<a href="findrulings.php?searchval=AMUAH&judgementtype=Presiding Judge"  class=judge>AMUAH. J.A:- This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant was tried 
before the erstwhile National Public Tribunal for: 
a) Conspiracy to commit crime namely forgery contrary to 
Sections 22(1) and 139 of the Criminal Code 1960 (Act 29) 
and section 16 of the Public Tribunals Law 1964 (PNDCL 78) 
b) Forgery of document uttering forged documents contrary to 
Section 169 of the said Criminal Code 1960 (Act 29) and 
Section 16 of the Public Tribunals Law 1964 (PNDCL 78). It was therefore not appropriate to have equated the conviction of the 
