Daniels and Daniels v R White & Sons Ltd and Tarbard A husband and wife sued the manufacturers and the retailer of a bottle of lemonade for damages for injuries received by reason of the fact that the bottle contained 38 grains of carbolic acid in addition to the lemonade. Both plaintiffs, in suing the manufacturers, relied upon the doctrine enunciated in M‘Alister (or Donoghue) v Stevenson.