J U D G M E N T  
The Plaintiff claims against the Defendants the following reliefs: 
1. An order to compel the two Defendants to nullify and or cancel the registration of all titles to lands which violate the decision of the Supreme Court dated 19th October, 1988. 
2. Costs.  
On the 8th day of May, 2015, Her Ladyship Justice Hafisata Amaleboba (Mrs.) entered Interlocutory Judgment in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in default of appearance and ordered that the case be adjourned             for the plaintiff to lead evidence in proof of the reliefs.  
The defendants did not enter an appearance. A motion to set aside the judgment in default of appearance by the defendants was stuck out for want of prosecution. Although served the defendants did not appear in court, neither did they testify in the matter.   
The plaintiff’s case is that he is the Chief of Papase and brings this action on behalf of himself, the Papase Stool and on behalf of the Gbese Stool, owners of Papase lands. His contention is that he brought the defendant companies to 
2  
court because they have stolen his land, the Gbese Papase stool lands, and sold it and registered the land in the name of those people. He tendered a copy of the plan of their stool land as exhibit A to indicate the demarcation of their land.  
He testified that around 1983-1984, there was a litigation between him, his father and siblings on one side and Ayi Quarshie Solomon on the other side which was finally decided by the Supreme Court on the 19th October, 1988. He contended that the Supreme Court ruled that the land belongs to the Gbese Stool, and was not under the jurisdiction of the Ga Mantse nor Nii Amoah of Adjei Kotoku and tendered the said Supreme Court judgment as exhibit B. He asserted that during the pendency of the above mentioned suit, their land was under Eastern Region and they registered the land under Eastern Region and it is still under the Eastern Region. According to him the land is under the Greater Accra Region and now Papase is under the Greater Accra Region. He claimed that the 1st defendant stole part of their land and registered it in the name of the Adjen Kotoku in the Greater Accra, so their lawyers wrote letters to the Lands Commission that the registration they have done in the name of Adjen Kotoku should be cancelled and he tendered exhibits C and C1 in support of his claim. He stated that the defendants did not respond to the said letters hence they came to court. He stressed that although the Supreme Court judgment referred to above as exhibit D said Papase lands belong to Gbese stool, Lands Commission has registered some lands for Adjen Kotoku people without reference to the Gbese stool. He said Nii Kwei Tsuru family, Nii Amarkai, Asafotse Okpoti III, Nii Klotia family of Adjin Kotoku, Mohammed Jebri, Alhaji Issa Salifu and one Doctor Muniru Zakaria are the beneficiaries of the registration by the Lands Commission. According to him Alhaji Issa Salifu and Muniru Zakaria have registered the land in Accra and not Koforidua or Eastern Region. He tendered exhibit D in the name of Alhaji Issah Salifu in support of his contentions. 
The plaintiff’s evidence is unchallenged. An evaluation of the evidence adduced indicates that the plaintiff has discharged the burden of proof on him as required by Section 11(1) and (4) of the Evidence Act 1975 (NRCD 323). Judgment is therefore entered for the plaintiff against the defendants herein for the reliefs sought.  
I have considered the factors stated in Order 74 rule 2(3) of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (C.I. 47) as amended by C.I.87 and the facts and 
3  
circumstances of this case and award costs of GH¢5,000.00 to the plaintiff  against the defendants herein.    
                                                          (SGD) 
GEORGINA MENSAH-DATSA 
 (JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT)   
Counsel:                                                                                   
1. Mr. Nkrabea Effah Darteh for Plaintiff. 
2.  No representation for Defendants. 
                  