LOKKO v. LOKKO Practice and procedure— Writ—Setting aside—Service out of jurisdiction—Plaintiff obliged under Order 2, r. 4 of L.N. 140A to apply for leave before issuing writ outside jurisdiction—Service of writ without leave constituting fundamental breach and therefore void—Foreign address of respondent strong indication that writ intended to be served outside though not conclusive—Evidence of solicitors and lawful attorney within jurisdiction ready to accept service and act on respondent’s behalf—Effect—Whether Order 2, r. 4 applicable in the circumstances—High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1954 (L.N. 140A), Orders 2, r. 4 and 70, rr. 1 and 2 .