was to require a person wishing to hire a taxi by telephone to pay, in addition to the fare\r\nrecorded on the taximeter, a ‘booking fee’ of 10p.', 'N P Metcalfe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-03', 'TRANSPORT'),
(6259, 'Uxbridge Permanent Benefit Building Society v Pickard', '', '../links/cases/Uxbridge Permanent Benefit Building Society v Pickard.pdf', 'Yes', 'Woodbridge & Sons., Pickard & Co', '1938', 'High Court', 'Uxbridge Permanent Benefit Building Society v Pickard A solicitor’s managing clerk obtained an advance of a sum of £500 upon a mortgage of property by producing to the society’s solicitors a fictitious deed. It was not proved that the solicitor’s clerk actually forged the deed, but he must have known that it was a forged document.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-08', 'TORTS'),
(6260, 'Ichard and another v Frangoulis', '', '../links/cases/Ichard and another v Frangoulis.pdf', 'Yes', 'R I Lewis & Co., Barlow, Lyde & Gilbert', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Ichard and another v Frangoulis Damages in tort for loss of enjoyment of a holiday resulting from injuries sustained in a car accident\r\noccurring whilst the plaintiff is on holiday are, if the loss is reasonably foreseeable, recoverable from the\r\nnegligent party as part of the general damages, but not as a separate head of damage', 'K Mydeen Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-01', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6261, 'Vernazza v Barburriza & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Vernazza v Barburriza.pdf', 'Yes', 'Clapham Fraser & Williams', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Vernazza v Barburriza & Co Ltd During the trial of an action for breach of contract and wrongful dismissal, the plaintiff had a discussion with the judge in his private room, of which discussion a shorthand note was taken, by the judge’s orders. No representative of the defendants was present at the discussion.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-15', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6262, 'Industrial Properties', '', '../links/cases/Industrial Properties.pdf', 'Yes', 'Lewis, Lewis and Co., Wilde, Sapte and Co', '1977', 'Appeal', 'Industrial Properties In 1959 the Parker family agreed to sell certain freehold premises which they owned to a newly formed\r\ncompany, IP Ltd, of which they were the directors and the shareholders. The agreement was registered\r\nand the purchase price paid but the premises were never conveyed to IP Ltd.', 'Wendy Shockett Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-02-02', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(6263, 'Vernon v Findlay', '', '../links/cases/Vernon v Findlay.pdf', 'Yes', 'Scott Duckers & Co., Gamlen Bowerman & Forward., Forsyte Kerman & Phillips', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Vernon v Findlay On 1 December 1936, the defendants entered into a verbal contract with the plaintiff to employ him as sales manager as from 1 January 1937, for a company to be formed, at a salary of £350 per year and commission.', 'W J Alderman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-02', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6264, 'Victor Weston (Fabrics) Ltd v Morgensterns (a Firm)', '', '../links/cases/Victor Weston.pdf', 'Yes', 'Henry Hilbery & Son.,Wigram & Co', '1937', 'Supreme', 'Victor Weston (Fabrics) Ltd v Morgensterns (a Firm) The defendants executed a deed of arrangement for the benefit of their creditors. The trustee under the deed sent a circular letter to all the defendants’ creditors announcing the deed and undertaking to pay for goods ordered for current purposes.', 'Gerald Abrahams Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-09', 'BANKRUPTCY'),
(6265, 'Inland Revenue Commissioners v Cookson', '', '../links/cases/Inland Revenue Commissioners v Cookson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Dickinson Dees and Co', '1977', 'High Court', 'Inland Revenue Commissioners v Cookson By a trust instrument dated 19 March 1953 the taxpayer settled certain freehold land, inter alia, on trust\r\nfor himself for his life and from and after his death for the first and every other son of the taxpayer\r\nsuccessively in remainder one after the other, according to seniority, in tail male, with remainders over.', 'L I Zysman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-01-27', 'TAXATION'),
(6266, 'James Buchanan & Co Ltd v Babco Forwarding and Shipping (UK) Ltd', '', '../links/cases/James Buchanan.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ingledew, Brown, Bennison & Garrett,Elborne, Mitchell & Co', '1976', 'Supreme', 'James Buchanan & Co Ltd v Babco Forwarding and Shipping (UK) Ltd The plaintiffs who were whisky distillers agreed to sell a quantity of whisky to buyers in Iran. The\r\nplaintiffs contracted with carriers for the carriage of the whisky from Scotland, where it was in a bonded\r\nwarehouse, to Iran; the carriage was to be via Felixstowe, across the Channel and through Europe.', 'Wendy Shockett Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-02', 'CONTRACT'),
(6267, 'Jean Kraut AG v Albany Fabrics Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Jean Kraut AG v Albany Fabrics Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Fremont & Co.,Benson, Mazure & Co', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Jean Kraut AG v Albany Fabrics Ltd The defendants, an English company, contracted to buy from the plaintiffs, a Swiss company, a quantity\r\nof cloth to be delivered in monthly consignments of specified amounts. The proper law of the contract\r\nwas Swiss.', 'Christine Ivamy Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-03-01', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6268, 'Walker v Walker and Walker', '', '../links/cases/Walker v Walker and Walker.pdf', 'Yes', 'Atkinson Saunders & Co., Drake Son & Parton., Samuel Bishop & Sons', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Walker v Walker and Walker A husband obtained a decree nisi of dissolution of marriage on the ground of the wife’s adultery with the co-respondent, who was ordered to pay the costs of the suit.', 'M D Chorlton Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-06-21', 'FAMILY'),
(6269, 'Johnson v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Johnson v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'J Memery & Co', '1976', 'High Court', 'Johnson v Inland Revenue Commissioners The taxpayer and her husband during their married life were not separately assessed to tax. The\r\nhusband was assessed to surtax for the years 1961–62 and 1965–66. Those assessments were made,\r\nrespectively in 1962 and 1966.', 'Rengan Krishnan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-12', 'TAXATION'),
(6270, 'Johnson v Ribbins and others (Sir Francis Pittis & Son (a firm), third party)', '', '../links/cases/Johnson v Ribbins and others.pdf', 'Yes', 'Reynolds, Porter, Chamberlain & Co., Charles Mason & Co', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Johnson v Ribbins and others (Sir Francis Pittis & Son (a firm), third party) Where a question arises as to the incidence of costs between a successful defendant and a successful\r\nthird party in a case where the plaintiff is legally aided, there is no principle that the impact of legal aid\r\nshould be made to fall on the defendant and third party alike and that the court should therefore order\r\nthe third party’s costs to be paid by the plaintiff and not be the defendant.', 'Sumra Green Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-01', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6271, 'Way v Latilla', '', '../links/cases/Way v Latilla.pdf', 'Yes', 'Edwin Coe & Calder Wood., Birkbeck Julius Edwards & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Way v Latilla The appellant alleged that he had made an agreement with the respondent that the appellant should obtain and send to the respondent information relating to gold mines and concessions in West Africa, and that the appellant should introduce concessions for acquisition by the respondent, and that the respondent would protect the appellant’s interests in respect of concessions acquired, and give to the appellant the customary, or a reasonable, share in the same, and should pay to the appellant a reasonable sum in respect of information and reports.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-28', 'EMPLOYMENT'),
(6272, 'Jones (A E) v Jones (F W)', '', '../links/cases/Jones.pdf', 'Yes', 'Mears, Hobbs & Durrant, Lowestoft,Lucas & Wyllys, Lowestoft', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Jones (A E) v Jones (F W) In 1964 the defendant’s father remarried. On his remarriage he made a will bequeathing to his new\r\nwife, the plaintiff, all his property other than two houses in Kingston upon Thames in which the\r\ndefendant and his brother, respectively, were living.', 'Gavin Gore-Andrews Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-28', 'LAND'),
(6273, 'Jowett v Earl of Bradford', '', '../links/cases/Jowett v Earl of Bradford.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bowdler & Sons, Shrewsbury,O H Parsons', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Jowett v Earl of Bradford The employee applied to an industrial tribunal for compensation for unfair dismissal. At the end of the\r\nhearing the tribunal (‘the first tribunal’) orally indicated that it found in favour of the employee and that\r\nthe matter should be referred to the employer with a recommendation that the employee be\r\nreinstated.', 'Salim H J Merali Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-25', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6274, 'Welch v Royal Exchange Assurance', '', '../links/cases/Welch v Royal Exchange Assurance.pdf', 'Yes', 'Philip Conway Thomas & Co., William Charles Crocker', '1938', 'High Court', 'Welch v Royal Exchange Assurance The claimant was insured with the defendants against fire, and the policy contained a condition which, so far as its nature permitted, was deemed to be a condition precedent to the right of the insured to recover thereunder.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-11-11', 'INSURANCE'),
(6275, 'Whatmough v Morris Motors Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Whatmough v Morris Motors Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'C R Enever & Co .,Preston Lane-Claypon & O’Kelly', '1938', 'High Court', 'Whatmough v Morris Motors Ltd In that state of the rule, Clauson J, as he then was, in a case which came before him—namely, Fraser v Simpsons (Piccadilly) Ltd and Platinum Products Ltd—elaborated a form of order which gave full effect, if I may so describe it, to what appeared to be the policy of the rule.', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-10-25', 'INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY'),
(6276, 'White v Bijou Mansions Ltd', '', '../links/cases/White v Bijou Mansions Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'T & N Blanco White., Laytons', '1937', 'High Court', 'White v Bijou Mansions Ltd The plaintiff, the registered proprietor of certain property, derived title under two deeds of 1886 and 1887 which contained a covenant by the purchaser of the property, which formed part of an estate, that he would build a dwelling-house thereon and that he would use the same for a private residence, and for no other purpose.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-28', 'LAND '),
(6277, 'Williams v Johnson (since deceased), now represented by Williams and Another', '', '../links/cases/Williams v Johnson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Leader Plunkett & Leader., Laurence Jones & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Williams v Johnson (since deceased), now represented by Williams and Another Appellant, a medical practitioner, and an intimate friend of the respondent, an elderly widow, attended her professionally during two illnesses in the years 1928 and 1930.', 'T A Dillon Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-11', 'COMMONWEALTH'),
(6278, 'Wilson v Wright', '', '../links/cases/Wilson v Wright.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ingledew Sons & Brown., Kinch & Richardson', '1937', 'High Court', 'Wilson v Wright The seller offered for sale potatoes “for Saturday’s steamer.â€ The buyer accepted the potatoes by telegram, adding the words “next steamer,â€ which was in fact “Saturday’s steamer.â€', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-11-12', 'SALE OF GOODS'),
(6279, 'Wiltshire Bacon Co Ltd v Associated Cinema Properties Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Wiltshire Bacon Co Ltd v Associated Cinema Properties Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sharpe Pritchard & Co., H S Wright & Webb', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Wiltshire Bacon Co Ltd v Associated Cinema Properties Ltd The plaintiffs complained that a building which the defendants were erecting would interfere with certain ancient lights. Negotiations were entered into to see if the parties could agree a sum by way of compensation for the damage which the plaintiffs alleged would be caused to their property.', 'Reginald Townsend Esq Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-10-15', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6280, 'Withington v Bolton Borough Council', '', '../links/cases/Withington v Bolton Borough Council.pdf', 'Yes', 'Walter H Goulding.,  H B Ashford', '1937', 'High Court', 'Withington v Bolton Borough Council A road had been dedicated to and accepted by the public but not yet adopted by the local authority, so that the road was repairable by no one.', 'M D Chorlton Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-05', 'ENVIRONMENTAL'),
(6281, 'Woodman v Richardson and Concrete Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Woodman v Richardson and Concrete Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Forsyte Kerman & Phillips., L Bingham & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Woodman v Richardson and Concrete Ltd R had contracted to erect a building and to do so he had to erect a scaffolding for the use of his own workmen and of the sub-contractors’ workmen', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-29', 'TORTS'),
(6282, 'Woods v Woods', '', '../links/cases/Woods v Woods.pdf', 'Yes', 'Braikenridge & Edwards ., J B de Fonblanque., Piper Smith & Piper', '1938', 'Appeal', 'Woods v Woods The respondent, a solicitor, was anxious to obtain a divorce from his wife. In 1934 the wife had, with the approval of the husband, agreed to purchase a house, and found herself in the greatest straits to find £115 19s 3d required to complete the purchase.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1938-07-28', 'FAMILY'),
(6283, 'Workington Harbour and Dock Board v Trade Indemnity Co Ltd (No 2)', '', '../links/cases/Workington Harbour and Dock Board v Trade Indemnity Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Wedlake Letts & Birds., Johnson Weatherall Sturt & Hardy', '1937', 'High Court', 'Workington Harbour and Dock Board v Trade Indemnity Co Ltd (No 2) A firm of contractors agreed to construct a new and enlarged dock. The defendant company gave the dock board a bond in the sum of £50,000 to guarantee the performance of the contract. The contractors defaulted, and the dock board brought an action against the defendant company upon the bond.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-05-25', 'CONTRACT'),
(6284, 'Worshipful Company of Carpenters of the City of London v British Mutual Banking Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Worshipful Company of Carpenters of the City of London v British Mutual Banking Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Sir John J Stavridi., White & Leonard & Nicholls & Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Worshipful Company of Carpenters of the City of London v British Mutual Banking Co Ltd The plaintiffs, as managers of a convalescent home, kept an account with the defendant bank. The plaintiffs employed a secretary of the committee which managed the home, who kept his personal account with the defendant bank.', 'E Fuller Briscoe Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-29', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(6285, 'Wragg v Samuel Fox & Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Wragg v Samuel Fox.pdf', 'Yes', 'Corbin Greener & Cook., Raley & Sons., Sturt & Hardy., Rhodes Cockburn & Co', '1937', 'Appeal', 'Wragg v Samuel Fox & Co Ltd The appellant had been employed by the respondents for 41 years up to April 1935, the last 20 years being spent underground in a coal mine.', 'Michael Marcus Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-15', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6286, 'Wyatt v Wyatt', '', '../links/cases/Wyatt v Wyatt.pdf', 'Yes', 'Peacock & Goddard., Treasury Solicitor', '1937', 'High Court', 'Wyatt v Wyatt A husband and wife separated in the summer of 1935, there being no suggestion of adultery up to that time. Before parting, discussions had taken place as to a divorce based upon evidence to be provided by the husband, the wife even suggesting that, for the sake of the husband’s career, he should divorce her, but this the husband refused to consider.', 'J F Compton Miller Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-20', 'FAMILY'),
(6287, 'Yukon Consolidated Gold Corporation Ltd v Clark', '', '../links/cases/Yukon Consolidated Gold Corporation Ltd v Clark.pdf', 'Yes', 'Broad & Son., Percy Haseldine Co', '1937', 'High Court', 'Yukon Consolidated Gold Corporation Ltd v Clark The defendant brought an action against the plaintiff company in the Supreme Court of Ontario. The action was dismissed with costs, and an appeal to the Court of Appeal in Ontario was also dismissed with costs.', 'C St J Nicholson Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-03-22', 'CONTRACT'),
(6288, 'Zetland (Marquess) and Zetland Estates Company v Driver and Another', '', '../links/cases/Zetland vrs driver.pdf', 'Yes', 'Frere Cholmeley & Co., H E Griffith & Son', '1937', 'High Court', 'Zetland (Marquess) and Zetland Estates Company v Driver and Another A conveyance of shop premises, being a small portion of a large area of settled land, contained the following covenant: “The purchaser to the intent and so as to bind so far as practicable the property hereby conveyed into whosesoever hands the same may come and to benefit and protect such part or parts of the lands now subject to the settlement (a) as shall for the time being remain unsold or (b) as shall be sold by the vendor or his successors in title with the express benefit of this covenant covenants with the vendor that the purchaser will at all times observe …â€ and in particular that “no act or thing shall be done or permitted on the said land which in the opinion of the vendor may be a public or private nuisance or prejudicial or detrimental to the vendor and the owners or occupiers of any adjoining property or to the neighbourhood.â€', 'W K Scrivener Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1937-07-29', 'LAND '),
(6289, 'K v K (divorce costs: interest)', '', '../links/cases/K v K.pdf', 'Yes', 'Theodore Goddard & Co.,', '1976', 'High Court', 'K v K (divorce costs: interest) The husband and wife were divorced in 1972. The first part of the divorce proceedings, up to decree\r\nabsolute, took place in the county court. The proceedings were then transferred to the High Court for\r\ndetermination of the wife’s application for ancillary relief.', 'Wendy Shockett Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-02', 'FAMILY'),
(6290, 'Kennealy and another v Dunne and another', '', '../links/cases/Kennealy and another v Dunne and another.pdf', 'Yes', 'Barnett & Co., P Ellis & Co', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Kennealy and another v Dunne and another The landlords were the owners of a flat in a building in London which previously they had occupied as\r\ntheir residence.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-26', 'LANDLORD AND TENANT'),
(6291, 'Laker Airways Ltd v Department of Trade', '', '../links/cases/Laker Airways Ltd v Department of Trade.pdf', 'Yes', 'Roney Vincent & Co', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Laker Airways Ltd v Department of Trade In October 1972 the plaintiffs were granted an air transport licence by the Civil Aviation Authority (‘the\r\nCAA’) under the Civil Aviation Act 1971 to provide a low cost passenger air service, known as ‘Skytrain’,\r\nfor a period of 10 years from 1 January 1973 between London and New York.', 'Gavin Gore-Andrews Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-12-15', 'AVIATION'),
(6292, 'Lively Ltd and another v City of Munich', '', '../links/cases/Lively Ltd and another v City of Munich.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kenneth Brown, Baker, Simpson, Millar', '1976', 'Supreme', 'Lively Ltd and another v City of Munich The plaintiffs were registered holders of bonds issued by the defendants in 1928. The terms of the\r\nbonds provided, inter alia, that they would be redeemable by 1 December 1953 at the holder’s option in\r\neither sterling or United States dollars at a fixed rate of $4·86 to the pound, but the loan went into\r\ndefault on the outbreak of war in 1939.', 'R L Bayne-Powell', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-06-30', 'BANKING AND FINANCE'),
(6293, 'London and Harrogate Securities Ltd v Pitts and another', '', '../links/cases/London and Harrogate Securities Ltd v Pitts and another.pdf', 'Yes', 'Malcolm Brookes & Co.,Coward Chance', '1976', 'Supreme', 'London and Harrogate Securities Ltd v Pitts and another In May 1974 the plaintiffs, who were licensed moneylenders, lent P £16,500 for two months. Part of the\r\nloan was used to discharge a mortgage of £3,500 outstanding on P’s property which he had contracted\r\nto sell.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-07-06', 'CONSUMER'),
(6294, 'Lord Chetwode v Inland Revenue Commissioners', '', '../links/cases/Lord Chetwode v Inland Revenue Commissioners.pdf', 'Yes', 'Withers', '1977', 'Supreme', 'Lord Chetwode v Inland Revenue Commissioners At all material times, the taxpayer was ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom. In 1967, he created a\r\nsettlement and appointed TCB Ltd, a company incorporated in the Bahamas, as trustee of the\r\nsettlement.', 'Rengan Krishnan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-02-16', 'TAXATION'),
(6295, 'MacShannon v Rockware Glass Ltd', '', '../links/cases/MacShannon v Rockware Glass Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'Davies Arnold & Cooper., Robin Thompson and Partners', '1977', 'Appeal', 'MacShannon v Rockware Glass Ltd The plaintiff was a Scotsman who lived and worked in Scotland. He was employed by the defendants, a\r\nlimited company. Although the defendants had a place of business in Scotland, their registered office\r\nand headquarters were in London.', 'Sumra Green Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-02-16', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6296, 'Maharaj v Attorney General for Trinidad and Tobago', '', '../links/cases/Maharaj v Attorney General for Trinidad and Tobago.pdf', 'Yes', 'Charles Russell & Co', '1976', 'High Court', 'Maharaj v Attorney General for Trinidad and Tobago On 2 April 1975 the appellant was engaged as counsel in a case in the Court of Appeal, Trinidad which\r\nwas estimated to last five days. The appellant had also accepted two briefs to appear in another court\r\non 14 April.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-10-11', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6297, 'Makins v Elson', '', '../links/cases/Makins v Elson.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kenneth Brown, Baker, Simpson, Millar', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Makins v Elson In July 1970 the taxpayer purchased for £1,800 a plot of land in respect of which planning permission for\r\na dwelling-house had already been granted. In August 1970 he moved on to the site with a caravan and\r\nlived there with his family.', 'Rengan Krishnan Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-18', 'TAXATION'),
(6298, 'Mardorf Peach & Co Ltd v Attica Sea Carriers Corporation of Liberia', '', '../links/cases/Mardorf Peach.pdf', 'Yes', 'Clyde & Co., Holman Fenwick & Willan', '1977', 'Supreme', 'Mardorf Peach & Co Ltd v Attica Sea Carriers Corporation of Liberia The appellants were the owners of a ship which they chartered in January 1970 to the respondents on a\r\ntime charter. The charterparty provided that the hire was to be paid ‘in cash semi-monthly in advance’\r\nand was to be paid ‘to the Owners … into their account’ with the branch of a bank (‘FNCB’) to the credit\r\nof a named account.', 'Mary Rose Plummer Barrister.', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1977-02-02', 'SHIPPING'),
(6299, 'Maynard v Osmond', '', '../links/cases/Maynard v Osmond.pdf', 'Yes', 'Bernard Sheridan & Co., Theodore Goddard & Co', '1976', 'High Court', 'Maynard v Osmond In November 1975 three young men were arrested and charged with being drunk and disorderly. At the\r\npolice station they recognised the plaintiff, who was one of the constables on duty, as an acquaintance.\r\nThe men were put into cells for the night.', 'Wendy Shockett Barrister', 'Criminal', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-05-24', 'CRIMINAL'),
(6300, 'McDonnell v McDonnell', '', '../links/cases/McDonnell v McDonnell.pdf', 'Yes', 'Kennedy, Ponsonby & PrideauxCharles Russell & Co', '1976', 'Appeal', 'McDonnell v McDonnell On the wife’s application for ancillary relief, following her divorce, the judge ordered the husband to pay., \r\nthe wife a lump sum of £2,000 and periodical payments, and also ordered the husband to transfer to the\r\nwife his interest in the matrimonial home (originally acquired by the husband but subsequently\r\ntransferred into the parties’ joint names), subject to a fixed charge in the husband’s favour of £10,000,\r\nwhich represented one-third of the value of the house.', 'L I Zysman Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-04-12', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6301, 'Mehmet v Perry and another', '', '../links/cases/Mehmet v Perry and another.pdf', 'Yes', 'Hall, Grant & Co', '1976', 'High Court', 'Mehmet v Perry and another The plaintiff and his wife had five children under the age of 17. The two youngest children, H and S,\r\nsuffered from a rare blood disorder and as a result they had to be taken to hospital periodically to\r\nreceive blood transfusions; they also had to have daily injections which were administered at home by a\r\nnurse and had to be given tablets at home twice daily.', 'K Mydeen Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-03', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE'),
(6302, 'Michael v Gowland', '', '../links/cases/Michael v Gowland.pdf', 'Yes', 'Ronald & Fletcher., Baker & Co', '1976', 'Appeal', 'Michael v Gowland On 15 October 1975 the applicant applied to justices for reduction of the amount payable by him under\r\nan affiliation order on the ground that his circumstances had changed since the order was made. The\r\njustices, acting without jurisdiction, increased the amount payable by the applicant under the order.', 'Georgina Chambers Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-11-30', 'ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE'),
(6303, 'Moeliker v A Reyrolle and Co Ltd', '', '../links/cases/Moeliker v A Reyrolle and Co Ltd.pdf', 'Yes', 'W H Thompson, Stanmore., Tilly Swangren & Co', '1976', 'High Court', 'Moeliker v A Reyrolle and Co Ltd In awarding damages for personal injury in a case where the plaintiff is still in employment at the date of\r\nthe trial, the court should only make an award for loss of earning capacity if there is a substantial or real,\r\nand not merely fanciful, risk that the plaintiff will lose his present employment at some time before the\r\nestimated end of his working life.', 'A S Virdi Esq Barrister', 'Civil', '', '', '', '', '', '1976-01-30', 'CIVIL PROCEDURE');
