ATUGUBA, J.S.C:

The facts of this case have been related by my brother Dotse, J.S.C. and I would not repeat them except where necessary.

The plaintiff claims before us per its writ of summons as follows:

“1.	A declaration that on a true and proper interpretation of the Labour Act 2003 (Act 651), particularly s.1, the application or the purported application of the said Act to cover the Customs, Excise and Preventive Service (CEPS) as established by law is inconsistent 