PINAMANG v. ABROKWA Company law—Oppressive conduct—Conduct amounting to oppression—Prerequisites for relief against oppression—Limitation—Failure by respondents to prove harsh and burdensome conduct and also their interest disregarded by appellant—Complaint that appellant obtained collateral advantage from company and demoted first respondent as officer without authority—Whether such conduct constituting oppression—Whether conduct remediable under section 218 of Act 179. Companies Code, 1963 (Act 179), s. 218.