 R U L I N G  
I take notice of the fact that the Plaintiff/Respondent had ample opportunity afforded to them by the Court to oppose the application on matters of fact but spurned  that opportunity from the affidavit evidence and the pleadings, I do not think that the Defendant/Applicant has admitted owing the monies being claimed by the Plaintiffs.   
The 1st Respondent is not ordinarily resident in Ghana and neither is the 2nd Plaintiff a Ghanaian company and so also is the 3rd Plaintiff who there is affidavit evidence that she once jumped bail.  Be that as it may, I think the Defendant/Applicants have made out a case for the Plaintiff/Respondent to provide security for cost so that at the end of the trial if and only if the Defendant succeeds in this action, their victory does not become an empty victory on paper.   
The Applicant is asking for $200.00 as security for cost. No known accurate mathematical basis has been given for making such a demand for $200.00 as security for cost and as 
3  
Defendants themselves have not made any counterclaim to that effect what then comes to be determined should be a fair figure to cover for the cost of this litigation.   
I accordingly grant the application and order the Plaintiffs to provide a security to the tune of $50,000.00 or its cedis equivalent. I order that the Plaintiffs comply within a period of 30 days.     
                      (SGD.) JUSTICE ERIC KYEI BAFFOUR  JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT      
REPRESENTATIONS:  
3RD PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT PRSENT & REPRESENTS OTHER PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS  
EUDENA BAAH-DUODU FOR KWEKU PAINTSIL, ESQ FOR THE PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS – PRESENT   
BOBBY BANSAN, ESQ FOR 1ST & 2ND DEFENDANT/APPLICANT – PRESENT  