NIMAKO v. ARCHIBOLD Landlord and tenant—Dwelling-house—Recovery of possession—Landlord reasonably requiring premises for his personal use and as accommodation for his adult children—Determination of reasonableness—Whether “any member of his family” excludes children of full age or married children—Whether discomfort and inconvenience can amount to hardship—Whether landlord bound to provide tenant with alternative accommodation—Rent Control Ordinance, 1952 (No. 2 of 1952, s. 11 (1) (d)).