WUAKU v ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND ANOTHER     Constitutional law—Retirement of superior court judge—Determination of pensionable service—Effect of continuance in office to complete part-heard cases—Extension of retiring judge’s tenure under PNDCL 161 pensionable service—Object of constitutional provision permitting retiring superior court judges time to complete part-heard cases—Plaintiff on attaining compulsory retiring age granted one year extension under PNDCL 161—Extension expiring on 29 December 1992—Plaintiff subsequently continuing in office for over six months to complete part-heards—Whether continuance pensionable service—Constitution, 1992 coming into force during period of continuance—Whether plaintiff’s retiring awards determinable under Constitution, 1992—Applicable enactments—Pensions Ordinance, Cap 30 (1951 Rev)—Pensions (Amendment) Ordinance, 1954 (No 31 of 1954)—Constitution, 1969, art 116(2)—Constitution, 1979, art 128(2)—Judiciary (Retiring Ages) Law, 1986 (PNDCL 161), s 1(2)—Pensions (Amendment) Law, 1986 (PNDCL 162)—Constitution, 1992.